Peter J Posted January 5, 2015 Posted January 5, 2015 Gents, best wishes on the new year. An acquaintance of mine asked me to scan this Olympia Cross 1st class and ask for opinions. Given the missing rivets and the configuration of the loop, I think it's safe to assume it's not an original awarded type. With that said, I believe there is some age attached to this piece and that it initially was gilded bronze (as per given specifications). So could this be a display-piece for i.g. the Olympia arenas or just a fairly good modern fake?
J Temple-West Posted January 6, 2015 Posted January 6, 2015 Morning, Peter As you say, fairly well done.....but still a fake. Lots of things wrong with it; general quality is poor, construction poor, the swas is too small, poor gilding, no rivets...to name a few. A side by side by side comparison with an original would show this up for what it is.
Peter J Posted January 6, 2015 Author Posted January 6, 2015 Thanks John. I've never handled any of these rare pieces, hence comparing images is my only option. I fully realize this piece have major differences compared to any other cross I've seen i.g. loop and rivets. The cross in Niemann's book appears to be a text-book version with hollow rivets and a leaf-pattern on the wreath. On the other hand, the cross in Angolia's book has a correct loop, but the same small swastika, non-existent leaf-pattern and rounded rivets. I've no illusions of "my" cross being an original, I'm merely interested in who might have produced it and more importantly, when.
J Temple-West Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 Morning, Peter... So, dug out my old copy of Forman's guide, and have to say that the example shown (although not being very clear) does have the correct sized swas and the detailed leaves on the wreath as found on originals. As to when your cross was made.....no idea. Best guess...1970's. I've put together a quick comparison of an original and your piece to show the differences. Hope this helps.
Peter J Posted January 7, 2015 Author Posted January 7, 2015 Thanks again John. That image is soo much better than the one shown in my 2nd edition of Foreman's book
lambert Posted January 7, 2015 Posted January 7, 2015 impressive. I would not know to compare with an original medal, more differences is nitida. It is very good to have an opnion of experts in this field. Lamber
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now