Motorhead Posted October 2, 2008 Posted October 2, 2008 This one dropped in last week-Compare it with the "Heyde C6",they could be twins. The ribbon is not original,it looks like a 1914 replacement.So what do you think?Micha
Eric Stahlhut Posted October 2, 2008 Posted October 2, 2008 :love: it certainly is a very close match. thank you for sharing this!on a side note: i've always found it ironic how these older examples can be dated so precisely, whereas certain younger cousins are sometimes more difficult to pinpoint vis a vis construction date/era. ;)
dond Posted October 2, 2008 Posted October 2, 2008 Not considering you only had a very few makers/variations versus the industrial production that was to come.
Eric Stahlhut Posted October 3, 2008 Posted October 3, 2008 (edited) Not considering you only had a very few makers/variations versus the industrial production that was to come.on the other hand, later on more people were involved in making them, selling them, and wearing them, which theoretically should mean that there would be more documentation. but unfortunately this is not always the case. henceforth the irony, imo. cheers! Edited October 3, 2008 by Eric Stahlhut
Biro Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 A very nice example of a slightly later produced 1813 EK2 Mika. I think you have the date about right.Congratulations..Marshall
Steve campbell Posted October 5, 2008 Posted October 5, 2008 That is a huge addition to anyone collecting the Iron Cross.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now