Stogieman Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 Ed, that one's a beauty...... Bob, pretty much every higher Mongolian Badge/Order has those symbols in there somewhere. I believe they are all part of a national shield/crest. I'm sure I/we will be quickly corrected.................. please pardon our inexperience!
Gerd Becker Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 (edited) Beautiful and impressive order, Ed Gerd Edited December 20, 2005 by Gerd Becker
Vatjan Posted December 20, 2005 Author Posted December 20, 2005 (edited) The crest is indeed the national symbol, as it was used in the early forties.The four animals depicted are of course the four domesticated species the Mongolians keep in their herds:Cows, sheep, goats and camels. I think the symbolism of the horseman speaks fo itself, all I can add is that the stick with the bit of rope the rider is carrying is the Mongolian equivalent of the lasso. It is used to capture wild horses, and still very much in use nowadays.I've got a pic somewhere, but I'm afraid it is a slide, so it might take some time to digitalize. JanPS: Santa must really like you, Ed Edited December 20, 2005 by vatjan
Stogieman Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) My Mongolian Best Herder Badge arrived from Germany of all places today. A most impressive piece of enamel work, only appreciated in hand. There's an earlier style than this that is extremely crude....This one is numbered 3660 Edited January 5, 2006 by stogieman
Gerd Becker Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 My Mongolian Best Herder Badge arrived from Germany of all places today. A most impressive piece of enamel work, only appreciated in hand. There's an earlier style than this that is extremely crude....This one is numbered 3660Very nice Rick, you are hooked Gerd
Vatjan Posted January 5, 2006 Author Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) Hooked, indeed Then this might not be a good time to tell you there are several variations of this badge. Apparantly they were first made of silver, then silvered bronze, then silver again.Serial numbers starting at +-4100 have a flatback instead of a mirror reverse, expect to pay more, because I think only a few hundred of these exist.Also, normally the blue enamel is light blue opaque, but some badges, around the 3500 mark, have this nice translucent darker blue enamel. Yours is a good exemple of these.Congratulations on your nice badge happy hunting for the variations Jan Edited January 5, 2006 by vatjan
HuliganRS Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 The early badges are just great!Well designed and executed!Rusty.
Stogieman Posted January 6, 2006 Posted January 6, 2006 Here's a few more of my Mongolian Badges. I bought them on a whim!
Danny Posted January 7, 2006 Posted January 7, 2006 GuysAre Mongolian badges being Faked? If so, as much as the Soviet ones?
Bob Hunter Posted January 7, 2006 Posted January 7, 2006 Although Mongolian is not an area of interest for me I find the Best Herder Badge to be very interesting.
Stogieman Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 Mongolian Honorary Labor Medal.......... but, is it 3596? Or 5596? Type 1 !!
Vatjan Posted January 11, 2006 Author Posted January 11, 2006 Mongolian Honorary Labor Medal.......... but, is it 3596? Or 5596? Type 1 !!This is a Type 1 Variation 2. Very nice medalVariation 1 has "N?" written in front of the serial numberJan
Stogieman Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 Hi Jan, can you tell what the number is??Thanks!
Vatjan Posted January 11, 2006 Author Posted January 11, 2006 Hi Jan, can you tell what the number is??Thanks!I have no idea, sorry , I would say it is a 3, but I can't be sureJanThis is a Variation 1
Ed_Haynes Posted January 11, 2006 Posted January 11, 2006 I'd vote for a "5596". Can you do a BIG scan of just the number?
Guest Rick Research Posted January 12, 2006 Posted January 12, 2006 Bigger isn't any better, I'm afraid. That "skip" is still a skip no matter how big it gets because there is no "there" there. It's not wear, it's absence of engraving. I don't know why they didn't stamp these nicely instead of nail-file scratching them! It's hard to tell in "natural color" because of shading interference and the wear scratches[attachmentid=22465]But when I use my Awesome Ricky Powers, the actual marks are clearer (if disconcertingly raised looking, complete with scratches turned into junior high school microscope slide bacteria, eekies!)[attachmentid=22466]A double 55, I'd say--just the top of the first one is squooshed closer so not as long.
Stogieman Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 Which places it ??????????? The timeline on these and others never seems to really match up with the serial numbers to specific eras!
Vatjan Posted January 13, 2006 Author Posted January 13, 2006 Which places it ??????????? The timeline on these and others never seems to really match up with the serial numbers to specific eras!I would say, this is a early 1950's award, I can't be more precise at the moment.If I find more info I'll let you know Jan
Vatjan Posted January 15, 2006 Author Posted January 15, 2006 This just arrived in my mailbox.A very rare sports/wrestling badge.I've only seen 2 in my 5 years of collecting, one in Dr B's book, and then this one Jan
Vatjan Posted January 15, 2006 Author Posted January 15, 2006 Your mailbox must be very happy, Jan! EdNo forum-smilie is large enough to represent the large grin me & my mailbox have been wearing since this arrived Jan
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now