GREAT study, and great photos! This is something that needs a good look. I have no proof to back up my assertions, let me start off with that. I BELIEVE the E2 was attached much later than WW2. While I agree that attaching the eagle would disturb the hinge/catch, that means we beleive the hinge/catch were attached. I do not. I believe there was a nice stock of wreath/guns laying around that someone got ahold of, but alas he had no eagles. Th E2 is nothing like the E1 , and why would such a minor producer of Flak badges change their die? They would not need to. They could do their whole production run in short order. That said, it is certainly possible that the die had a catostrophic failure and broke. But due to the lack of wear on the eagle I would say it was attached MUCH later. Maybe the wreath was in a crate that was dug up and had worn a bit - who knows. You can attach a hinge/catch later. There are subtle differences in your photos when you look at the wire for example. As for the crease along the edge of the wire, well, any wirecutter will leave such a mark. I think the main issues are: 1) The wear is significantly different on the eagle and wreath 2) Why change eagle dies To refute this idea: 1) This is but one example and more research is needed 2) Die may have broken at some point So we do not have closure, but I think we need to very critically look at these when the potentially most insignificant maker of Flak badges has two completely different patterns. Thanks, great start Kurt! Marc