Gordon Williamson Posted September 12, 2006 Posted September 12, 2006 Recently acquired pair of Godet EK1s. Anyone have any thoughts on the tehory I've seen quoted that the flat "G"s were the official pieces and the vaulted "Godet Berlin" with hooks the private purchase version.The flat "G" has fantastic patina, almost totally black. The vaulted, hooked piece has a bit more wear and tear but still overjoyed to get it (thanks Mike !!!)
Gordon Williamson Posted September 12, 2006 Author Posted September 12, 2006 Reverse. The hooked piece isn't twisted, its just distortion on the scanner.
gregM Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Gordon,That is a pair of Very fine crosses. The Godets with "Fangs" are my favorite of the EKs. I am not sure about the theory. Where would this one fit in? Flat, unmarkerd with hooks.[attachmentid=53520]
Mike K Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 (edited) Hi Gordon,They look good together!Re the theory, I have heard that flat crosses in general were the award pieces, however I would not be surprised to hear that at least some vaulted examples were also award peices (or it would immediately make almost every Meybauer post-war).Personally, I'd put the "fangs" (I guess term that does sound better than zweihacken!) straight into the private purchase (or private alteration) category, regardless of whether the cross was flat or vaulted. If they came from the maker, imo they would have been a special order.I do not think the different Godet cores can be used to differentiate award v's private purchase either.RegardsMike Edited September 13, 2006 by Mike K
dond Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Here is my flat Godet marked 800 with fangs.
dond Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 the reverse. Makes one wonder how many different ways one maker could mark his wares.
Paul L Murphy Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 I think the vaulted WWI Iron Cross 1st Class is one of my favourite decorations. I know the TR collectors will hate me for saying it but they are far classier than the 1939 version. These are beautiful examples.Paul
Motorhead Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 Here are mine-and I totally agree with Paul-I prefer the imperials,too Micha
Daniel Murphy Posted September 13, 2006 Posted September 13, 2006 (edited) Re the theory, I have heard that flat crosses in general were the award pieces, however I would not be surprised to hear that at least some vaulted examples were also award peices (or it would immediately make almost every Meybauer post-war).Convex pieces in any form were private purchase only. This does not mean they were post war, far from it. I have researched some makers DRGM numbers. The DRGM protection given to the Hansen and Meybauer convex screwbacks was approved approximately December 1914. This proves they were made starting fairly early in the war (and of course continuing post war as well). Godet had been making EK1s with double hooks since the 1870s. Apparently you could buy them flat or convex and with or without hooks. This was not an alteration, they were made that way originally. Dan Edited September 13, 2006 by Daniel Murphy
Mike K Posted September 14, 2006 Posted September 14, 2006 Hi,Dan, you are right, I should have written "...post-war or private purchase". I was not thinking of Godet when I wrote about prong alteration however, I was thinking of a fanged Meybauer in my collection which imo has had the prongs added later. I agree re fanged Godets, every one I have seen I would say was done in the shop.RegardsMike
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now