Tom Y Posted July 12, 2008 Posted July 12, 2008 Dunno diddly about aeroplane stuff, but that looks like a winner. :cheers:
Mike Huxley Posted July 12, 2008 Posted July 12, 2008 Dunno diddly about aeroplane stuff, but that looks like a winner. Tom, with all due respect, if you "Dunno diddly about aeroplane stuff" then why comment on the piece. I would rather wait to see what the true Guru's of Imperial flight badges have to say. IMO, from the pictures I wouldn't like to comment without closer shots of the detail.No disrespect to you Eric, but PLEASE show more detailed shots.Regards, Mike
Ferg1 Posted July 12, 2008 Posted July 12, 2008 Hi Eric, I think that Mike is right , a few more detailed shots would be useful, but IMO on first impressions the badge looks suspect. The finish around the edge on the reverse looks rough, also the hinge block too. The front details around the inner and outer edges of the wreath look vague and worrying! Something doesn't feel quite about the whole thing. Need better pics please ! Ferg1.
Stogieman Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Well, we have really bad pictures. Wehave a very odd patina/frost or finish... A number of keys look correct for this type of badge, but no way to tell unless way better (300DPI) scans of large size for diagnostic examination or.... in-hand. NO silver content, just maker mark, right?
Eric Stahlhut Posted July 13, 2008 Author Posted July 13, 2008 sorry for the late response, guys. just got home and will do my best to provide better pics tomorrow (it's dark o'clock here right now).yes rick, you are correct- this is not a silver badge. the "frosting" finish has worn away from the salient spots, leaving the base metal. cheers, gents!
Eric Stahlhut Posted July 13, 2008 Author Posted July 13, 2008 crap!~ am having a tough time w/pics..but here goes--have at it!
Eric Stahlhut Posted July 13, 2008 Author Posted July 13, 2008 you can see that the front and back pieces are starting to separate in areas. as i mentioned before, the nonmagnetic base metal is not marked for silver content. the finishing reminds me of a 'mattweis' type encountered on wound badges.
Kris D Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Here's mine for comparison, albeit by a different maker - C E Junker of Berlinhttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2008/post-4175-1215970873.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2008/post-4175-1215970841.jpg
Ferg1 Posted July 13, 2008 Posted July 13, 2008 Hi , yes those are much clearer pictures and having said that I feel that the badge is good. Probably 1920's.Ferg1.
Mike K Posted July 14, 2008 Posted July 14, 2008 I have to say the pic of the main pin in post#2 immediately struck me as classic Meybauer.RegardsMike
Stogieman Posted July 14, 2008 Posted July 14, 2008 Well, I've run through all my archives and I can't find fault here. I think we're put off by the terrible "look" as we have a buntmetal badge with very worn silver frost.
Eric Stahlhut Posted July 14, 2008 Author Posted July 14, 2008 heya--- like i said in the header: worn.never said it was especial...just a worn out 'ol badgy-badge. not a fancy one--i have a penchant for used items and variants. as you well know. anybody else have a three-vent badge? that's the primary reason i posted this thingy in the first place, btw.
Eric Stahlhut Posted July 14, 2008 Author Posted July 14, 2008 they probably had to use three vents due to the quality of the material they were using at the time. and even that didn't work very well, as the two plates are poorly joined.bet this is an early 20s example done during that period when quality materials were not readily available.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now