Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    LW Tank battlle badge in black document

    Recommended Posts

    This came up for sale! Any comments?

    Andreas, I'd suggest any error here, should be on the side of caution.

    The fellow was supposed to be in a "Begleit" or escort unit and he's awarded a -flak- badge? Escort units might have anti-aircraft support (m.g.s, and trailer hauled anti-aircraft 20mm guns, but probably nothing larger than that), and personnel in the unit would not likely be in a position to be a Flak "gunner", and so on. At one point he's a flak crew member, and at another point he's serving on a "Panzer" and eligible for a tank assault badge? I'm not so sure someone would be moved around from one specialized piece of equipment to another type of service requiring a whole new set of skills. Could happen, but in this particular case, I'd be leery given the potential value of the docs if real.

    Another thing that bothers me is the typewriter used to prepare both documents looks like it might have been the same one. The way the unit is spelled or abbreviated might suggest the two docs were done a year or more apart, but then would the typewriter ribbon have been replaced a time or two, and therefore the amount of ink on the page be different (darker/lighter, not the same....)?

    One by itself could easily pass, while two documents allows the details on the two to be compared.

    I don't know what you're going to do, but I'd pass on these.



    Edited by Les
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That is a very good observation. Certainly the same typewriter, yet it is still the same division, so that this would make sense!

    The ink color is different, too.

    Too bad there are no rolls on those awards.

    It would certainly be amazing if this is real !

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Both docs look good to me off the face of it. As both were issued from the same office there should be no surprise if the same typewriter was used within less than 5 months of each other (remember these are european format dates not american), differences in abbreviations are also no problem. I find no issue with the combination of awards. Notice that it's the black version of the panzerkampfabzeichen which is pretty much the same as the bronze version for the army, ie. not for tank crews, had it been in silver then the point would be valid. If you can find the Kstn for for this kompanie i'm sure you'd find it included at least one flak zug of 20mm or 37mm, perhaps towed but i'd think more likely self-propelled on half-tracks.

    Otherwise i'd suggest finding the names of the Korps IIa\IIb officers. they're almost certainly the ones that signed these.

    Edited by Simon Orchard
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Another thing that bothers me is the typewriter used to prepare both documents looks like it might have been the same one. The way the unit is spelled or abbreviated might suggest the two docs were done a year or more apart, but then would the typewriter ribbon have been replaced a time or two, and therefore the amount of ink on the page be different (darker/lighter, not the same....)?

    One by itself could easily pass, while two documents allows the details on the two to be compared.

    I don't know what you're going to do, but I'd pass on these.




    I believe that upon further comaprison of both documents we have actually two typwriters here. They may be similar, but the type is not identical.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Let's see if we can unravel this. Fallschirm-Panzerkorps "Hermann G?ring" was really an administrative entity, established in Poland in September and October 1945 to support Fallschirm-Panzer-Division 1 "Hermann G?ring" and Fallschirm-Panzergrenadier-Division 2 "Hermann G?ring". Fallschirm-Panzerkorps "Hermann G?ring" was formed with elements of Fallschirm-Panzer-Division "Hermann G?ring" as cadre. A few days later, Fallschirm-Panzer-Division "Hermann G?ring" was retitled Fallschirm-Panzer-Division 1 "Hermann G?ring.

    Maybe my reference is incomplete but I cannot see a Begleit-Kompanie on the OBB of FPK HG. The only references to Begleit units that I can find in HG genealogical tree are the Begleitkompanie (z.b.V.), which was part of the Stab/Panzer-Division HG in 1943, and the Begleit-Rgt HG, formed from the Wachregiment "Hermann G?ring" in April 1944. Begleit-Rgt HG's OBB included the II.(Flak) Abt, which was became IV./Fallschirm-Flak-Regiment HG in September 1944. Brought under Corps control in October, Fsch-Flak-Rgt HG became Fallschirm-Panzerkorps Flak-Regiment HG.

    Obergefreiter Hahlweg may have served in the Flak Detachment of the Begleit-Regiment "Hermann G?ring", thereby earning the Flak Badge. Elements of the Flak being motorised, on armoured tracked vehicles, Hahlweg might have qualified for the Panzerkampfabzeichen der LW in Schwarz at some point, the Adjutant's office making sure that personnel received their due awards before the end of the war, which was obviously imminent by 26.4.1945.

    As we know, like any official documents, German documentation can and does contain errors and anomalies, especially with clerks referring to Wehrpa?e which may not have been efficiently updated. Did Hahlweg once serve in the Begleitkompanie (z.b.V) in the Panzer-Division HG in Italy in 1943? Or was he a Wachregiment veteran, who had served with the Flak Detachment of the Begleit-Regiment HG before ending up in the Korpstruppe of the Fallschirm-Panzerkorps "Hermann G?ring", in the Fallschirm-Panzerkorps Flak-Regiment HG? Whatever the case, I see no Begleitkompanie on the OOB of either Fallschirm-Panzerkorps HG or Fallschirm-Panzer-Division 1 "Hermann G?ring.

    Furthermore, the signature on the Flak Badge document can be seen on Panzer-Division HG award documents signed late in 1943 by the divisional 1a, whose name escapes me presently, who was then a Hauptmann and Adjutant under Paul Conrath. Was this officer, promoted Major by december 1944, the Adjutant of Fallschirm-Panzerkorps "Hermann G?ring"? And given that Fat Hermann wasn't to be found anywhere near the areas of operations of the divisions bearing his name towards the end of the war, why would the Fallschirm-Panzerkorps "Hermann G?ring" have included a Begleitkompanie "Hermann G?ring" on its OBB in the first place?

    Questions, questions, questions... Let me put it this way: I wouldn't buy these documents based on what I am looking at here. I will, to quote the late William Stump, "eat crow" if proven wrong but they look like clever fakes produced by someone with a little knowledge, which is always a dangerous thing. Moreover, I have never seen a convincing document of any kind related to the award of Luftwaffe Tank Badges, Sea Battle Badges, Close Combat Clasps or numbered Ground Assault Badges.


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Prosper, you actually argue for the documents with some of the things you point out. As you say, FPD HG is known to have had a begleit Kp. and as you also rightly state, elements from the division were used to form the Korps elements of the new expanded formation, quite logical the begleit Kp get moved over to korps HQ level. I think you may have your wires crossed as to the position held by this adjutant. A divisional Ia was not an adjutant, he was the chief of staff and usually held the rank of Major i.G or Oberstleutnant i.G. For PD HG in '43 it was Oberstleutnant Hellmut Bergengruen from june 43 to june 44. The two adjutants were the IIa and IIb and i think we're likely seeing the IIb here as he's an OR. Again it makes perfect sense for the man to have been a Hptm. IIb with the division, then doing the same job at korps as a major.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Guest Rick Research

    The Corps commander on 26 April 1945 was Generalleutnant Wilhelm SCHMALZ (1901-1983). I can't see any way THAT is the signature on the EK2 document. Anyone have something else he signed? Schmalz had been a brigade and then divisional commander in "Hermann G?ring" as its name was bumped up to a Corps, so there should be plenty of examples to compare with from when he was lured away from the army in 1943.

    Signature on the Flak document is "Niehoff." I don't find any Niehoff in the unpublished manuscript that Glenn found of a never printed Luftwaffe summer 1944 Seniority List, nor in the February 1945 published list of Captains up for flight/para/staff.

    Can't decipher what the autograph is on the 26.04.45 Tank document to check in the 1944 DAL list.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Do a search for Schmalz on Huesken's site, you'll find a signed photo and an EKI


    Also, PD HG included personnel from the Heer, Bergengruen for example, the Ia i mentioned was a Heer general staff officer who never transferred to the LW.

    Edited by Simon Orchard
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So the signature on the Iron Cross document actually fits, implying the material on the Huesken site is OK. The typewritter is identical in-between the tank document and the Iron Cross document!

    Edited by medalnet
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Point taken, Simon. 1a is indeed Chief-of-Staff. Rick jogged my memory. I have remembered the name of the signatory of the Flak document, whose name appears on other HG documents from 1943 onwards: Oskar Niehoff. It would be great if this LW Tank Badge document turned out to be real.


    Edited by PKeating
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This prompted a bit of recapitulation regarding the 1a designation in the Luftwaffe command structure.

    1a Chef des Stabes

    1a Op 1 Operation Offizier

    1a Op 2 Adjutant Operation Offizier

    1b Adjutant

    The Flak-Kampfabzeichen and PKA d. LW documents are signed by officers described both as "1a" and "Adjutant". With reference to Simon's post, I don?t really see how I am arguing for the LW Tank Badge document by exploring the genealogy of Fallschirm-Panzer-Korps ?Hermann G?ring?. I have not yet been able to find any reference to a Begleit-Kompanie but I did find the following OBB of the FPK HG, reproduced below, which does list a Begleit-Bataillon ?Reichsmarschall?.

    I. Generalkommando:

    Kommandierender General: Generalleutnant und ELT Wilhelm Schmalz

    Chef des Stabes: Oberstleutnant (Heer) Bern von Baer (6.10.1944 - 8.5.1945) [baer was therefore the 1a of FPK HG]

    1a: Major Werner Ebel (1.5.1945) [PK note: misprint? Surely 1b?)

    II. Korpstruppen:

    Korps-Sturmbataillon HG

    Korps-Panzerj?gerabteilung HG

    Korps-Nachrichtenabteilung HG

    Fallschirm-FlakRgt. HG (4 Abteilungen)

    I. Nachschubateilung HG

    II. Instandsetzungsabteilung HG

    Verwaltungsbataillon HG:

    Korps-Sanit?tsabteilung HG

    Korps-Feldpostamt HG

    III. Fallschirmpanzerdivision 1 HG:

    Divisionskommandeur: Generalmajor von Necker

    ab Febr. 1945: Generalmajor Lemke


    FschPzRgt. HG (2 Abteilungen)

    FschPzGrenRgt. 1 HG (2 Batl.)

    FschPzGrenRgt. 2 HG (2 Batl.)

    FschPzF?sBatl. 1 HG

    FschPzAA 1 HG

    FschPzPiBatl. 1 HG

    FschPzArtRgt. 1 HG (3 Abt.)

    FschPzNachrAbt. 1 HG

    FeldErsBatl. 1 HG

    SanAbt. 1 HG

    Feldpostamt 1 HG

    IV. Fallschirmpanzergrenadierdivision 2 HG:

    Divisionskommandeur: Generalmajor Walther


    FschStGeschAbt. HG

    FschPzGrenRgt. 3 HG (3 Batl.)

    FschPzGrenRgt. 4 (3 Batl.)

    FschPzF?sBatl. 2 HG

    FschPzAufklAbt. 2 HG

    FschPzArtRgt. 2 HG (3 Abte.)

    FschPzNachrAbt. 2 HG

    Feldersatzbatl. 2 HG

    Sanit?tsabteilung 2 HG

    Feldpostamt 2 HG

    V. Sonstige Verb?nde und Dienststellen:

    F?hrerFlakAbt. (nur noch in der ersten Zeit)

    Begleitbataillon "Reichsmarschal"

    FschPzErs. u. AusbBrigade HG mit den Regimentern 1 und 2 (bis M?rz 1945)

    Brigadekommandeur: Major Ilius

    ab Nov. Oberst Meyer

    FschPzErs. u. AusbBrig. 2 mit den Regimentern 3 und 4 (ab M?rz 1945)

    Brigadekommandeur: Oberst Breuer

    ab April 1945: Gen. d. FschTr. Br?uer

    Ers. u. AusbRgt. HG in Hollan

    Heimatstab FschPzKorps HG, Berlin-Reinickendorf

    Leichtkranken-Lazarette (Erholungsheime) in Oberau u. Reit i. Winkel)

    The Begleit-Bataillon "Reichsmarschall? was formed on 5.1.1945 and comprised:


    2. Flak-Batterie

    3. Grenadier-Ausbildungs-Kompanie

    4. Grenadier-Ausbildungs-Kompanie

    5. Kraftfahr-Ausbildungs-Kompanie

    6. Kraftfahr-Ausbildungs-Kompanie

    7. Versehrten-Kompanie

    The 12.2.1944 Flak document, apparently signed by Major Oskar Niehoff, refers to this Begleit-Kompanie. Perhaps there was a Begleit-Kompanie on the Korps strength at the time but I have been unable to find any reference to it. As for the Tank Badge document, we know that there are plenty of German documents containing clerical errors. Assuming that there was a Begleit-Kompanie on the Korps OBB at some point between October 1944 and early January 1945, perhaps the clerk who prepared the document was working from a Wehrpa? or a Soldbuch that had not been updated.

    The Begleit-Btl ?Reichsmarschall? was disbanded late in March 1945. So it was no longer on strength when Hahlweg was allegedly awarded the Panzerkampfabzeichen der LW. This begs the question: why would the Korps retain any Reichsmarschall-related escort sub-unit on strength after March 1945? On 24.4.1945, Hermann G?ring was under house arrest in the Obersalzburg, a long way from the Korps bearing his name, following his attempt to declare himself F?hrer.

    I?m sorry, guys, but this grouping just doesn?t hang together convincingly for me. I suspect that it is a genuine group ?enhanced? by the addition of some quite well done fakes, that would fool the average collector but fail to stand up to serious scrutiny. Perhaps I am wrong. Perhaps it is all genuine. But there are just too many anomalies. it reminds me of a cleverly executed SS-Fallschirmj?ger grouping, where the faker had used genuine blank documents, period typewriters and so on, and had placed the man more or less in the right places but at the wong time. Moreover, he had given the man too special a rank and this helped to debunk the grouping, which had cost a collector a lot of money.

    Another problem concerns the EK2 document. The signature is very convincing, the green chinagraph notwithstanding. Like Felix Steiner, Wilhelm Schmalz liked to use chinagraph mapmarkers when signing award documents. Perhaps he was all out of blue chinagraphs. Anyway, that's a side issue. It has been pointed out that the same typewriter was used on the EK2 and PKA d. LW documents. That's fine, but the omission of "den" suggests different typists. Fine, no problem with that. But the awards on the same day would suggest a link.

    Perhaps Schmalz and his officers felt, imminent defeat aside, that the days of their Korps were numbered, given the arrest of G?ring. Departing commanders often caught up on overdue awards before they left. If Generalleutnant Schmalz was signing award documents on 26.4.1945, surely the two documents to Obergefreiter Hahlweg awaiting signatures and stamps would have been presented to Schmalz together? Moreover, the award of even a figurative PKA d. LW would have been quite a special occasion.

    Sure, from the average fellow's viewpoint, this all looks great. The stamps look right. The signatures are convincing. Etcetera?etcetera?etcetera? But it just doesn?t hang together. The elements are all there but sewn together like Frankenstein?s monster. Very cunning trap! Flak?Begleit?Begleit-Kompanie... Were the Flak document to IV./Fallschirm-Flak-Rgt ?Hermann G?ring? and the Tank Badge document to 2./Begleit-Btl ?Reichsmarschall? or 2./Begleit-Btl./Fallschirm-Panzer-Korps "Hermann G?ring", perhaps in March rather than April 1945, the grouping would be even more dangerous than it already is.

    I'm inclined to believe the Wound Badge document and, perhaps, the Flak Badge document, if it can be shown that there was a Begleit-Kompanie on the OBB of FPK HG at the end of 1944. There might have been. It might have been the cadre sub-unit for the formation of Begleit-Btl "Reichsmarschall". I might even believe the EK2 document, were it not for the fact that the same typewriter appears to have been used for this document and for the Tank Badge document.


    Edited by PKeating
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Something like a kompanie can be very hard to pick up in references, i can give you dozens and dozens of examples of small kompanie or zug sized korps or armee level units that simply never appear in secondary sources. For this i would want to see a proper original gliederung but the clue is in the mention of the division having one prior to the creation of the korps, when elements of the division were used to create the Korps stab.

    The Flak-Kampfabzeichen and PKA d. LW documents are signed by officers described both as "1a" and "Adjutant".

    Incorrect, what you see is the abbreviation I.A or Im Auftrag. Perfectly correct when an officer is signing on behalf of a higher authority.

    Forget the begleitbataillon Reichsmarschall, it's nothing to do with this group and you've turned it into a red hearing.

    Forget the colour of the EKII signature, it's a poor scan with bad contrast\brightness

    Just because the LW PKA is extremely rare doesn't mean it was viewed as anything other than a normal combat badge like the Heer PKA, in fact this is only a LW version of a bronze panzerkampfabzeichen. In other words, Schmalz was the right person to sign the EKII because that was the correct authority to do so. The Korps Adjutant (IIb, apologies if LW ground formations used different abbreviations for their staff officers but the job is the same) would be the right person to deal with the lesser award for something like an escort company attached to korps HQ. There's no problem at all in the apparent use of the same typewriter coming from the same headquarters.

    In short the group hangs together perfectly well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I don't really see how the Begleit-Btl "Reichsmarschall" can be a red herring, given that it is the only escort unit that appears on the ORBAT of the Korps at any time. If the group looks right to you, that's fine by me. As I said, it would be great if it were genuine.


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Of course not. Another thing one has to bear in mind is that not a single credible researcher or collector who has met veterans of Luftwaffe ground forces, be they Fallschirmj?ger, LW-Feld-Division or "Herman G?ring" Division/Korps, has encountered anyone who was awarded or recalls any comrades being receiving a Luftwaffe Close Combat Badge, a Luftwaffe Sea Battle Badge, Luftwaffe numbered Ground Assault Badges or Luftwaffe Tank Battle Badges.

    It is rather like the Army Balloonist Badges or the Low Flying Aircraft Destruction Badges. Concerning the latter, some veterans put up 1957 ribbon bar versions to mark their award of the General Assault Badge for this feat of arms but they were not serving in the Bundeswehr when they did so and taking this liberty was akin to Royal Air Force ground crew veterans wearing the "Battle of Britain" bar on their 1939-1945 Stars at rallies after the war. They may have deserved the distinction but they never received it.

    There were Luftwaffe men, including Hermann G?ring, who felt resentful about the lack of Luftwaffe badges to recognise certain achievements. This is why Hermann G?ring instituted these badges in November 1944. A few convincing-looking examples have appeared on the market from time to time and there are also some 1957-style versions but it is highly unlikely that any such badges were available before 9.5.1945. This is not unusual: The Warsaw Shield was instituted in December 1944 and never saw a soldier's arm. The Lappland Shield was instituted in February 1945 but had to be produced locally as no official versions were forthcoming. In the case of the Lappland Shield, awards and documentation thereof possible because the units in question had more time on their hands than their comrades on the Western, Eastern and Southern Fronts.

    The one or two Luftwaffe groups involving October 1944 badges that were convincing enough to find their way into advanced collections in the past few years found their back out of those collections very quickly indeed once they were subjected to very close scrutiny. Coming back to the Hahlweg group, I haven't yet asked George Petersen, who is one of the foremost authorities on the "Hermann G?ring" in all its forms, but I have asked a few other people to check their files and we keep coming back to this slightly awkward lack of a Begleit-Kompanie on the ORBAT, as well as signatures that raise one or two eyebrows. Minor clerical errors are one thing but if there was no Escort Company on the books, one cannot really see Lieutenant-General Schmalz or his Corps Adjutant signing a document to a man in a non-existent unit!

    I think this is a case of someone building a group around a genuine document, based on some of the research - well, let's call it recapitulation in my case - I did for my above posts and not quite getting it right. Close, but no banana, as one might say. Were this group absolutely unquestionable, it would have found eager buyers in the top echelons of collecting, unless it had an utterly outrageous reserve price on it. Obviously, the serious HG collectors had doubts. As I said, it would be great if this group turned out to be genuine but the odds are very much against it, for the reasons outlined here.


    Edited by PKeating
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For everyone's general interest, in the light of this discussion, here is a rather good article on the Army Balloon Badge by the late W C Stump, who sent it to me for proof-reading. This is just as he sent it. It is worth recalling for the simple reason that as well as fakes of accredited medals and badges, we are now facing attempts to introduce or 'rehabilitate' high end fakes and fantasy pieces, as the recent "Rounder" Knight's Cross affair showed us.

    We have also seen attempts - involving the same shills who figured in the Rounder affair - to convince newer generations of collectors that well-made 1960s Condor Legion Tank Badges (a small run probably commissioned by the veterans' association) are wartime pieces because of their resemblance to a retouched photo in a wartime catalogue. Someone has produced and aged some convincing-looking zinc "November 1944" Luftwaffe combat badges, complete with late war-style cardboard boxes. And desktop publishing technology has seen a rise in fake paperwork and 'enhanced' original paperwork, with a lot of the best examples coming from the Hamburg area. Some of these fake documents have been good enough to almost catch out some highly experienced collectors.

    So read Bill Stump's study of the Army Balloon Badge and bear in mind that with the massive interest in Third Reich memorabilia since 1945, it is highly unlikely that any great new discoveries will be made now. Were this group genuine, we would have seen other such award documents or credible entries in paybooks before now.

    Fakers favour units like the "Hermann G?ring" because so many of its members ended up in Soviet captivity. It's a bit like the documents one sees from time to time, purporting to be from members of Fallschirmj?ger-Bataillon "Brandenburg", recently discovered in former Soviet archives. I am surprised that this grouping did not have an "ex-Soviet Union" provenance. Perhaps it will acquire such a provenance for its next outing.

    Some of you might find this thread, on another forum, illuminating: http://www.feldgrau.net/forum/viewtopic.ph...=a&start=30



    (Ballonbeobachterabzeichen des Heeres)

    A Comprehensive Study

    Copyright ? W. C. Stump 2002

    The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge has proved to be one of the most interesting of all the military badges in the Third Reich era of Germany. Finding factual evidence to prove if the badge was produced for the troops in finished form during WW II or if it was never produced at all has been challenging. From the very first reference book published on the topic of German military awards of the Third Reich era, information about this badge has been sparse, to say the least. All subsequent reference books to date have added little new information.

    This is due to a lack of factual information, and to each new author relying on the same information used by previous authors to make his assertions. All authors have relied primarily on information supplied by one pioneer researcher of the last century, Dr. Phil. Kurt-Gerhard Kleitmann.

    Dr Kleitmann?s lifetime work included the founding of the Institute for the Scientific Research Study of Orders and Awards. The Institute housed a vast amount of information relating to orders, medals and decorations of the world. His worldwide recognition stemmed from his many books and articles, spanning over 45 years. He was also an honorary member of numerous collecting associations, including the prestigious Orders and Medals Society of America. He was even awarded the Service Cross of the German Bundesrepublik.

    Sadly, despite all the accolades he received, some of Dr Kleitmann?s research and findings are open to question, his statements about the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge included. History will judge his errors and have the final word as to whether his errors were genuine mistakes or deliberate acts of misrepresentation of the facts. In any event, what Dr Kleitmann said about the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge should be corrected. Hopefully I can show through this investigative report how the errors of the past have caused a gross distortion of the truth about the possible production and awarding of this badge.


    In many cases, speculative rumors, fabrications and fairy tales, restated over and over again, tend to end up being accepted as fact unless someone steps up and challenges this. The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge and its place in the history of Third Reich military awards is just one example. No factual proof exists to support the contention that this late war military award was ever produced or was issued before May 1945.

    This lack of factual information has caused this badge to be the subject of continuous debate ever since the late 1960s. There are various types of supposedly or allegedly original Army Balloon Observer Badge in private collections and on dealers? lists, ranging from fairly obvious fakes made in considerable numbers to high-quality pieces that crop up less frequently. One of the more prolific manufactures of better quality postwar copies of 3rd Reich medals and badges was the Austrian firm of Rudolf Souval of Vienna. Souval produced fake ABOBs as long ago as 1946. Their first effort was a fairly crude, cast, flat-backed design with the classic postwar Souval hook.

    To date, of all badges I have seen, three distinctly different variations have been listed as original badges produced during the last few months of WWII. I hope to put to rest the ongoing controversy surrounding these badges by taking all factual evidence known and let it stand as the basis for the acceptance or non acceptance of this badge in the history of WWII German military decorations and awards.


    In the late 1960?s, I first encountered examples of Army Balloon Observer?s badge on my first trip to Europe. Up until this trip and after having collected Third Reich orders, medals and other decorations for near twenty years, I had never heard of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge much less seen one. However, I purchased a total of six sets of each class of this badge from two separate dealers on this trip. I found them in England and they were bronze die struck badges and had the "beard or hump" on the left side of the wing of the eagle. At my first meeting with K. G. Klietmann, noted German researcher and historian, I first learned about this badge and its history. He told me explicitly that the badge never reached the production stage, but the Reich?s Orders Chancellery had approved an accepted design for the badge. He gave me a photograph of the design matrix and said that only one example had survived the war and it was in the hands of the original designer of the badge. I later learned that the designer was Ellmar Lang. Dr. Klietmann?s statement was printed in one of his books and in magazine articles he wrote, which I will cover later. His information was enough to convince me not to add these badges to my collection as original period badges. On other trips I was again offered these badges, but declined to purchase them due what I found out about them from Dr. Klietmann. At that time, I had examples of all but a few of the known Third Reich military and political orders, medals, badges and decorations. (See Exhibit No. 1)


    It was also in late 1968 that I added the first modern detailed reference book, printed in the English language and dealing with the subject of Third Reich orders and medals, to my reference library. It was a book entitled ORDERS, DECORATIONS, MEDALS AND BADGES OF THE THIRD REICH, (Including the Free City of Danzig). Two pioneer authors, David Littlejohn and COL. C. M. Dodkins, both from England, authored the book. The book was produced by another pioneer collector and publisher, R. James Bender, San Jose, California. Mr. Bender had produced two other books by that time, both dealing with Third Reich collectibles. They were THE WAFFEN-SS and DAGGERS, BAYONETS & FIGHTING KNIVES OF HITLER?S GERMANY. A man who would continue writing reference books into the next century authored the latter. His name was Major John R. Angolia. I will cover his contribution to our subject later in my report.

    Collectors in American, and the throughout the collecting world, welcomed the book by Dodkins and Littlejohn. Up until their book, the only guidebook on the subject available here in America was a paper backed book published in 1958, NAZI DECORATIONS AND MEDALS ? 1933 -1945, by James A. Sawicki. Mr. Sawicki was one of the pioneer American collectors of the day. No mention was made about a "Army Balloon Observer?s Badge" by Sawiski in his book. It was in Dodkins and Littlejohn?s book that the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge was first featured. Oddly, the photograph they presented was not the photograph of the badge Dr. Kleitmann has shown me earlier in the year, but was of a completely different badge that I immediately recognized as being one of the reproductions then on the market. They listed the date of institution of July 8th, 1944, and stated that it came in three classes, bronze, silver and gold. In their acknowledgments and credits they dedicated their book to none other than Dr. K. G. Klietmann. It was in this book that the false information, the photograph of a badge other than the original matrix, which fostered the mystery surrounding this badge to this day. The seed of false information planted in this book only grew with each new reference book that followed. (See Exhibit No. 2 and 2-A.)


    On my first trip to England in 1968, I met an old gentleman in a military relic shop, in the antique district of Islington, who was selling a British Commando knife to the owner of the shop. I waited until he had sold his knife and followed him out to the street. I asked him if he had any other war relics and he said that he had once owned most of all the medals that was awarded by Nazi Germany, but had sold all of them long ago. He informed me that he was a former officer in the British Intelligence Service and all he had left of his collection was a scrapbook that he had compiled during the war. He said that he had made detailed hand-drawn sketches, which he colored with watercolors, of all the medals and badges that he had encountered up to and through 1945. He further stated that he lived only a few blocks from the shop and agreed to let me look at his book. We walked the few blocks to his apartment and he produced the most fascinating manuscript I had ever seen. He agreed to sell me the book, which I still have today, and it is a one of a kind masterpiece of hand-drawn art. He had sketched, to actual size, every medal and badge he had in his collection. He, however, did not have a drawing or any mention of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge in his book, although he had listed every other known badge from the Third Reich era. Of the total number of badges and medals he had sketched and colored the last few drawings were never colored, and tend to lend to the nostalgia of this most unusual record of the medals his enemy produced during WWII. When the war ended for him so did his work on his project.


    In 1976 the next step in the evolution of modern reference books, recording the history of orders, medals, badges and other decorations produced during the Third Reich era, came when LTC. John R. Angolia produced the first of his two-volume set of books, FOR FUHRER AND FATHERLAND. The first volume covered all the military awards of the Third Reich. Volume 2 was published in 1978 and covered the civil and political awards. I was personally involved with his project in that I contributed extensively by providing information, photographs and other information to Mr. Angolia.

    From the middle 1960?s I had been compiling information and photographs for a planned book project of my own. I had traveled extensively throughout the United States and Europe gathering information, visiting museums, conducting interviews with not only knowledgeable fellow collectors, but with living participants of World War II, both allied and former enemies alike. However, due to personal priorities taking precedence over producing a book, I sold my personal collection that had been a major part of my life for so many years and abandoned my book project. Not to see all my years of work go to waste, I turned over all my information and photographs to John R. Angolia when I found out that he was planning to produced his own reference on the subject. He incorporated my research with his to produce the FOR FUHRER AND FATHERLAND series.


    The mystery is further perpetuated with Angolia?s coverage of the badge. As I knew the badge as pictured by Dodkins and Littlejohn was not the same badge that Kr. Klietmann had in his files in 1968, I never added that particular badge to my collection. I had also seen reproductions of the badge being sold as early as 1965, but they were crude cast badges that I later found out were made by the firm of Rudolf Souval, Vienna, Austria, under the direction of Ludwig Umlauf. Angolia most likely acquired one of the reproduction badges or a photograph of the one he featured in his book from Dr. Klietmann or Christopher Farlowe. His photographs depicted the same version of the Army Balloon Observers Badge as was featured by Dodkins and Littlehohn. Klietmann was also given credit for assisting Angolia with his book, as was my old English friend, Christopher Farlowe. I had purchase copies of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badges from Chris as well as the notorious Luftwaffe Sea Battle Badge, Luftwaffe Tank Battle Badge, and the Luftwaffe Close Combat Badge. Angolia featured all these badges as being original WWII produced badges. I never knew that Angolia was planning on featuring these as originals until after his book was published. The majority of all experienced collectors and researchers are aware that these badges featured in FOR FUHRER AND FATHERLAND, are reproductions and regard them as such.


    In 1981, Dr. Klietmann published a book, AUSZEICHNUNGEN DES DEUTSCHEN REICHES, 1936-1945. On page 123 he wrote that he had only seen one badge that was owned by the designer. He took or obtained a photograph of that badge. I never had a copy of this book at the time; thus having no knowledge of the "new" information Dr. Klietmann had presented to the collecting world. I was now concentrating on collecting United States aviation wings and Soviet Russian orders and medals of WWII. It was also during this time that I was involved and concentrating on a new business venture and having serious health problems. All this prevented me from keeping up with the happening in the field of Third Reich medals. (See Exhibit No. 3.)


    The next two reference books on Third Reich orders and medals to gain my attention were Christopher Ailsby?s COMBAT MEDALS OF THE THIRD REICH, published in 1987. The other was Adrian Forman?s first book in his now three volume series, FORMAN?S GUIDE TO THIRD REICH GERMAN AWARDS...AND THIER VALUES published in 1988. I always tried to add all new books to my reference library, as they become available. However, with these two new books, I little more than gazed through them before placing them on the bookshelf in my library, never reading either seriously until 1997. It was in the spring of 1997, while home-bound after undergoing a heart transplant and looking at months of recuperation that I had more than enough time to catch up on my reading. I also resumed my research and upgrading my files to wile away the hours being forced to remain at home to recuperate from my many months of surgery and hospital care.


    I became involved with the wonderful medium of the Internet during my retirement and recuperation and became an active member of the Wehrmacht Awards and Decoration Forum. One of the most interesting topics to be discussed was the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge. Recalling my experiences with this badge and the early reproduction badges produced over 30 years ago, which are now cherished by many collectors today as original, I turned to my research files and memory to enable me to interject my thoughts on the forum about this badge. My memories were not enough to factually present and interject my views and opinions into the discussion. Fortunately, I had my reference library and photographic files to rely on to make my case. So I began to review what the various authors had written about the Army Balloon Observer?s badge over the past 30 years. After reviewing the material I had, I quickly realized that a major problem faced me. I had to overcome the many jumbled and twisted facts, intertwined with false information and speculation, to show that what many thought were original items of the war years or were nothing but post-war reproductions or "wolves in sheep?s clothing". Despite countless debates occurring over a period of nearly a year, the debates yielded little or no progress in determining what was original or reproduction or what was fact or fantasy. I decided to try to reach an acceptable conclusion based on documented facts alone. If this could be done, I knew it would erase a 30-year or older mystery. I knew the task would be a monumental one and no matter what conclusion I reached at the end of the investigation, not everyone would agree with. Yet, by using only documented facts, logic and conducting an unbiased investigation, I could then hope to achieve an acceptable conclusion. I have my opinions, and others will have theirs, but opinions are not allowed anymore than hearsay evidence in a court of law. The forum isn?t a court of law and this report won?t be binding ordnance. I am sure that at the conclusion of my investigation the mystery will be solved. At the very least, everyone can better understand the true history of this award and decided for themselves if the badge was produced or not during the war years.


    On July the 8th, 1944, the High Command of the German Army, OKW, authorized the introduction of the Army Balloon Observers Badge to award officers and men of the field artillery balloon observer units while on active front-line duty. Together with the procedural instructions this authorization was published in the "Allgemeine Herrresmitteilungen" (General Army Commutations) with date of August 7th, 1944. The badge was to acknowledge the extremely hazardous duty of directing artillery fire and observation while observing from a two to three man gondola hanging from a gas filled balloon. Cables suspended the balloons on the ground to heights from 300 to 1000 meters. Although the German artillery units had been using balloon observation units throughout the war, the troops did not have a distinctive qualification badge to indicate their proficiency and specialized duty. Up until the date of institution of a special badge in recognition of their service the War Merit Cross was awarded for their bravery. The criteria for the bestowal of the Iron Cross did not apply to the balloon observers. The majority of the Army Balloon Observer units were stationed on the Eastern Front especially in the later years of the war until 1945.

    For the Officers and men serving in the Army?s Balloon Observer Battalions during World War II it was a very dangerous duty in the best of conditions. These observers perched in gondolas hanging from gas filled balloons in heights sometimes ranging as high as 1500 feet in the air. Their primary duty was to act as artillery spotters for the artillery units. In the early days of the war the Luftwaffe provided adequate protection for the observer units. However, as the war progressed, and the Luftwaffe no longer ruled the skies over the battlefields of Europe, the danger increased and the observer units became prime targets from not only ground fire, but from enemy aircraft. This duty subjected the officers and men to ever increasing danger.


    A member of this daring unit best describes the duty of an Army Balloon Observer. He was a former artillery officer and regimental commander, Oberst and Kdr. Of Pz. A. R. 93, and a German Cross in Gold winner. His name was Oberst A. D. Hans Joachim Froben. The following is the translation of the text as it was published in the Deutsches Soldatenjahrbuch (The German Soldiers Yearbook), in the early 1980?s. Oberst Froben also described his service to Dr. Klietmann for his 1981 book, AUSZEICHNUNGEN DES DEUTSCHEN REICHES, 1936-1945. This translation does not make a claim to professional accuracy, but faithfully reflects the contents of the article. The following is just as it was published and was translated for me by my friend and fellow researcher, Bernhard H. Holst, who is also an expert translator.

    "Alone at a height of 900 ?1,500 feet was the balloon observer in a wicker basket with a strapped on parachute. The basket hung just below a balloon, which was first charged with 1,500 cubic meters then 600 cbm of highly flammable gas with the valve release cord and the parachute ripcord fastened in close proximity to the edge of the basket. The observer surveyed a large area by day and by night, in windy and cold conditions for many hours. He himself was visible from afar and practically invited enemy fighter attacks and artillery file. Evan though friendly antiaircraft gave protection; sudden enemy action was to be anticipated. In extreme cases the observer was perhaps able to use the parachute, but some observers were wounded while descending or were caught by his crashing and burning balloon.

    Of course the balloon filled with flammable gas was not a modern reconnaissance means, but had the advantage over a fast moving plane to be able to survey a larger area from one point and was practically unnoticeable during the night. It is noted here that the western allies used balloons in 1939/40 and the eastern enemy until 1945.

    The importance was the observations on strength and direction of the enemy; road and rail traffic; troop, armor and material concentrations and more. The shortest route to higher command transmitted these observations. The observer directly supported friendly forces by: continuous reports of movements on the battlefield, occasionally in operations against partisans, ranging shots by own artillery on recognized enemy artillery and mortar positions, armor concentrations and others. Observers could not even see many of these targets on the ground.

    During the first years of WW II there were no special recognition for these performances which were equally appreciated by higher command and the troops in the field. Because the criteria for the bestowal of the Iron Cross did not apply to the balloon observers, only the War Merit Cross, introduced for less exciting war service, could be received. Thoughts about the introduction of a special distinctive badge wee made early on but did not proceed further because no one thought of a long duration of the war and the number of possible recipients was also very small. I relinquished command of Pz.A.R. 93 in September of 1943 to assume a position on the staff of the "General der Artillerie" (general in charge of all artillery matters) namely that of Director of Group III (Reconnaissance/Observation Branch of the several branches making up the artillery arm). My Predecessor, Oberst Meredikes, among other matters asked me to pursue a distinctive badge for the balloon observers. The growing air superiority of the enemy caused more dangers to the observers and it was high time to do something for them.

    Once I understood the many chores of my assignment within such a large staff I sought out the applicable office for the creation of new distinctions and found it in the Group P 5 of the Herrespersonalamt (army personnel office). Soon I had the opportunity for personal contact with the director of that group. During the conversations he suggested that a respective formulation be worked up. He believed that a performance badge (Leistungsabzeichen) would be authorized even for only the small group, of eligible personnel.

    Now I had to envision what bestowal criteria for the performance evaluation of balloon observers on active front line duty were to be. Because I myself had no experience as an observer I effected the detachment to my staff of an experienced officer, Oberleutnant Uhde who was soon presented. As a result of out consultations and calculations we established criteria based on a point system. Thereby the importance of the observer reports and the targets engaged for the high command, and for the troops directly supported as well as the personal effort of the observer, were evaluated. Duration of the observation mission and the exposure to enemy planes or artillery played a role also. For example, every enemy target engaged and every four hours observation duration recorded were valued at one point. The first evacuation by parachute during a combat mission for compelling reason, brought ten points and every subsequent one five points were received. Three grades of the badge were established: Grade I in Bronze for twenty points, Grade II in Silver forty-five points and Grade III in gold seventy-five points. Only the highest grade awarded was to be worn on the left breast, if applicable to the left of the Assault badge. All this was brought into agreement with the awards section and it was able to judge this aspect: artillery commanders (division/corps level), commander of the observation battalion or the battery commander. Basis for the evaluation was to be the Balloon diaries kept up at platoon level. The applications for the award were to be made to the "General der Artillerie" in the OKH. From there the award document and the badges were then to be sent directly to the applying formation.

    On July 8th, 1944, the OKH authorized the introduction of the Balloon Observer Badge in recognition of the performance by the observers while on active front-line duty. Together with the procedural instructions this authorization was published in the "Allgemeine Herrresmitteilungen" (General Army Commutations) with date of 7. August, 1944. The efforts to establish a visible recognition of the commitment of the observers in the balloon baskets were thereby concluded.

    The manufacture of the badge was entrusted by orders and awards group to a jeweler in Dresden. Of two samples presented to me I selected one for the final manufacturer, twenty to forty of each grade was to be made. Repeatedly badges were bestowed by the "General der Artillery" and the respective documents were sent out. If actual badges were delivered, I do not know because I was reassigned to the command of an artillery regiment in early 1945."

    At this point in the investigation, one must ask themselves some serious questions. Is the award document pictured in Dr. Klietmann?s book and Adrian Foreman?s books the same document, stamped with the unit seal in the same place and position, and signed by the same person? The small number of badges apparently ordered to be manufactured was so small was the likelihood of any substantial number of them to have survived the war, if actually produced possible? All evidence seems to indicate that no badges were sent to recipients by the time of the officer in charge of ordering the badges, Oberest Hans Joachim Froben, was reassigned to combat duty in early 1945, but only award documents were issued. Therefore, was it possible for the "jeweler in Dresden" that he said was commissioned to produce the small quantity of badges to have geared up to produce the badges, go through the required steps leading to the production of the badges in the time of 44 days? From the information supplied by former Oberst Hans J. Froben, he seems to indicate that no badges were sent to recipients by the time of his reassignment to combat duty in early 1945, but only documents were issued. If his time schedule is correct, and we take January 1, 1945 as the date of his departure for combat duty, it gives a maximum of 44 days for the "jeweler in Dresden" to complete production of the badges. Could all this be accomplished in 44 days to have the badges ready to be shipped to the OKH for distribution to the troops?



    There is no dispute that the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge was instituted on July 8th, 1944. There is no dispute that awards of the badge were made during the weeks and months after the badge had been officially instituted. Known presentation documents (Urkunde?s) and entries in the service man?s identification and personal record books, "Soldbuchs", attest that the awards had been made. The major disputes arose over when the awards were made and did the recipient receive a badge as outlined in the criteria for awarding the badges. When was the badge designed, approved and awarded during WWII and what does the design look like? When were the recipients officially awarded their citation? Were all three classes of badges, as outlined in the statues, awarded and produced? Opinions and speculation can?t be allowed to influence the investigation, but only rational factual evidence is to be considered. I have been opinionated from the beginning due to my first hand knowledge gained over 30 years ago, but I will discount it first and not show anything except documented facts. I know that I will be accused of being bias, and truthfully and guess down deep I am. However, I will try my utmost to only show factual and documented evidence. I always say that facts and good hard evidence can?t be biased. I ask no more from anyone and if I accomplish my goal, everyone can understand the true factual story of one of the most controversial awards instituted and awarded by the German Army during WWII.

    As stated earlier, and as Exhibit No. 1 shows, Dr. Klietmann said that this badge was the original design approved by the Reich?s Orders Chancellery prior to the end of the war. Note the design of the eagle and how the head rises well above the neck and wings. However, the left wing is slightly wider than the right wing. (See Exhibits No. 1, close up of the eagle.) In Dodkins and Littlejohn?s book the design of the eagle?s head changes to appear that the eagle?s left wing is the same heights as the right and the beak appears to be looking at the "beard or hump" on the top of its left wing. (See Exhibits No. 3 and 3-A) John R. Angolia used the same photographs in his 1976, 1985 and 1987 revisions. (See Exhibits No. 2 and 2-A) Another change can be observed with Forman?s presentation in his 1988 2nd Edition book. The "beard or hump" is just beginning to develop and the eagle?s head appears to be looking at the flaw. Also, the left wing is beginning to look underdeveloped as compared to the right wing. In 1981, Dr. Kleitmann presents yet another photograph of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge that is the possible key to understand the "beards or humps" on some of the other badges. It appears that when the photograph of this badge was taken, the camera was held at an angle that allow the shadow of the badge to be captured giving an illusion of a "beard or hump" on the left wing of the eagle. Furthermore, this photograph is not the same photograph that he said was than taken of the original matrix. I did not see this photograph when visiting Dr. Klietmann in 1968, nor did he mention that it existed. Finally, when John Ormsby and I wrote the text for the Clay Publication Group series MEDALS & DECORATIONS OF HITLER?S GERMANY, 1981, we used a photograph of a Army Balloon Observer's Badge of the "bearded badge" used by Angolia. It was the only photograph of a badge we had and it was, after all, the badge we featured was thought to be original at this point in time. (See Exhibit No. 2 and 2-A.)

    Finally, to really understand the mystery of the different badge designs one must look at the 1988 1st edition of Adrians Forman?s book. FORMAN?S GUIDE TO THIRD REICH GERMAN AWARDS.AND THEIR VALUES. Here the first red flag was raised that would be a high water mark in the study of the various design differences used over a 33 year span of covering the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge. Forman used the original Klietmann photograph that in the beginning Klietmann said was the only known example of the badge to survive the war. If this was the case, why did Dr. Klietmann provide photographs of different badges and why did Forman suddenly change in his next two updates of his book to the later Klietmann supplied badge designs? It appears that Forman wasn?t aware of the photograph of the second badge that Dr. Klietmann displays first in a German publication in 1955 and again his book published in 1981. He probably didn?t have the photograph of the new badge until after Klietmann introduced it to the world in 1981. I am just speculating as to Forman?s reasons for changing photographs and I can?t use it in the final determination of the facts. It does, however, give us something to think about. Klietmann changed his original story of only one badge surviving the war to a small number of badges having been made. He knew about the second badge in 1968, but neglected to tell me. He as much told the collecting world, "Here a second badge is with its new design." All he accomplished was to throw more doubt on all the existing reproductions with the "beard or hump" on a deformed left wing. That new photograph was really the second red flag, but it was wrapped around the flagpole until we seriously began to look at the history of the badge. It was Mr. Otto Spronk who unfurled the flag and now we can see things that was camouflaged and right under out nose all along.

    As I said in the beginning, I would not introduce speculation, but would allow creditable circumstantial evidence to be entered as creditable evidence to this report. Since I am not a professional photographer, I consulted Mr. Otto Spronk, noted collector and researcher in the field of Third Reich history. He is also a professional photographer of many years? experience and his input into this investigation is that of a professional "expert" witness. I don?t think anyone in our hobby can impeach his credentials. Mr. Spronk and I have looked closely at the photograph of the second badge Dr. Klietmann introduced as an original period badge or designing original. I have no doubt that this second badge was exactly as Dr. Klietmann propertied the badge to be in 1981. If you will look closely at the photographs of this badge, especially the enlarged photograph, you will see a perfectly proportioned German National eagle. The wings are correctly designed with no "beard or hump" on the left wing. Most importantly, it does not have a deformed left wing. What is seen is that the photograph is of the original design matrix that was approved by Dr. Doehle sometime in late 1944 or early 1945. The photograph that Dr. Klietmann first said was the original designed matrix that was in the hands of the designer probably was the original design reject by Hitler. It was sent back to the designer, Ellmar Lang as proved in the letter to Lang from the OKW on July 26, 1944. (See Exhibit 5.) The second designing matrix would be the only original badge Dr. Klietmann ever seen and he was probably was right again and the man who had it was most likely Ellmar Lang, the designer whose original design was not approved by Hitler.

    Now we come to the beard, hump and deformed left wing that appears on all the other badges purported to be original issued badges. The next question is how did the deformity occur and why was it allowed to pass inspection by the inspectors of the Reich Order?s Chancellery?

    I again bring in the expert testimony of Mr. Otto Spronk. His explanation of how the deformity became part of the "bearded" badge was because of the way the photographer who made the photograph took the picture of the second badge. Klietmann said in his 1981 book that the example of the badge he featured was an example of an original badge. By featuring this badge, there is no doubt that he doubt he had photographs of two of the designing matrixes. The "beard" on the badges I have as examples of original period badges, and the copies later made from them, were caused by a mistake in creating the die. If you will look at the enlarged photograph the original Klietmann photograph, you can see that this photograph was made by angling the camera to the left of the badge thus producing a shadow under the beak. This shadow was incorporated into the die when the producer of the die thought the shadow was part of either the oak leaf wreath or the way the eagle was designed. Granted, this is a hypothesis, but no other logical explanation has been introduced that can show a different cause for the deformed die. Using logic again, no producer of Third Reich medals or badges would make such a gross error in designing a die even at this late date of the war. As the firm producing the badge had to submit a final product to the Orders Chancellery for approval prior to production, it is also not logical to assume that the Orders Chancellery officials would have accepted such a monstrosity. Therefore, the other evidence will more than substantiate these hypotheses and let it be accepted as creditable circumstantial evidence to be considered in the final analysis of that total sum of evidence.


    Unfortunately, I have not found any documented factual proof that the badge was produced. I have a lot of opinions and speculation, but I won?t use opinions and speculation and will not enter them into the report. I will allow the two distinctly different designed badges with the "beard or hump" deformed left wing be admitted into evidence on behalf of the proponents that these badges are original war time produced badges. The photographs will speak for the proponents of the badges. After all, one picture is worth a thousand words, or so the old saying goes. (See Exhibits 6 and 6-A and 7 and 7-A)


    What occurred in the months between the date of the institution of the Army Balloon Observer?s badge of July 8th, 1944, until the end of the war in May of 1945, is crucial in establishing if the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge was produced and awarded or not. The badge would have to go through the same process as any badge before production could be undertaken. Regulations first had to be written, instituted, and then distributed to all potential designers. Next, a design drawing, matrix proofs and samples were to be submitted to the Reich?s Orders Chancellery for approval. After these steps had been taken, the proofs were submitted to the particular branch of service to which the badges were made for to receive their stamp of approval. Once this was done, mass-production by a firm or firms was undertaken. The final step came with the distribution of the badges to the troops. All these steps were required for a badge to make the long process from the drawing board to the recipients? uniform.

    With the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge, some factual and documented information is available concerning the design and possible production. However, equally missing information must be found and pieced into the overall picture by using logical deductions to fill in the missing gaps. I will be the first to say that some of the actual facts may never be uncovered to produce a 100% factual report. We will have to rely in some cases on circumstantial evidence, a preponderance of such evidence, to fill in the missing parts of the story. However, in the end I am positive that a logical story will evolve.

    Here is a chronological list of the documented facts that dealing with the design and possible production of the badge.

    The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge was officially instituted by the High Command of the German Army (OKH) on July 8th, 1944. Awards in certificate form, entries in Soldbuchs, including some awards with an official presentation documents (Urkundes) were reported to have been made. Also, a veteran report of former Oberleutnant Alfred Uhde, said that he received the document in late 1944, but no badge.

    A case in point is the document awarded to Willibald Sellner, December 12, 1944. (See Exhibit No. 4. And 4-A) However, this is the only such documentation that I have seen and it is credited to Dr. K. G. Kleitmann. In the German text, by Nimmergut, "DEUTSCHE ORDEN UND EHRENZEICHEN BIS 1945, Volume 4, page 2329 - 2331, you can read additional information about this badge. A most interesting photograph of a blank Urkunde is featured on page 2230; top left of the page. If you will compare exhibit No. 4 and 4-A you will see that the documents are the same. They are the same except for the one Dr. Klietman presented in his 1981 book is filled out to Willibald Sellner. The swastika in the stamp has been obliterated in the Klietmann presentation. However, on the blank document, the stamp is placed in the exact and identical location on the document with no obliteration of the swastika. Finally, the signatures on both documents are signed EXACTLY the same way. Need I show more or say anything that any logical minded person needs to see to decide at this point concerning what we have with the two documents? They are one in the same with the name blocked out and the swastika obliterated to not violate German law regarding the display of the banned emblem of the Third Reich or a deliberate forgery.

    The badge was not ready in July to be presented to the troops. It has been verified, as of July 26th, 1944, that the Reich?s Orders Chancellery had not approved the badge design. The High Command of the Army had notified the designer of the badge, Ellmar Lang, Acchen, that the design he had submitted had been rejected by Adolf Hitler. He was given suggestions on how to improve the design to meet Hitler?s requirements. Two samples had been submitted by the designer, Ellmar Lang to Oberst Froben, and Froben department rejected one design and choose the other and ordered "twenty to forty of each grade" to be produced by "a jeweler in Dresden". He left his position as Director of Group III (Reconnaissance/Observation Branch of the several branches making up the artillery arm) in "early 1945" and no badges had been received at that time. (See Exhibit No. 5.)

    No additional documentation as of late December shows than an approved design had been sent to the designer, Ellmar Lang. Only the two documents dated December 12, 1944 indicates that the award, not the badge had been bestowed. However, the document to Willibald Sellner is in serious question as being an altered document. It must be seriously debated as to weather it can even be considered valid and creditable evidence. Another fact that is documented is when Dr. Heinrich Doehle, President of the Reich?s Orders Chancellery was ready to go to press with his 1945 edition of his book DIE AUSZEICHNUNGEN DES GROSSDEUTSCHEN REICH ? ORDEN, EHRENZEICHEN, ABZEICHEN. No approved design for the badge had been submitted at that time because he did not have a photograph or drawing of the badge in his manuscript. However, he lists all the criteria to be met for the awarding the badge.

    Probably the most important piece of evidence that I enter is based on the preponderate of circumstantial evidence and logical deduction. Dr. Klietmann wrote in his 1981 book, AUSZEICHNUNGEN DES DEUTSCHEN REICHES, 1936-1945, that a firm in Dresden produced the badge. He obtained that information from Oberst A.D. Hans Joachim Froben. English author Christopher Ailsby, in his 1994 book, WORLD WAR 2 GERMAN MEDALS AND POLITICAL AWARDS, also wrote that a firm in Dresden produced the badges. During a conversation about this badge, according to Chris, the firm was supposed to have been Glaser and Sohne, Dresden, Borngass 5, Germany. However, a major problem arises with this story because the entire city of Dresden was completely destroyed on February 13th, 1945 by British bombers. The entire city was reduced to rubble as a result of the aerial bombing, which lasted without letup until February 16th, 1945. The firm of Glaser and Sohne was completely destroyed and was not rebuilt until 1945. It did revert back to private ownership in the 1990?s and is still producing orders and decorations to day. If Glaser produced the badges as reported by Christopher Ailsby or for that matter, any firm located in Dresden, then they had from January 1st, 1945 until February 13th, 1945 in which to go through all the required steps necessary to have a badge ready for production. Therefore, using simple logic it will show that the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge never got to the production stage in the maximum of 44 days in which they had to accomplish the task if given January 1, 1945 as the date Oberst Froben left his position in the OKH.

    The hidden truths and the speculations that still tend to cloud what the exact approved design of this badge looked like may be erased by looking at the design of the 1957 reissue of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge. Logic dictates that the Bundesrepublic of Germany had to have had access to the Order?s Chancellery archives to obtain the design of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge to reissue it in 1957. Today?s researchers trying to obtain these records are faced with a major obstacle. Otto Spronk stated the following during one of our discussions about this problem. He said, "I think without some extensive archive-research it would not be possible to find the date of approval and maybe the design drawing from which a die would have been made. In the years after the fall of the Wall the Germans reorganized their archives. All Nazi-time related archives are now it Potsdam, near Berlin, and not in Koblenz anymore. The Military-archives are still in Freiburg, but all archives are still suffering from the moves and many of the old archivists who knew their stuff did not move to Potsdam. Now no one can find anything anymore. It will take some 30 to 50 years, maybe more, before they will have an easy access again." It appears that most of the work they are doing involves rearranging all the archives from both the former Democratic Republic of Germany and the Bundesrepublic.

    The lack of ability to obtain the original records of the approved design of the badge can be solved another way. If we take the designing matrix, the second Klietmann badge, and look at the design features found in it and look at the same features in the 1957 reissued badge, we can get a very clear picture of what the original design looked like. By simply looking at the design of the badge from a point below the national eagle and with the incorporated swastika, a much clearer picture is revealed. Therefore, look at the four pictures below and make note of the similarities of the badges.

    No. 1. The first picture is of a badge that is in the Bob Hritz collection.

    No. 2. This is a picture is of the badge in the R. F. Honts collection.

    No. 3. The third picture is of a 1957 re-issued badge.

    No. 4. This badge turned up in Russia this year and is the first of its kind I have encountered.

    The oak leaf wreath is basically the same design on all four Badges.

    The Gondola and support cables are basically of the same design.

    The number and location of the acorns on the wreath are just alike. Also, please observe the third acorn on the outer area of the wreath on each side of the wreath. These are extending lightly outward from the wreath more so than on the 1957 badge.

    Look at the stabilizing fins of the balloon in all three pictures.

    The design is the same.


    Observe the differences between the two badges pictured below.

    Look at the height of the wings, the heads of the eagles, the width of the wings and the "hump or beard" that in or is not on the badge on the top. It is of the designing matrix, exhibit No. 3. Please observe the contour of the top of the eagle?s wings and note which one has the most detail. Finally, observe the wreaths and determine if the wreath on the left differs from the badge on the bottom. That badge is the type found in the Christpoher Ailsby and Bob Hritz collections.

    A major hidden truth for over 55 years can be found in Dr. Heinrich Doehle?s, 1945 edition of DIE AUSZEICHNUNGEN DES GROSSDEUTSCHEN REICH ? ORDEN, EHRENZEICHEN, AZEICHEN. No approved design for the badge had been made at that time because he does not have a picture or drawing of the badge in his book. One must ask why didn?t he incorporate a photograph of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge in his coverage of this badge? The answer is simple. He didn?t have one because the designer, Ellmar Lang had not produced an acceptable design as last as January 1945. However, he lists all the criteria to be met for the awarding the badge. This is probably the most important fact hidden for over 55 years until Klaus Patzwall published Doehle?s 1945 book in 2000. The collector?s world must understand that up until Patzwall published Dr. Doehle?s book, it was a book filled with important information unknown for over half a century. This hidden information made it possible for the fairy tales stories that were told years ago in the 60?s to be accepted as fact and the reproductions of the badges to be produced. Thanks to Otto Spronk?s keen observation for pointing these truths out to me as they are the needle in the haystack used to puncture a hole in the last balloon of the Army Balloon Observer Unit. That balloon had been filled with hot air and launched by the fakers of fairyland over 40 years ago. The collecting community had no documented information to refute the false information until the information now found in Doehle?s now published book. Add the information supplied by Oberest A. D. Hans Joachim Froben and a clear picture will remove all doubt that has surrounded this badge for over 50 years. The information in Froben?s book, AUFKLAERENDE ARTILLERIE (Reconnaissance Artillery), published in 1972 by Schild Verlag, Munich, and the detailed information published in its entirety in the German Soldiers Yearbook in the 1980?s, is invaluable in understanding this once complicated story.


    I end this report with a feeling that I have presented much more factual information, condensed into this one report, than has been written before on this subject. Only the reader will be the final judge as to the creditability of my report. I know some will want to cling to the premise that their badge is like the master of illusions said it was in 1976 when he wrote, "The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge ranks among the rarest of war-time decorations." I would agree if I owned either one of the badges Dr. Klietmann presented to the collecting world. However I don?t know if either of the two are in any collection anywhere today. Were they designing matrix photographs from the archives of the Reich?s Orders Chancellery? Was the second badge an issued badge? Did they survive the war? These are questions left unanswered in this report, but the haunting questions for those collectors owning examples of this badge should be, "Is mine real? Is that badge with the "bearded" eagle and a left wing, that looks like it was injured by flying shrapnel during the bombing of Dresden, a badge produced during WWII? I know some are asking themselves "Do I own a 40 year old illusion of what might have been?" For me, I have my opinions; speculations and my mind made up. I will keep them to myself and leave the questions anyone may he about this badge for them to answer. I only hope that the answer will be based on the factual preponderance of the evidence as presented in this report.


    Klietmann photograph of the designing matrix from 1968. Personal files of Author.

    2.-2A. The Clay Group, Volume 1, Number 1. R. Clay Teppenpaw,

    Publisher, page 48, John Ormsby and W. C. "Bill" Stump Authors.

    (NOTE: photographs of the badge depicted was used by Dodkins and

    Littlejohn for their book Orders, Decorations, Medals and Badgers of the

    Third Reich and John R. Angolia for his three editions of For Fuhrer and


    1. Auszeichnungen Des Deutschen Reichs, 1936-1945. Dr. Kurt G.


    3. Klietmann, Berlin, 1981, page 122, photograph of his second reported example


    5. of an original badge.



    Auszeichnungen Des Deutschen Reichs, 1936-1945. Dr. Kurt G.

    Klietmann, Berlin, 1981, photograph of the presentation urkunde award to

    WILLIBALD SELLNER, 3/LE BEOB. (MOT) 2 for the 1. Class badge.

    4.A Deutsche Orden und Ehrenzeichen Bis 1945. Volume 4, Page 2330,

    photograph of unissued urkunde for the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge.

    5. Letter from Oberkommando des Heeres to Ellmar Lang, dated

    July 26th, 1944. Compliment of the Otto Spronk Photographic

    Reference files Collection.

    6. Type one of The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge, Obverse

    photograph. RH Honts Collection.

    6.A Type one Reverse photograph of the RH Honts Badge.

    7. Type two of The Army Balloon Observer?s Badge. Bob Hritz


    7.A Type two reverse photograph of the Bob Hritz Badge.

    Type three of the Army Balloon Observer?s Badge from Russia.

    Photograph credit Borgir, Russia.

    8.A Type three reverse photograph of the badge from Russia.

    Photograph credit Borgir, Russia.


    (Ballonbeobachterabzeichen des Heeres)

    A Comprehensive Study

    Copyright 2002


    W. C. Stump

    Edited by PKeating
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.