Jump to content
Gentleman's Military Interest Club

Recommended Posts

Dear friends,

I bought this miniature bar a couple of days ago and was wondering whether it is possible to determine the recipient? The ribbons were loosely attached to the bar and I am reasonably sure it is the original combination. Thank you very much for any help, greatly appreciated!

Dietrich Maerz

 

Boer.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the distinctive entitlement of a Fusilier from "Barton's Fusilier Brigade" they are the only people (apart from a few outliers) who got Relief of Mafeking & Ladysmith, its a small unit comprised of 27 men from the 2nd Royal Fusiliers, 20 men from 2nd Royal Irish Fusiliers, One Officer & 25 Men from 1st Royal Welsh Fusiliers and One Officer & 25 men from 2nd Royal Scots Fusiliers.

You can check which Fusiliers from those units received the DCM and cross check the Q.S.A. rolls, there will only be very few to earn those bars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely if it were a DCM and bar the DCM would be Victoria or EVII.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If he served in the Boer war, got his QSA, then KSA.... then in WW1 got the DCM long before the 14-15 star was awarded... it would be a possible wartime mounting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ìf the dcm was GV then there would be ww1 medals entitlement.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, paul wood said:

Ìf the dcm was GV then there would be ww1 medals entitlement.

Paul

Unless he was wearing it during the war before any of the trio was introduced? Probably unlikely, but theoretically possible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

True Chris a WW1 DCM and bar with previous Boet war service.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

A double DCM mounted for wear, with a rosette instead of a dated bar for the second award is certainly possible.  or it is an improvement / error / fake.  This question was asked on another forum as well and I don't think any of a list of six 'possibles' given there was a Fusileer.

I'm a firm proponent of Occam's Razor - the simplest explanation is the one most likely to be correct.  And the simplest explanation, IMHO, is that it isn't quite right.  :(

Edited by peter monahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter.

Occam's razor brings back memories of my philosophy course all those years ago. I think you are right the group has more questions than answers.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I actually taught philosophy, to teenagers, which was both fascinating and frustrating by turns!  Two problems with 'puzzles' is that, in terms of 'events' conspiracy theories are almost always more fun than the boring old truth and, in cases like this, it is fatally easy to fall in love wiuth one's own 'clever answer' [aka 'castle in the air'.] 

But then, that's what makes us human.  Those of us who are!

 

Edited by peter monahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the answers. I bought the bar simply because of the QSA miniature since that is what I mainly was after. When I got it I thought it might be able to trace the owner. However, it is completely unimportant to me. And it could very well be that it is “fabricated”. 

Thanks again for your help!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dietrich,

Whether or not the 3 x medals in the illustration were ever worn by a single recipient, and or you can not positively identify the recipient, you still have an interesting lot there.....

If indeed the DCM medal has 'For Distinguished Conduct in the Field' on the reverse of it, then at a minimum you have a very scarce strike / issue type of miniature DCM - I say this as the DCM was never officially struck or awarded with a coinage head of King George V

As miniature medals were commercially struck and retailed items, variations in them abound. It wont be unique, but it is more valueable than the standard issue/strike, and hence will be of interest to miniature medal collectors who like to collect all types of variants......

Mark

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mark,

the mini is inscribed "For Distinguished Conduct in the Filed" on the reverse. I noticed that this type is listed in the Medal Yearbook 2017 for £ 70-100 which seems to indicate a quite rare item, just as you said.

Thanks again,

Dietrich

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 As the DCM was only awarded to other ranks miniatues are scarcer. mainly worn by those later commissioned.

Paul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dietrich,

I'm glad that your DCM is indeed a DCM, with correct inscription on reverse of the medal.

However, you should be wary of the ambitious value shown in Medal Year Book against miniature GV DCM's. It would be a very happy vendor who could receive the values therein shown.....

The type II variant they refer to is NOT what you have (yours is actually much scarcer - do not however assume the value doubles...), the type II in the MYB refers to the standard second type GV DCM obverse which was a 'Crowned head' medal

Mark

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×