Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Was the13 Kompanie always the MG Kompanie?


    Recommended Posts

    All,

    I've had a Bluse to 13K 139IR for quite some time.

    I've always thought the 13K =MGC. Would this be a factual assumption in 1916?

    I know some regiments went to a 4th Bn and the MGC became the 15th K.

    Not sure about the 139th?

    In any event would this rule have still been in effect in 1916?

    g2au.jpg

    4c71.jpg

    b55l.jpg

    ct91.jpg

    Any help appreciated

    Joe Sweeney


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Joe,

    As I understand it, the addition of a fourth battalion to a few regiments caused the MGK to become the 17.Komp. (KME of 2.9.15). In most regiments, the 13.Komp. remained the MGK.

    Chip

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Eric,

    The 14th was for sure, but how many regiments would have had fortress MG units? I can only imagine that the regiments that were garrisoned in or near towns that had fortresses would have provided these companies.But would every regiment have a need for such a company?

    Chip

    Edited by Chip
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.