Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    This is a badge I bought from Forman in 1997.

    Some collectors have expressed their concerns about it as the wreath measures approx 52.3mm high and 41.3mm wide which is a little bit less than the regular Assmann Air Gunner badge. The eagle wingspan is 40.95mm compared to the usual 41.65. The "A" maker mark on the eagle is also unusual.

    I have seen identical badges shown on other forums and there has never been an issue with them but I suppose we are learning new things all the time. Stephen Previtera shows an identical badge on p294 in his book on Luft Badges.

    What do the gentlemen of this forum think?

    Stan

    Posted

    I’ve been looking very closely at this badge type over the past few months, ever since the opportunity of having an example in-hand.

    When I first saw these badges I thought Assmanns use of dies used in the earlier production of the aluminium series acceptable, and in fact commendable during a time when high quality steel used in the production of dies was a hard commodity to come by. These thoughts combined with photos available, and the opinions given by owners were enough to give enough confidence that these pieces were period.

    Then one was put in the palm of my hand and all positive thoughts were quickly put to one side.

    My first reaction..Why the Juncker eagle? And poorly produced!

    Compare the eagles…Assmann (left) Juncker (right)

    Posted

    Next.....atypical rivets.

    Next…..The A maker mark on the eagle.

    Found on known fakes and post war marked pieces.

    Left: mark found on post war fake flak badge.

    Right: Post war mark found on original 1st pattern Observer's badge by Deumer.

    So, not so clear-cut as once thought, and not for my collection.

    Posted

    JTW, I agree with what you are saying overall, but my eye sees two distinctly different eagles in post #2.

    Posted

    JTW, I agree with what you are saying overall, but my eye sees two distinctly different eagles in post #2.

    Exactly my point, Scott.

    If this badge type was original it would have the Assmann eagle shown on the left of the comparison in post # 2. it doesn't, it has a poorly produced Juncker eagle shown (right) in the same comparison shot.

    Posted

    Well, it certaintly does not look good for my badge.......

    Anyone got a nice original for sale?

    Stan

    Posted

    Ok, here is a clue to another type of badge that should be a cause for concern for collectors

    Same maker mark either stamped at the time of post war production or post war stamp to a period piece....

    ...so time to check those summer eagles.

    I tried to find the full frontal/reverse shots of this early droop-tailed summer eagle in gold but alas no luck.

    Here however is a poor shot of the reverse of perhaps the same badge.

    Posted

    I do not have one of these in my collection. I have never thought they were good for enecdotal reasons (nippled rivits!). I think the analysis here by JTW, especially concerning the maker's mark, makes a good point.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.