mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Short Range Day Fighter in Bronze. Reverse.
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Short Range Day Fighter in Silver. Reverse.
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 (edited) Short Range Day Fighter in Gold. Reverse. Edited December 13, 2006 by mmiller
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Short Range Day Fighter (in Gold) with Pendant.
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Short Range Day Fighter (in Gold) with Pendant. Reverse.
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 One item to note - It seems as though Long Range Fighter Spanges are much more rare than their Short Range counterparts. Most of the Long Range clasps encountered are Gold and with Pendant. Very seldom do I ever see the plain Bronze, Silver, and Gold grades. I guess that by the time this badge was institued, the pilots had already qualified for the 'Pendant'.Regards,Mark
François SAEZ Posted December 13, 2006 Author Posted December 13, 2006 Thanks for posting them good friend, most, if not all your badges, especially the fighter clasps should be saved as reference by everybodyAgain, thanks
François SAEZ Posted December 13, 2006 Author Posted December 13, 2006 One item to note - It seems as though Long Range Fighter Spanges are much more rare than their Short Range counterparts. Most of the Long Range clasps encountered are Gold and with Pendant. Very seldom do I ever see the plain Bronze, Silver, and Gold grades. I guess that by the time this badge was institued, the pilots had already qualified for the 'Pendant'.Regards,MarkCorrect analysis sir, valid for other late war instituted clasps
Richard Gordon Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 MarkSuperb as always!One question on the Short Range Day Fighter in Bronze, is the recessed section void of the concentric rings? It looks that way and wondered if it was just the scan.Rich
mmiller Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Hi Rich,I will have to check the badge, itself. The scan does not reflect the 'rings', you are correct. I wonder if the 'chocolate bronze' is just so think, that the rings are not visable. I will follow up.Regards,MarkMarkSuperb as always!One question on the Short Range Day Fighter in Bronze, is the recessed section void of the concentric rings? It looks that way and wondered if it was just the scan.Rich
mmiller Posted December 22, 2006 Posted December 22, 2006 (edited) MarkSuperb as always!One question on the Short Range Day Fighter in Bronze, is the recessed section void of the concentric rings? It looks that way and wondered if it was just the scan.RichHi Rich,Sorry for the delayed reply. No excuse, other than just being lazy! Here are some additional images of the bronze Fighter. I do not see any rotary milling marks. I can't remember the axiom. Are all authentic Flight Spanges manufactured with this, and only this process??? Looking closely at the reverse, I wonder about the coloration inside the perimeter of the wreath? I tried lacquer thinner on a Qtip. The reddish tint is permanent, and is NOT soluable.Regards,Mark Edited December 22, 2006 by mmiller
Richard Gordon Posted December 22, 2006 Posted December 22, 2006 I do not see any rotary milling marks. I can't remember the axiom. Are all authentic Flight Spanges manufactured with this, and only this process???MarkI for one do not know. I was curious as it was strongly implied on another thread I had elsewhere relating to clasps that the rings were indicative of originality on early i.e. tombac, fighter clasps.I questioned it but no-one else wanted to get involved in that discussion.However, your clasp, I think proves that the statement made was incorrect. On your clasp I see nothing to indicate anything other than an original.Rich
mmiller Posted December 22, 2006 Posted December 22, 2006 Rich,Your recollection and mine, then, are the same. Rings are not a guarantee, but are a good sign. Lack of rings........... well........ I am honestly not sure? And I do not recall with conclusiveness that the topic has ever been addressed, and resolved!Here are some additional close-ups. As always, if the (my) Spange is not good, I want to be the first to know.Regards,Mark
Richard Gordon Posted December 22, 2006 Posted December 22, 2006 MarkLet's start a new topic to see if any conclusion or helpful pointers can be made.I will start with what I believe to be a reproduction.Rich
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now