Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted (edited)

    Equipment used by South African forces in WW1 varied greatly and can be analysed according to the various campaigns and theaters.

    The Pattern 1903 Bandolier Equipment was used by South African Artillerymen in East Africa, Palestine and also by the South African batteries of the Royal Garrisson Artillery on the Western Front. Only the 50 round bandolier, water bottle and haversack were worn and used.

    Large numbers of german leather equiment had been captured during the German South West African Campaign and these sets were used mainly by the machine gun elements of the South African Mounted Riflemen in German East Africa. This equipment is better known as the "Schutztruppen" or Mounted equiment.

    Some sub-units in East Africa were issued with the Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment but this was very limited ("A " Company of the 6th SAI). Most units used the 50 and 60 round bandoliers.

    The Battalions of the Cape Corps were issued with Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment and they used the equipment in both German East Africa and Palestine.

    The South African Infantry regiments that fought on the Western Front were mainly issued with the Pattern 1914 Leather Infantry Equipment so they DID use and wear the "snake-buckle" belt.

    Some photographic evidence exists of individual memebrs of these regiments wearing the Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment.

    I am fortunate to have complete sets or examples of these items in my collection.

    Regards,

    Will

    Edited by sabrigade
    • Replies 58
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted

    Sorry about that Jef,

    I'm off to a great start misspelling you name.

    Dave

    Hello Dave,

    I'm really impressed by your knowledge about these snake buckles.Thank you for sharing your knowledge. About the misspelling of my name, don't worry.

    Kind regards from Flanders,

    Jef

    Posted

    Equipment used by South African forces in WW1 varied greatly and can be analysed according to the various campaigns and theaters.

    The Pattern 1903 Bandolier Equipment was used by South African Artillerymen in East Africa, Palestine and also by the South African batteries of the Royal Garrisson Artillery on the Western Front. Only the 50 round bandolier, water bottle and haversack were worn and used.

    Large numbers of german leather equiment had been captured during the German South West African Campaign and these sets were used mainly by the machine gun elements of the South African Mounted Riflemen in German East Africa. This equipment is better known as the "Schutztruppen" or Mounted equiment.

    Some sub-units in East Africa were issued with the Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment but this was very limited ("A " Company of the 6th SAI). Most units used the 50 and 60 round bandoliers.

    The Battalions of the Cape Corps were issued with Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment and they used the equipment in both German East Africa and Palestine.

    The South African Infantry regiments that fought on the Western Front were mainly issued with the Pattern 1914 Leather Infantry Equipment so they DID use and wear the "snake-buckle" belt.

    Some photographic evidence exists of individual memebrs of these regiments wearing the Pattern 1908 Web Infantry Equipment.

    I am fortunate to have complete sets or examples of these items in my collection.

    Regards,

    Will

    Hello Will,

    Thank you for your answer about the snake buckle belt. Much appreciated.

    Kind regards,

    Jef

    Posted

    Hello Gentlemen-

    Thank you for a very interesting topic - very different to my usual readings.

    "I am fortunate to have complete sets or examples of these items in my collection." - Come on now Will, don't tease, pictures please ...

    regards

    Thomas

    Posted

    Hi Thomas,

    I hope to be back in South Africa next week and will make it a seperate thread.

    Regards,

    Will

    • 4 weeks later...
    Posted

    Hi Jef,the snake buckle belts were traditionally worn by British Rifle Regiments since the Napoleonic wars.The belts were black leather and the buckles brass or white metal.I have a few pics from the Royal Green Jackets museum at Winchester you might find interesting,not the best quality though I'm afraid.I also picked up a a snake buckle belt recently to display with a KRRC tunic I have.You can see by the pics that it is almost identical to the belts shown in the RGJ museum,however,the belt is marked with what looks like police collar numbers and has an 'MP' stamp so I believe this to be a old Metropolitan Police belt from Greenwich Division,I hope this is of some interest,all the best,

    Paul

    First pic is of a KRRC Sargeants tunic from before WW1

    Posted

    Hello Paul,

    Thank you for the info and photographs. It seems a lot of gents are interested in this tiny snake.

    Best regards, :beer:

    Jef

    Posted

    You're welcome Mervyn,I couldn't make out the date but it looks like its seen a fair bit of service,cheers,

    Paul

    Posted

    You're welcome Mervyn,I couldn't make out the date but it looks like its seen a fair bit of service,cheers,

    Paul

    • 3 weeks later...
    Posted

    Gentlemen,

    1- As to the suggestion that the snake buckle would date back to the Vikings, I must disappoint you - the Vikings (c. 800-1100) had completely different types of clasps and buckles.

    2- As to the "Why" of the design; the snake buckle was easy and cheap to produce and thus popular for a long period by many uniformed organisations.

    Posted

    Gentlemen,

    1- As to the suggestion that the snake buckle would date back to the Vikings, I must disappoint you - the Vikings (c. 800-1100) had completely different types of clasps and buckles.

    2- As to the "Why" of the design; the snake buckle was easy and cheap to produce and thus popular for a long period by many uniformed organisations.

    Dear Odulf,

    Thank you for your answer. Concerning the "Why" of the design: If the manufacturers would have made a simple S hook-shaped piece of iron, it would be even more cheaper, but I was wondering why especially the figure of a snake? It feels oriental. And it was used world-wide, mostly by western forces.

    I think this question will never be solved. The origins are fainted in the mist of time.

    Kind regards,

    Jef

    • 4 months later...
    Posted

    Hello. This is a snake buckle clasp on a gun belt which I acquired a couple of months ago at auction. It is different from any buckle I have been able to find on any other site including this one.The number on other side of the clasp appears to be 019. Can anyone identify this buckle and gun belt?

    TIA

    IMG_0023.jpg

    snakebucklebelt003.jpg

    snakebucklebelt001.jpg

    snakebucklebelt002.jpg

    Posted

    Hello Toondowndon,

    Thank you for showing your snakebuckle. I immediately saw, your snake has a head and a tail, my snakes have two heads and no tail at all. A big difference and a question more to answer.

    Kind regards from Flanders,

    Jef

    Posted (edited)

    If you look at the Guest Identification forum you will see a litle more information on the British snake bucle belts in its 19th century incarnations.

    Peter

    Edited by peter monahan
    • 1 year later...
    Posted

    Jef,

    What a nice collection of snakes. Have you found any books on them yet? I'd like to learn more about Belgian use of snakes in their Military and by their fire brigades. Do you have any imagery?

    I can tell you that your Snake 1 is the style most commonly used on the British 1914 Leather Pattern belt and it was also used by some Canadian troops in WW1. This same snake pattern was also used by some Australian, British, Canadian, and New Zealand troops during the Boer war.

    You said that Snake 2 and 4 are plain backed. I have a snake similar to these, but I would say the back is flat, rather than plain. Some French snakes have plain backs, in other words the shape is there, just no features. I'll try and attach an image of my snake like your #2 & 4. All I know is that it was reported as WW1 era.

    I have seen examples of 3 as British snakes, but the age of use is not known to me. Was your example dug from a battlefield?

    post-10025-0-66539400-1326096327.jpg

    Posted

    Jef,

    As you can see I'm senile. I was on the first page of this thread and proceeded to admire your collection, oblivious to the point I had replied to you a year and a half ago! I didn't remember where I had first commented in the Club before. Have you collected any more snakes since the initial five? As you can see I still like your snakes and I still am looking for one like your number 3. Do you run across Belgian snake belts like number 5 very often? Have you determined if this was a WW1 era belt?

    Dave

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.