Gregg78 Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 Hi all, I know these are faked a lot and would like to know what you think of these please… Without swords - marked “L15”. This is slightly thinner than the one with swords. With swords - unmarked. You can see the nickel plate bubbling on the swastika, presumably it has zinc as its base metal? Cheers, Gregg.
Paul R Posted March 23, 2013 Posted March 23, 2013 Hi Gregg!! Welcome to the forum. Both of thse KvKs look like great keepers to me. I am really into the version without swords. Thank you for sharing!
Gregg78 Posted March 24, 2013 Author Posted March 24, 2013 My only concern is with the cross without swords, as doing a search for L15 on the net highlighted the so called “Floch” copies. Can any members shed light on these please?
Paul R Posted March 25, 2013 Posted March 25, 2013 I like the details and etc on this one. If it is a reproduction, I am really scared.
tyanacek Posted April 7, 2013 Posted April 7, 2013 My only concern is with the cross without swords, as doing a search for L15 on the net highlighted the so called “Floch” copies. Can any members shed light on these please? Hello Gregg, You are absolutely correct for being concerned about that KVK1 without Swords: That is an Austrian-made fake and no doubt the work of Johannes Floch. It is a very well-known fake that has plagued our hobby for decades. Best regards, Tom
Laurence Strong Posted April 7, 2013 Posted April 7, 2013 There has been numerous discussions on other forums that they are post war put togethers...... Larry
jonsey2001 Posted January 3, 2014 Posted January 3, 2014 Hello, I have Robin Lumsden's book "Third Reich Militaria" on pg.52 L/15 is Otto Schickle, Pforzheim. And 15 is F.O. Friedrich Orth. Not sure if it makes any difference or if it was worth noting. Well and my wife just joked asking "what are you doing in the gentleman's club?" Cheers! George
military-memorabilia Posted August 28, 2014 Posted August 28, 2014 I'd have to agree that the KVK w/o Swords is Post-WWII. The "5" almost looks like an "S". Since that was the manufacture's calling card, I doubt they would sign their product so sloppily. Even late-war zinc pieces that have I have examined, where the finish is gone, the manufacture's stamp (if present) is always strong and clear.
Jock Auld Posted August 29, 2014 Posted August 29, 2014 (edited) I think that is an important point that the dies were the same quite often. Only the metal quality used was inferior, due to supply issues I suppose? There was a war on you know! I think it often gets forgoten the strike quality is always pretty good in the sort of mid war stuff, is that a fair comment? As such I don't mind the 'inferior quality' of the zincers as there is a better chance you are getting the real deal. I would always rather have something plain looking and of the period than a fancy fake any day! Jock Edited August 29, 2014 by Jock Auld
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now