Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    RobW

    Active Contributor
    • Posts

      1,170
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      1

    Everything posted by RobW

    1. Hello IrishGunner, I would recommend that all information goes into the country specific threads. Tim B and I discussed it the time that the vics received their own special interest area and it was on the list of things to do. Some of the gross duplication could, as you have suggested, be removed in due course. Regards, Rob
    2. I would agree. The reason specific country threads were established is so each was a 'one-stop' area for that country. This avoided the somewhat meandering that occurred in the single 37 page thread. While country threads may change tack on occasion at least all the information specific to that vic is in the one spot. Regards, Rob
    3. Hello Bill, A nice pickup and example. It is not altogether unusual to see small die errors in these official type 1's. At least the Leisek makers marks are nice and strong. They have also been seen with quite muted and soft marks. Regards, Rob
    4. Hello Lambert, There is an official Siam vic currently up for auction ebay (auction no: 121038792722). While it is a bit more worn than usually seen it is an official strike nonetheless. Regards, Rob
    5. Hello Martin, The re-issue type 1 is of a very much lighter bronze finish. In addition it has a number of die differences compared to the official type1. The comparison post in the much larger main pinned thread shows the differences clearly. Yes; very much so. They are distinctive and are seen a bit more regularly than the re-issue type 1. Most definitely yes; The repro type 1 has a slight irridescent finish and has a clearly defined casting line present on the rim. The repro type 2 is extremely hard to find and has a much lower level of detail than the official version. There have been a number of pictures of the repro type 3 in this forum so that is a good reference. Regards, Rob
    6. To one and all, Noting some other references to Alex Laslo's book on the Interallied victory medal series, there is such a copy of the 2nd Edition listed on ebay at the present. Such volumes do not appear all that often. It is auction number: 140898513320. At the time of posting there is but 23 hours remaining of this auction, and it has a reserve price. Regards, Rob
    7. And here are the close-ups. Regards, Rob
    8. To all, Here is another variety of the Milosh Obilich bravery medal. It is a gilt finished bronze variety in 36 mm. The bronze can be seen with wear to the high points of the medal. It has no makers mark on the reverse. Apart from an illustration of such an example in the reference book 'Serbian and Yugoslavian Orders and Decorations' by Pavel Car, I can find no other reference to this particular variety. It comes from an unknown manufacturer. Any thoughts would be welcomed. Close-ups of just the medal to follow. Regards, Rob
    9. Hello Martin, I would definitely agree that the named British vics, to all the commonwealth countries, would maintain a higher value due to the attribution as well as the ability to conduct research into the recipient. Unfortunately with the other country issues, that are not named, such research is difficult. In regards the Belgian and Italian vics both are seemingly plentiful in the market hence the similar values, despite there being more sub-varieties of the Italian model. Regards, Rob
    10. Martin Burr, on 19 Dec 2012 - 08:53, said: Is there a rough guide as to the ballpark values of each version? Martin To all, I have re-posted this post from the fakes sub-forum as it has relevance to the general topic of vic medal values. Any other views would be appreciated? Regards, Rob
    11. Hello Martin, The question on medal values is probably one of the most discussed topics in any collecting field. There is two areas here that need to be understood; market values and collector values. I think a close look at sales on the various online auction houses, ebay sites, and other online medal dealers should give you a general guide as to the prices you could expect for each of the varieties. There is then what a specific collector will pay for the same item; and this may not always be consistent with the market value. I think the numbers minted estimate that is listed in the now increasingly dated Laslo reference, are a good guide, to the relative scarcity of each variety. That should at least give you an indication as to how frequently different pieces turn up in the market. That, in turn, should provide a guide as to what sort of price range you are likely to be looking at, to obtain the piece. I would recommend you keep a price list and update it over time. This will give you a bench-mark to the prices listed. This won't take into account one-off's or other single anomalies for pieces that are just so hard to achieve (I use the hallmarked Brazil official type 1 as an example) but it would be a start. Regards, Rob
    12. Hello Martin, I would suggest (if you can) that you hold off on obtaining any more pieces for your collection and buy the book instead. It is, as you stated, a good reference book well worth having. Having the book is a precursor to the knowledge and would better inform and guide subsequent purchasing choices. The value of a good reference work cannot be underestimated, especially in such an international field as the vics. Regards, Rob
    13. Hello Martin, Welcome to the group. Considering that the vendor resides in the Czech Republic it is not unusual for them to sell just the Czech vic. I have obtained a number of pieces from that vendor and he is reputable. He is also a member of this forum! Regards, Rob
    14. Hello Lambert, While the item in question is quite well worn it is a nice official strike. The Siam vic is becoming much harder to obtain at a reasonable price. Regards, Rob
    15. Hello Jovan, Welcome to the forum. I am sure you will find many experienced collectors here, on the vic series, that will be able to help with any queries. I would suggest this is moved to the 'Other Victory Medal / Related Items' sub-thread. That way the focus of this thread can be the French victory medal. If you have a picture you may want to post it on the 'Other Victory Medal / Related Items' sub-thread for the benefit of all the vic collectors. Regards, Rob
    16. Hello Bill, While the French made clasps are an interesting sideline, I would suspect the fact that the medal is engraved on the front and rim, is probably what attracted the attention. The US vic is seen occasionally with engraving of the recipients details on the obverse of the planchet but in this case it was related to the actual base, and the specific area, and still has the recipients details on the rim. That is unusual and certainly worth the attention. Noting the fact that Navy and Marine Corps personnel were only entitled to wear one clasp, irrespective of further qualifying service that would have accrued subsequent clasps, I would think that maybe the recipient served at the naval base in Cardiff on a Destroyer and then had later service in the White Sea in support of the Siberian expedition. This is, of course supposition but if the recipient wanted to accurately show all of their service the use of French produced clasps was one way to achieve that. Having a name inscribed on the rim would lead to possible research options. All in all a nice piece worthy of a place in a vic collection. Regards, Rob
    17. Hello John, There was no follow-up or reply to the original request by Bison. Since that time the link to that forum is re-directed to a domain hosting web-page. I am not hopeful that such a nominal roll will be surfacing anytime soon from that source. While it doesn't answer your question other avenues may turn up something. Regards, Rob
    18. Hello Bill, A good example you have with nice and distinct strikes. Regards, Rob
    19. Hello Bill, The information being present on the internet is one thing; verifying its accuracy with other information from different sources is half the fun. The fact that a lot of the parent and original documentation is close to 100 years old is also problematic. Regards, Rob
    20. Hello Bill, What does 'is it banners?' mean? I would suggest that it is more likely to be a locally produced example. While it does bear a resemblence to the official strike it is probable that local artisans produced their own copy after the arrival of the official model. It is an interesting piece either way. Regards, Rob
    21. Hello Bill, I have seen these lists before and they have been listed on ebay for a while. While the author is unknown it does indicate in the listing that the information was compiled from a number of sources. It is always handy to have such a list but the references are not indicated so it is anyone's guess how current the information is. Regards, Rob
    22. Hello Kevin, Nice pics. These pictures continue to add to the collection of varieties and sub-varieties and sub-sub-varieties. The list could be endless as time is showing us. The official strikes, in good condition, do not show up all that often. Trying to find one with a corresponding ribbon and clipping all in good condition contiune to prove to be a bit of a challenge. Regards, Rob
    23. Hello Kevin, A nice looking medal in good condition. I note that the ribbon on this Romanian vic appears to be of recent production generally seen in the UK. Is that the case? Is the ribbon clipping and attachment on the back done locally? Regards, Rob
    24. Hello Mel, Have fun with your search. Surprisingly the unofficial types seem to be a bit more prevalent in the market at the moment, than the official strikes. Regards, Rob
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.