Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted (edited)

    Dear Collegues,your opinion ,please.The complete was bought in 2001.1st clas is solid gold-weihgt 28 gr.Numbers on the reverses are the same ilke in the Orders book.Mikuláš

    Snímek 003.jpg

    Snímek 004.jpg

    Picture 035.jpg

    some more pictures

    Picture 036.jpg

    s1.jpg

    Snímek 006.jpg

    Edited by nickstrenk
    Posted

    Mikuláš,

      Unfortunately, the Order of Glory First Class is a reproduction and not an authentic piece.  Additionally, there is no record of OGI serial number 2412 ever having been produced/awarded which makes the OGII, OGIII and Ordenskaya Knizhka in this "set" similarly bad.

    Regards,

    slava1stclass

    Posted

    Thanks,the answers similar yours, I have already had.I do not exactly undderstand-reproduction?Fake?Copy in correct metal?What to do with it?To sell as gold to a goldsmith?The Orders book is on Malikov Nikolaj Ivanovich.

    Posted
    1 minute ago, nickstrenk said:

    Thanks,the answers similar yours, I have already had.I do not exactly undderstand-reproduction?Fake?Copy in correct metal?What to do with it?To sell as gold to a goldsmith?The Orders book is on Malikov Nikolaj Ivanovich.

    nickstrenk, 

      The word reproduction as I've used it here means something meant to deceive - it is not an official mint-issued duplicate.  To call it a fake is also accurate.

      You would have to have a jeweler test the metal to confirm whether it is actually gold.  It is then up to you to decide how you want to dispose of the OGI.  Selling it for its pure gold content alone would be an option.  

      None of the three OG serial numbers listed in the OK match those awarded to Malikov, Nikolay Ivanovich.

    Regards,

    slava1stclass

    Posted

    I will do it again.I visited the goldsmith at least 3 times and he made the examination on the stone using acid.But not пробу .So the accurate word is  фуфло,is not it?

    Posted (edited)

     

    3 minutes ago, nickstrenk said:

    So the accurate word is фуфло,is not it?

    nickstrenk,

      Yes, the Russian word "фуфло" is an accurate description.

    Regards,

    slava1stclass

    Edited by slava1stclass
    Posted (edited)

    I would also add, that the handwriting stile in the award booklet is not convincing at all, and reminds me of a a student handwriting from 1990s. Not a hard evidence, but one should also have in mind nonetheless. 

    Edited by Egorka
    Posted
    19 hours ago, slava1stclass said:

    Yes, the Russian word "фуфло" is an accurate description.

    For those wondering "фуфло" translates to 'garbage'.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.