Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    I remember these being discussed a few years back and Frank Heukemes being "on the fence" about them until he actually saw one then condemned it as fake. The was partly because of the strange base material (not being Zinc but some other alloy) and the final killing blow being that the hinge and hook were integral to the badge, not separately applied, in other words the entire thing was a cleverly done casting.

    However, this example clearly IS Zinc, and has separately applied fittings (the hinge and hook are rusted so cannot be one-piece with the Zinc body of the badge.) so there must be more than one version of this badge in existence.

    This one certainly has the look of age, but given the controversy around them, they certainly aren't unquestioned as a genuine variant.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It is very unusual, but I see nothing about the detail, materials, and construction that rule it out(based upon the photos) as been a period piece. Perhaps a very rare varient? What is the marking on the reverse?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I remember these being discussed a few years back and Frank Heukemes being "on the fence" about them until he actually saw one then condemned it as fake. The was partly because of the strange base material (not being Zinc but some other alloy) and the final killing blow being that the hinge and hook were integral to the badge, not separately applied, in other words the entire thing was a cleverly done casting.

    However, this example clearly IS Zinc, and has separately applied fittings (the hinge and hook are rusted so cannot be one-piece with the Zinc body of the badge.) so there must be more than one version of this badge in existence.

    This one certainly has the look of age, but given the controversy around them, they certainly aren't unquestioned as a genuine variant.

    Many thanks . For the present we remain in a state of uncertainty .

    PS I have come across a type very clear

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.