zook Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 [attachmentid=42630]I purchased this cross a while back from one of the major, reputable German dealers. Engraving on reverse - "Hauptmann Graebener" AOKb 1.8.1918Since there is no unit listing... should I correctly assume there is likely "slim to no chance" on finding out more info about this Hauptmann? I welcome member comments and suggestions... thanks! Dan
Mike K Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 Hi Dan,The unit may actually be the AOK6 (not b?) but I'm not up on Imperial Army abbreviations. I have to say though that there appears to be no patina in the engraving whereas the KO stamping is black with age. Makes me wonder when the engraving was applied.RegardsMike
zook Posted June 10, 2006 Author Posted June 10, 2006 [attachmentid=42647]Thanks Mike.. I'll have to find some comparison engravings. Yest, I wondered about the patina. I mean, the piece has definitely been cleaned .... not sure how to proove when a cross has been engraved, other than to compare to other period pieces, and even then.... hmmmm....Anyway, I have attached a photo from another angle which gives a better glimpse of that "b-6." I am not smart on imperial abbreviations either... Dan
Guest Rick Research Posted June 10, 2006 Posted June 10, 2006 That is "A.O.K.6." for Armee Oberkommando 6. Armee.I find no Graebener, active, reserve, Landwehr, army or marines. If he was an ancient recalled retired Landwehr type, that would be the only good explanation for NOT finding him at that rank. That would be precisely the sort of GHQ Captain I'd have expected to only be getting an EK1 for long and distingusihed lighting of cigarettes and shuffling of baggage in August 1918.I wouldn't abandon all hope, but I don't see any suspects.
zook Posted June 10, 2006 Author Posted June 10, 2006 That is "A.O.K.6." for Armee Oberkommando 6. Armee.I find no Graebener, active, reserve, Landwehr, army or marines. If he was an ancient recalled retired Landwehr type, that would be the only good explanation for NOT finding him at that rank. That would be precisely the sort of GHQ Captain I'd have expected to only be getting an EK1 for long and distingusihed lighting of cigarettes and shuffling of baggage in August 1918.I wouldn't abandon all hope, but I don't see any suspects.Uugh.... sad to know! but THANKS Rick for the quick research summary and expert advice!!! Dan
joe campbell Posted June 11, 2006 Posted June 11, 2006 beautiful, original cross!i'm having a bit of a hard timewith the difference in toning between theinscription and the maker mark...wish i could be more definitive joe
Daniel Murphy Posted June 11, 2006 Posted June 11, 2006 (edited) i'm having a bit of a hard timewith the difference in toning between theinscription and the maker mark...I have a tendency to agree. To a point. The engraving does appear to be in a period script and does have the same patina as the area of the cross where it was placed. (That is the most important thing).The patina also appears genuine. Perhaps it was just an old polishing that was not so thorough and did not remove the patina from the MM. Years later, the two will show a different degree of patina. One more thing, usually fake engraving will be to someone famous and tracable. Since this man is neither, there is a better chance it is real. Nice piece.Dan Murphy Edited June 11, 2006 by Daniel Murphy
zook Posted June 11, 2006 Author Posted June 11, 2006 Thanks fore the comments Joe and Dan! Please see below item on German E-bay. I can't speak for the legitimacy of the engraving, but it appears to be an original "KO" first class currently for sale, that has reverse engraving with similar disparity in patina..regards, Dan Item #628480http://cgi.ebay.de/EK-1-Klasse-1914-mit-Tr...mdZViewItem9474
Glenn J Posted June 11, 2006 Posted June 11, 2006 The only suspect I have found and that concurs with Rick's assessment that this guy was getting on a bit was one Hauptmann der Landwehr a.D. Leopold Graebener of Landwehrbezirk Karlsruhe:Hptm. 15.2.87Pr.Lt. 8.6.78Sek.Lt. 18.7.70He retired from the Landwehr in 1896/1897He is listed in the 1904/05 Ordensalmanach under the name Gr?benber as an Hofgarten-Direktor.RegardsGlenn
Minas Henrik Posted June 12, 2006 Posted June 12, 2006 (edited) Hi Guys!Thats a lovely and fine looking cross indeed. Thanks for the show.Best Regards Henrik. Edited June 12, 2006 by Minas Henrik
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now