bigjarofwasps Posted October 18, 2006 Posted October 18, 2006 (edited) Below are the figures for fallen British servicmen/women in campaigns since WW2.Palastine- 233 S.E AsiaBomb & Mine clearance 45-49Bomb & Mine clearance 45-56Malaya - 519 Cyprus- 105Near East 54Arabian PenisularBruneiCanal Zone -22 Korea 1950-53 - 1,078.Borneo -16Radfan- 24 South ArabiaMalay PenisulaSouth VietnamNorthern Ireland -719 (includes military deaths on UK mainland and Germany attributed to Irish terrorism) Dhofar - 24 LebanonKenya: 12 Gulf of SuezGulfKuwaitN Iraq & S TurkeyAir Ops IraqRhodesiaSouth Atlantic -255Gulf War -47Former Yugoslavia -48 Sierra LeoneAfganistan- on goingIraq War- on going Edited November 3, 2006 by bigjarofwasps
bigjarofwasps Posted October 19, 2006 Author Posted October 19, 2006 Guys, if anyone has any additional info to add to this list, please post it below, so I can add it to the list.`Lest we forget`
Ed_Haynes Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 And you are defining "British" as legally/ethnically British? (Gorkhas etc. excluded?)
bigjarofwasps Posted October 19, 2006 Author Posted October 19, 2006 And you are defining "British" as legally/ethnically British? (Gorkhas etc. excluded?)No I`d like to include Johny
Marcus H Posted October 19, 2006 Posted October 19, 2006 We lost 47 in the 1990-1991 Gulf War, 9 of those killed by the American's in friendly fire. Two Gurhka's were the first British soldeirs to be killed in Kosovo, the officer from the UK and the NCO from Nepal - both Gurhka's attached to Royal Engineers EOD. Clearing NATO munitions.
bigjarofwasps Posted October 20, 2006 Author Posted October 20, 2006 We lost 47 in the 1990-1991 Gulf War, 9 of those killed by the American's in friendly fire. Two Gurhka's were the first British soldeirs to be killed in Kosovo, the officer from the UK and the NCO from Nepal - both Gurhka's attached to Royal Engineers EOD. Clearing NATO munitions.Cheers Marcus, have ammended the Gulf loses.
Ed_Haynes Posted October 20, 2006 Posted October 20, 2006 (edited) Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded? Edited October 20, 2006 by Ed_Haynes
bigjarofwasps Posted October 21, 2006 Author Posted October 21, 2006 Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded?Anyone under British command, D.O.W, friendly fire, accidents, etc,etc.
Dave Danner Posted October 22, 2006 Posted October 22, 2006 Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded?Southeast Asia 45-46, assuming the list above is based off the GSM clasps, was pre-1947, so it was the British Indian Army. After 1947, they wouldn't be British. Same for others similarly situated, except of course the Gurkha regiments which continued in British Army service. For the Canadians, New Zealanders and Australians, the 1931 Statute of Westminster is probably the cut-off date. Newfoundland is an exception, since in 1934 it reverted to Crown Colony status, but in World War Two its troops were by agreement between Britain and Canada brought into Canadian service. In 1949 it joined Canada. South Africa also was a party to the Statute of Westminster; I think its status was also the same after 1931, but it might have been more or less autonomous before then. Except for the northern counties, Ireland's connection pretty much ends at 1922, even though Ireland technically stayed in the Commonwealth and was a party to the Statute of Westminster. The soldiers of 1/The King's African Rifles and 2/The King's African Rifles who served in Malaya during the Emergency would thus count as "British" in this context, as would 1/The Fiji Infantry Regiment, 1/The Northern Rhodesia Regiment, 1/The Rhodesian African Rifles, and all of the Malay Regiment battalions, the Sarawak Rangers, the 1st Singapore Regiment and other units from British colonies. But the Royal Australian Regiment, the New Zealand Regiment and other Aussie and Kiwi units wouldn't.
bigjarofwasps Posted October 22, 2006 Author Posted October 22, 2006 Cheers Dave thats really interesting thanks for sharing it with us!!!!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now