Help with Belgrade medal

[Raven]

Im new one here, so first big hello to everyone. As i wrote in the title, i need some help with this medal...i researched many forums and sites, but still im not sure about originality. It looks like type 1. How can i upload pictures? They are 3.5 mega and everytime i tried to upload it says Error...cheers

[nickstrenk]

Raven,hi!

Reduce or cut the size of the photo of the medal.. Drag files here to attach, or choose files...

[Raven]

Thanks for help, here are some pictures, i hope they are good enough, but this is the best my camera can do.

[Raven]

Nobody? I would be really grateful for some confirmation. Cheers

[Leaftree]

I'm not an expert but I think it looks good. Anyone else have some thoughts?

[rocketscientist]

This medal looks very credible, in my opinion. I cannot find significant morphological differences with respect to my originals, nevertheless the reverse lacks of texture, as if the medal was never awarded. This is possible, also considering the outgrowth which was not removed. Such defects were very common during the struck of the medals, in many cases they were corrected by filing rather than rejecting the imperfect piece. 

Here is my example of LoB of the same variation (left leaf pointing upwards) for comparison.