woodeye

Thank you, i have the same repair at the eagle by a Deumer zinc Air gunner badge. The repair rivets also are here of aluminium. woodeye

please write me your opinions ? greets woodeye

please write me your opinions ? greets woodeye

The back is also different a little bit as one can see a piece of paper or newspaper served with one piece as a base. The Richthofen title has the typically black raw material, how the breast eagles etc. Having somebody similar pieces in his collection? Has seen itself never comparable pieces, up to a comparable piece of the web page.

Here two nice Cufftitles, both tapes come from the same reduction. Immelmann title still has his original length, unfortunately, the Richthofen was shortened. Both titles have clear wear. Also the raw material same is only the colour tape is a little darker from the Richthofen. The writing corresponds with both titles not to the state kind. But I have found a very similar variation: http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/uniforms_f...tles/Wever.html

Unfortunately, it has strongly been carried and also been repaired during the war. Pity that the repair so roughly been explained, even though a nice piece. I know the kind of the repair of the eagle already from another airgunner protection from my collection. Unfortunately, the eagle has also oxidised a little bit.

If my newest extension wanted to introduce sometimes. If it was very positively amazed as me had agreed then, actually I had calculated only on a non-ferrous metal wreath and Zinc eagle. But as I have fast ascertained it is an aluminium execution.

Thanks luftguy, this confirms our supposition again, had also already belonged from such signs with the navy and why should it also not have been similar with the air force? woodeye

Looks not bad. Where from she comes?

I found it even in the ground, at that time was attached it still in a leather purse. It was only one souvenir. In the purse still lay nothing but Norwegian coins. Therefore this piece is absolutely an original, but it is a little bit differently to yours. Also is different the screw-nut a little bit. Unfortunately, I cannot say to you whether your execution has also given it. Has never really interested me. woodeye

this is my one

tomorrow i will show you pics from my one, it look a little different woodeye

Thank you all, this also fits to my opinion, had also enquired me again with another collector and he is also of the same opinion, early Bundesluftwaffe. woodeye the fabric is blue

- back metal cord - Would please me about other opinions very much. woodeye

- Inside -

side

Hello, a cap got me has surprised something. I do not like four points with this little ship at all: 1. The metal cord has inside a white thread under ultraviolet light shines. 2. The kind of the former Aufn?hers in the inside feed. 3. Ordinarily, the inside material about the outside material had been sewed Inside, here it is exactly bent. Also only one seam and not is the stitch, otherwise, like here with this little ship. Though I have seen this seam already once with team's trousers, but as said not very often. 4. I can ascertain no impression of an eagle, but a Kokarde was probably fixed sometimes with two stings. Also has the Kokarde a brighter light leave which is also absent for the eagle. On this occasion, it could concern early federal air forces little ship of the officers or another organisation? The kind of the manufacturer's sign becomes or was used with the federal navy little ship. For 2. Little ship WK is known to me no manufacturer's sign of this type which found use in a little ship. Would be nice if to her to me some clarification could get, because is carried it, there no doubt exists. But I would ascribe it rather to another organisation than the air force and hold it for a post-war production, even if it is no copy. woodeye

Hello Does nobody have an opinion to this piece? Or same in his collection. Would please me about answers. I myself hold it for original, even if I do not know the origin and it is also unusual a little bit. woodeye

hello gordon, it?s the second one, i have seen. But not in my collection. sorry woodeye

all the best woodeye

Hallo nesredep, why amazing ? woodeye

and him counterstick. Since her of the same opinion?

detail of the needle.

Here the back.

This is mine if she has agreed only a few weeks ago, it never holds for an original, indeed, thus in the implementation seen. I have seen the needle already with some zinc braces. Indeed, here this is from brass or Tombak.