U Boot Kapitan Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 I have my doubts on this one. Any opinions welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
U Boot Kapitan Posted November 15, 2009 Author Share Posted November 15, 2009 reverse... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim R Posted November 15, 2009 Share Posted November 15, 2009 reverse... It's a fake. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveL Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 It's a fake. Jim Jim R, Why is it a fake, please enlighten .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex K Posted November 24, 2009 Share Posted November 24, 2009 Jim R, Why is it a fake, please enlighten .......... Well if that's a fake (And it could well be!) I'm glad I got out of TR collecting. TOO much of a minefield now for me regards Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim R Posted November 25, 2009 Share Posted November 25, 2009 Look around the edges on the back it shows that it was molded, also should weigh heavier than the original. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Streptile Posted December 10, 2009 Share Posted December 10, 2009 Yes, a known fake. It's just not a design that was used during the TR, and can be found with many different makers marks, all bogus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now