ANDY BUTKUS Posted August 31, 2006 Posted August 31, 2006 I've had this unmarked EK2 for some time now, and i was wondering if anyone can help me out with the possible maker on this one...?
ANDY BUTKUS Posted August 31, 2006 Author Posted August 31, 2006 Last picture..I'd appriciate any help, and thanks for looking...
Dave B Posted September 1, 2006 Posted September 1, 2006 Andy,is the eye ring soldered directly to the frame or is it on a small "hump"? Also can you do a clearer shot of the obverse and close up of the beading round the swazDave
ANDY BUTKUS Posted September 1, 2006 Author Posted September 1, 2006 The ring is soldered to the frame...Here are some pictures....
ANDY BUTKUS Posted September 2, 2006 Author Posted September 2, 2006 (edited) Here's a few more....... Edited September 2, 2006 by ANDY BUTKUS
ANDY BUTKUS Posted September 3, 2006 Author Posted September 3, 2006 A wild guess would be appreciated...........
joe campbell Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 micha...bill...come out, come out,wherever you are.....handsome cross, andy!joe
Motorhead Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 I've compared it with the 32 different makers in my collection.....no match!
ANDY BUTKUS Posted September 3, 2006 Author Posted September 3, 2006 Thanks for the replies gents... This one has me stumped too.....
DavidM Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 HelloThe best (wildest ?) guess I have for this one is maker 138, Julius Mauer. Don't get me wrong, I'm by no means certain, but that's the best guess I have.
Bill Garvy Posted September 3, 2006 Posted September 3, 2006 These unmarked Iron Crosses in 2nd Class are very difficult for me to identify unless there are some clearly identifiable characteristics, i.e. Souval. The closest "guess" I am willing to make is an unmarked "55", J.E. Hammer & S?hne of Geringswalde, based soely on a visual comparison of the following features, the last "9" in "1939" appears lower than the second "9", the beading, almost flattened on the high points, and the inconsistent cross-hatching on he inner corners. Finally, the shape of the swastika, and finish of the core compares quite similarly to other "55's" on file in our Databank. This is just my "guess", gentlemen. . .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now