Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Scowen

    Senior Moderator
    • Posts

      2,098
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      4

    Posts posted by Scowen

    1. It's one of the harder pieces to find. However when it comes to value I always say that they are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them.

      I have paid high amounts for items that others would not have paid, purely because I wanted it. Likewise, I often feel a item isn't worth what another is asking for it so will not buy. It's purely down to personal opinion I'm afraid.

      If you are happy with it & the price you paid for it, then enjoy it.

      Cheers

      Don

    2. Hi Scott,

      Here goes:

      1. Freiwilliger Arbeitsdienst, 23.3 mm; Assmann & Sohne / Ges. Gesch

      Personally I can't see anything wrong with this badge....

      2. R.D.K., 24.9 mm; Ges. Gesch. / Circle-B

      I've never really trusted the "B" in a circle mark on any badge. Fakers widely produce badges with this mark & whether a maker used the mark during the period is not really known. I think in this case it comes down to whether you like the badge or not

      3. Deutsche Kindershar N.S.F., 17.9 mm; RZM M1/63

      Another controversial badge amongst enamel collectors. Most do not like the full RZM M1/63 marked versions, however I do feel that providing the other criteria of patina, flecks in the white enamel, wear etc fits then possibley it's a good piece.

      4. D.S.B., 24 mm; Ges.Gesch. / HA

      Bad I'm afraid. The mark on the reverse is a poor copy of the Aurich mark, if you look closely it's more of a "B" over the "A" rather than an "H" as it should be. Also Genuine ones have a far better detailed number of dots within the red enamel of the roof. Check this link out that shows other examples of Aurich marks http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=5892

      5. Adolf Hitler 1933, 22.9 mm; RZM / Ges. Gesch

      I'm sure that you know the many arguments that surround these badges. Personally I would not go near an RZM'd piece, especially when there isn't an M1 code with it.

      6. Deutschland Erwache 1933, 22.9 mm; RZM / Ges. Gesch

      Ditto for the badge above.

      Cheers

      Don

    3. Sorry for replying so late Peter, as you know I've had a few problems lately. I'm also sorry that no one else here was able to help you with this.

      As you know I have not had one of these, however I have seen them around a few times. From what I've seen of others they are far more detailed than the one you show here, the eagles head for instance is always clearly defined as are the details around the sword hilt & eagles feet. I'm not sure that I like the one you show........ Sorry.

      Cheers

      Don

    4. Hi Jani,

      I'm afraid both are bad.

      The triangle piece is a fantasy item in that it never existed during the period of the Reich. The round one is controversial in that some do feel that it existed but others do not. However yours is definitely bad due to the shape of the plate holding the pin, this style is only found on post war badges. Also the Ges.Gesch should be spelt with a G not C, & finally, on the front the word should read AKAD not ARAD.

      Here's a link to another discussion on these badges http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=14956

      Sorry.

      Don

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.