Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    I have a mounted bar consisting of War Medal, Victory Medal, and WW2 Defence Medal. The WW1 medals are rim marked 142970 SPR. M. BIRCH R.E. Am I correct that R.E. is Royal Engineers and what is SPR. Thanks

    Posted

    Yes, Royal Engineers. Rank is Sapper, the RE equivalent of a Private.

    He obviously was recalled for WWII service, almost certainly as Home Guards with the Defence Medal. Those records are just now coming available at the archives.

    Much information is available online. Others will probably beat me to it.

    Posted

    I have a mounted bar consisting of War Medal, Victory Medal, and WW2 Defence Medal. The WW1 medals are rim marked 142970 SPR. M. BIRCH R.E. Am I correct that R.E. is Royal Engineers and what is SPR. Thanks

    It would be nice to see your mounted medal group. :jumping:

    :beer: Doc

    Posted (edited)

    His MIC shows little, but lets us know (as we pretty much knew) that these are his complete medals for the Great War. And, more importantly, that his name was Malcolm.

    [image deleted. God save the Queen.]

    Edited by Ed_Haynes
    Posted (edited)

    Ed, While I understand how useful it is to post copies of the Medal Cards that are available from Ancestry.co.uk, may I remind you of their conditions. By showing complete copies of both sides of the medal card I believe you are infringing their rules and could leave the forum open to legal action. This has been mentioned on the BMF and it is advised to only show the front of the card.

    Here is Ancestry's terms.

    Limited Use LICENCE

    You are licensed to use the Content only for personal or professional family history research, and may download Content only as search results relevant to that research. The download of the whole or material parts of any work or database is prohibited. Resale of a work or database or portion thereof, except as specific results relevant to specific research for an individual, is prohibited. Online or other republication of Content is prohibited except as unique data elements that are part of a unique family history or genealogy. Violation of this limited use licence may result in immediate termination of your membership and may result in legal action against you. You may use the software provided on the Service only while online and may not download, copy, reuse or distribute that software, except where it is clearly stated in connection with software that it is made available for offline use, and a licence for such use is provided in connection with that software.

    Cheers,

    Mike

    Edited by Mike Huxley
    Posted

    As the management is British, they may delete it if they wish. I am not a Crown subject.

    I leave it up to them.

    The whole assertion of "Crown Copyright" over archives is complex and, in any case, one does not wish to get the forum in trouble. Nick??

    Posted

    As the management is British, they may delete it if they wish. I am not a Crown subject.

    I leave it up to them.

    The whole assertion of "Crown Copyright" over archives is complex and, in any case, one does not wish to get the forum in trouble. Nick??

    Ed, :banger: A typical gung-ho reply from you. As a person that is supposed to protect the interests of the forum I would have thought you would have taken the appropriate action yourself and cropped the view to just the front of the card.

    I was trying to assist the Forum from falling foul of legal action.

    But who am I ?

    Mike

    Posted

    Ed, :banger: A typical gung-ho reply from you. As a person that is supposed to protect the interests of the forum I would have thought you would have taken the appropriate action yourself and cropped the view to just the front of the card.

    I was trying to assist the Forum from falling foul of legal action.

    But who am I ?

    Mike

    Fair enough. I had wanted the forum management to decide on their legal liability. Neithe I (not you) can make that decision. It makes me sorry I tried to help

    Image deleted.

    Posted (edited)

    Thank you Ed, better to be safe than sorry. I have passed this on to Leigh to discuss with the others. However it would seem that only posting a cropped view of the front of the card if it is related to an enquiry would be OK as Ancestry.co.uk are the only ones to publish both side in one view. Of course, there is no problem with you sending a full copy by email to the enquirer.

    Regards,

    Mike

    Edited by Mike Huxley
    Posted

    Thank you Ed, better to be safe than sorry. I have passed this on to Leigh to discuss with the others. However it would seem that only posting a cropped view of the front of the card if it is related to an enquiry would be OK as Ancestry.co.uk are the only ones to publish both side in one view.

    Regards,

    Mike

    No, the main (US-based) ancestry site also makes it available. The assertion of such restrictive copyright over public archives is an interesting and even quaint issue. I have been helping the Indian Council on Historical Records raise this, as "Crown Copyright" is asserted over records in London, but if you consult the same identical records in New Delhi, what possible rights does HM retain?!

    I was merely trying to help the original poster. I would have preferred a ruling by the forum management, but . . . .

    Posted

    The fact that he has a defence medal doesn't necesarily mean he was recalled to active service with the home guard he could have been a member of the ARP or one of many other organization which qualified for "just" the defence medal

    Posted

    The fact that he has a defence medal doesn't necesarily mean he was recalled to active service with the home guard he could have been a member of the ARP or one of many other organization which qualified for "just" the defence medal

    True. Good point. I gather many of these records are graduuuuaaaaallllllyyyyyy being released. Maybe someday we'll know.

    Posted

    Nice simple group thats got a story behind it if one knows where to look. Start with ancestry and the NA for ww1 if you kind find an obituary online you may be able to gain some clues as to what he did in ww2.

    Cheers

    Chris

    Posted

    As Ed posted, the MIC gives the additional first name of Malcolm, apart from the Medal Roll reference of RE/101B7716418 for the BWM & Victory & an unusual little entry of 13/11/51 nothing else.

    Buck passed to the Chairman re Ancestry copyright.

    Posted

    Guys

    I will look into this issue and see what the exact pitfalls may be.

    Please let us know, Nick. No desire to get GMIC into trouble, but much desire to help and answer queries. The complex legal issues of real and asserted international copyright in an internet age just haven't matured. But as you (and the board) are in the UK . . . ???

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.