Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    At least, I'm assuming that if a doc is issued by the Kriegsmarine to a customs employee then its likely that they were in the water customs branch rather than land. Interesting in that despite being a KM document issued under D?nitz name, the ink stamp is for the Reichsfinanzministerium.

    Posted

    What an amazing document. This is the first KVK document to this branch of service I have seen. This must be among the rarest! Congratulations.

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    :Cat-Scratch: Yup! There weren't exactly a lot of water frontiers NEEDING customs personnel on 1 September 1944!!!!

    Maybe they were pressed into action as auxiliary troops, like Police filling in as army personnel in the Balkans?

    Lots and lots of unanswered questions this one raises! WHERE WAS HE???????????

    Posted

    Yup, there is just something about these non-military recipients that makes one want to know just what they were doing, as opposed to the "yawn" factor of finding a KVK2 doc to, for example, a soldier in a bakery company who spent his day baking loaves for the troops. Essential work maybe, but bo-ring.

    Posted

    What an oddball doc. The Finance bean counters borrowing a KM KVK doc, very strange.

    On the subject, have you ever come across KVK or other 'military' award docs to Wasserschutzpolizei or K?sten polizei officers?

    • 1 year later...
    Posted (edited)

    Hello found this post I am currently researching Hans Heinrich Paul Möller a WW1 vet after which he joined the customs in Bremen his service continued into WW2 and these scans are of parts of his fragebogen as he continued his career into the occupation government, as you can see he recieved KVK II klasse m. Schw. on 8.10.44 while he was Oberzollsekretar I presume this was a non combat role, so why recieve it with swords ? Thanks Mark

    Edited by sef1962
    Posted

    Probably because he was a member of a uniformed organisation contributing to the war effort. The with or without Swords aspect of the KVK is nowhere near as clear cut as you would think.

    There are loads of examples of people you would think should get an award with swords ( an Army General as an example) getting one "without" whilst civilians got one "with".

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.