Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Bilco

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      642
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      2

    Everything posted by Bilco

    1. Hi Jim, Many thanks for clearing that up - I do need to have these things bludgeoned into my head with a large mallet these days ..... Many thanks, too, for your opinion of the vic on e-bay. Bill
    2. Hi Gents, I've just come across this web site - http://www.baystatem...I/WWImedals.htm - which advertises quite a few State medals for WW1, in addition to some vics. You can even buy a length of that multi-striped ribbon! As always, I was looking for something completely different. Bill
    3. Hi Lambert, Thanks for your posts. I guess your Type 3 is the 'No-O' on the reverse type. This reclassification that you and Jim describe is all new to me. Is it going to be generally recognized? The photo you posted also seems to show the marks in the rim of the reverse that I mentioned, and I've been looking at photos of the Greek vic posted in the original Interallied Victory Medals thread, and they all seem to have them, too. Do other members' examples have them? I've also been looking at an Official Type (or Type 1) that's offered on e-bay - http://www.ebay.co.u...984.m1438.l2649 - and it seems to have some differences to the reverse from the norm. For a start, I don't think it has the two marks on the rim, but also the tablet bearing the names of the combattants seems to differ at the corners from all the others of this type that I've seen, particularly on the lower right. It has 'Henri NOCQ' on the obverse in the correct position. I'd welcome any comments on this. Bill
    4. Hi Jim, Many thanks for your very interesting comments on this medal. A 'new' Official Type would really be something! Maybe of interest - in the close-up of the reverse there are two marks on the rim at the 1 o'clock and 11 o'clock. In a thread in the Greece section there are photos of two Official Types http://gmic.co.uk/in...-victory-medal/ and the photos of the reverses there appear to show the same marks. Could they be flaws in the die, and would this indicate that Darrel's and Tim's Official Types and my medal were all struck from the same dies? Bill
    5. Hi Gents, My latest acquisition - the Greek Unofficial Type 1, with 'HENRY NOCQ' incised inside the rim of the obverse. Diameter is 36.8mm Obverse Reverse. The obligatory close-ups: Obverse Reverse The medal came with the cardboard box it was issued in: Outside Inside, showing the stamp of V Canale. How many of these were made, compared with the Official version - how does it compare in rarity and desirability, and what effect does this have on the pricing? Any comments welcome Bill
    6. Hi Jaeger, Seeing his aiguillette I wondered if he was an attache - could he be this man? http://murphyfuneralhome.frontrunnerpro.com/runtime/196/runtime.php?SiteId=196&NavigatorId=31048&op=tributeObituary&viewOpt=dpaneOnly&ItemId=748611&LinkId=221 Bill
    7. Hi Lambert - there is a photo of two medal groups similar to yours here http://gmic.co.uk/in...adian-brothers/ These show the correct order of wearing with and without the 1914-1915 Star. Bill
    8. Another find on the US Militaria Forum - a vic with a bar showing a torpedo with 'TUSCANIA' on it. http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t15200.html I hadn't heard before about the sinking of the troopship Tuscania, taking US Army units across to France, so this is very interesting. I assume the bar is an unofficial addition, created by the association of the survivors of the sinking - they seem to have had several conventions after the Great War. Bill
    9. Wel, Heddwch ac Blwyddwyn Newydd Dda to you Lambert - and to everyone I've come to know through GMIC and our shared interest. And a very impressive display of vics, Lambert! Bill
    10. Hi Jim, Many thanks for clarifying the ribbon issue - I read through the postings from before the creation of our special Interest section some time ago, and obviously misunderstood what was being said. Another web site I've found on a Google safari - http://www.ww1medals.net/WW1-US-Navy-Victory-medals.htm There is also a page for the Army. This page shows a letter laying out the Navy criteria for applying for the Victory medal. In the examples shown below it I see there is a fake 'Russia' Navy clasp. Also shown is the ribbon with the figure 3 on it - is the meaning of this determined? I read somewhere that it was worn by members of the Army 3rd Division, but I'm not sure if this is correct. Happy New Year. Bill
    11. Hi Clive, The first ribbon does look like the early US version of the Victory Medal - there is a very similar pair of ribbons here http://gmic.co.uk/index.php/topic/21214-us-ribbon-bar/ in post # 2 the lower bar. What do you think? Bill
    12. Hi Lambert, You have two nice, rather unusual miniature bars there. On the second, I think the Military Cross should be first rather than last on the mount. It's curious how, on the first set each medal is sewn on with thread matching the ribbon, while on the second Pip, Squeak and Wilfred are sewn on with black and the MC with white. The second set are on a Spinks mount - they would be expected to know the right order of wearing. Bill
    13. Hi Jim - No, I hadn't noticed the reversed medal! Is it a Reissue Type, either with bevelled lug or tab suspension, or just a rather heavy bead of solder on a Type 2? Bill
    14. Hi Gents, Off on another safari through Google I came across the US Militaria Forum, which has a section of the WW1 US vics. One thread caught my eye - http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19125 - in post #4 there are a couple of tables extracted from the Gleim Letters showing the various manufacturers of the Navy clasps and how to tell them apart. Apologies if gentlemen here are posters on that Forum too, but I mention it as it may be of help/interest. The whole WW1 US vic section is worth a trawl through. Bill
    15. Many thanks for that info, Jim. Bill
    16. Hi Rob, After a bit of a focus faff - here it is At this size it looks like it says 'FRAMCE'! I see now that the rough edge isn't caused by the off-centre stamp. Bill
    17. Hi Gents, One one of my Googling excursions I've come across this thread on a French site which deals with the Siam vic. It has some admirably large, clear photos of the variants and some discussion of the makers. http://zitocland.forumpro.fr/t15359-siam-interalliee Hope it's of interest, Bill
    18. I think this bar is discussed here http://gmic.co.uk/index.php/topic/3219-imperial-fakes/page__st__40 post #58 onwards. Bill
    19. Hi Gents, I've just come across the on-line catalogue for the Watson Medal Collection in the Fitzwilliam Museum, in Cambridge. http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/dept/coins/collection/watson/ This collection has been mentioned a couple of times on the GMIC Forum in the past. However, I found a section in the catalogue dealing specifically with the Inter-Allied vics - there are 13 in the collection, covering most of the Allied nations. They are here http://www.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/dept/coins/collection/watson/catalogue/index5.html just below section E (no, it isn't called F!). The collection was amassed in the late 1920s, according to the catalogue notes. Of interest is the Great Britain vic, which the notes say is un-named, and seem to imply that none were named. The Japanese is correctly catalogued as a copy, and the Greek is the 'no-O' version. Does anyone have any other observations of the medals shown? Just shows - we are following in a long tradition of Inter-Allied vic collectors. Bill
    20. Hi Rob, Thanks for the confirmation. There is no other stamping on the rim - no Bronze. On the ribbon - it's one of the 39mm wide ones - my Italian original ribbons are 37mm. French ones are 36mm! Bill
    21. Hi Gents, Well, having given up on the Type 1 in the face of modern copies, my latest acquisition is this: What I believe is a Repro Type 1, French-made US vic. The planchet diameter is 36mm, thickness 2mm, and it has 'Made in France' stamped - rather poorly, and in tiny letters - on the rim. Obverse. The rough edge at the 5.30 is where the 'Made in France' stamp went off the rim because it wasn't aligned properly. Reverse. At least it's a good, honest Repro - I hope! All comments welcome. Bill
    22. The medals of Colour Sergeant Stephen Bardsley have been sold for £118,000 - http://www.bosleys.co.uk/ He has an unusual Bronze Star to add to his Military Medal and BEM. Bill
    23. Ancestry have just put the Silver War Badge database online - http://search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=2456&o_xid=49820&o_lid=49820&o_sch=Email Of course, you need a subscription to read it - but perhaps not tonight - there is free access to war time records today in honour of Pearl Harbour. Bill
    24. With regard to the black bar and the wearing by mothers of their deceased sons' medals - in the Belgium thread, subject the Commemorative medal of WW1, there is some discussion of this, and a photo of a mother wearing her son's medals http://gmic.co.uk/in...-war-1914-1918/ post #20 Hope this helps. Bill
    25. Hi Lambert, Thanks for posting the photo of João da Silva's original design for the Portuguese vic. It seems that there is always something new to learn about these Interallied medals! Bill
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.