Jump to content

Britian`s fallen since World War Two


Recommended Posts

Below are the figures for fallen British servicmen/women in campaigns since WW2.

Palastine- 233

S.E Asia

Bomb & Mine clearance 45-49

Bomb & Mine clearance 45-56

Malaya - 519

Cyprus- 105

Near East 54

Arabian Penisular

Brunei

Canal Zone -22

Korea 1950-53 - 1,078.

Borneo -16

Radfan- 24

South Arabia

Malay Penisula

South Vietnam

Northern Ireland -719 (includes military deaths on UK mainland and Germany attributed to Irish terrorism)

Dhofar - 24

Lebanon

Kenya: 12

Gulf of Suez

Gulf

Kuwait

N Iraq & S Turkey

Air Ops Iraq

Rhodesia

South Atlantic -255

Gulf War -47

Former Yugoslavia -48

Sierra Leone

Afganistan- on going

Iraq War- on going

Edited by bigjarofwasps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lost 47 in the 1990-1991 Gulf War, 9 of those killed by the American's in friendly fire.

Two Gurhka's were the first British soldeirs to be killed in Kosovo, the officer from the UK and the NCO from Nepal - both Gurhka's attached to Royal Engineers EOD. Clearing NATO munitions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We lost 47 in the 1990-1991 Gulf War, 9 of those killed by the American's in friendly fire.

Two Gurhka's were the first British soldeirs to be killed in Kosovo, the officer from the UK and the NCO from Nepal - both Gurhka's attached to Royal Engineers EOD. Clearing NATO munitions.

Cheers Marcus, have ammended the Gulf loses. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).

And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded?

Edited by Ed_Haynes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).

And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded?

Anyone under British command, D.O.W, friendly fire, accidents, etc,etc. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still not quite sure what you are counting. You say "British" but for something like the Southeast Asia , the operations (and the overwhelming majority of casualties) were Indian Army operations (the last under theoretical British command). Do you want Indian Army casualty figures included here (or for others?).

And we are counting killed only? Not died or wounded?

Southeast Asia 45-46, assuming the list above is based off the GSM clasps, was pre-1947, so it was the British Indian Army. After 1947, they wouldn't be British. Same for others similarly situated, except of course the Gurkha regiments which continued in British Army service.

For the Canadians, New Zealanders and Australians, the 1931 Statute of Westminster is probably the cut-off date. Newfoundland is an exception, since in 1934 it reverted to Crown Colony status, but in World War Two its troops were by agreement between Britain and Canada brought into Canadian service. In 1949 it joined Canada. South Africa also was a party to the Statute of Westminster; I think its status was also the same after 1931, but it might have been more or less autonomous before then. Except for the northern counties, Ireland's connection pretty much ends at 1922, even though Ireland technically stayed in the Commonwealth and was a party to the Statute of Westminster.

The soldiers of 1/The King's African Rifles and 2/The King's African Rifles who served in Malaya during the Emergency would thus count as "British" in this context, as would 1/The Fiji Infantry Regiment, 1/The Northern Rhodesia Regiment, 1/The Rhodesian African Rifles, and all of the Malay Regiment battalions, the Sarawak Rangers, the 1st Singapore Regiment and other units from British colonies. But the Royal Australian Regiment, the New Zealand Regiment and other Aussie and Kiwi units wouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Blog Comments

    • As a theology student my professor, a much published former Naval chaplain, set us an essay, saying that if we could answer that successfully we would be guaranteed  a good degree "Which of the gospel writers was the biggest liar, discuss."   I got a good mark, but  don't want to be burned for heresy.   P
    • As my father used to say: "Tain't so much Pappy's a liar - he just remembers big."  
    • Brian: First, let me say that I always enjoy reading your blog and your "spot on" comments.  Another fine topic with such a broad expansion into so many different facets.  I had watched this a week or two ago and when reading your blog, it reminded me of this great quote.   There is a great video on the origins of "Who was Murphy in Murphy's Law"   Anyway, about mid way through this video, there is this great quote and I think it sums it up quite well to your statem
    • I've received word from the Curator that she has permission to re-open this summer.   We're already making plans for a November event at the Museum.   Michael
    • I recall I did the same on hot days at Old Fort York back in 1973-74 - wool uniforms, and at 90F they would let you take your backpack off.   Michael
×
×
  • Create New...