Steve K. Posted January 16, 2006 Posted January 16, 2006 Here are my pilot badges in aluminum: Assmann, Juncker & IMMEI have yet to see another IMME like this one. The wreath, eagle, hinge, and catch are unique. To date only a handful of collectors have seen this badge. Enjoy!!
J Temple-West Posted January 17, 2006 Posted January 17, 2006 Very nice, Steve. Of course my eye goes straight to the 'JMME'. Any chance of some close-up pix? It would be much appreciated.
Jan Arne S Posted January 17, 2006 Posted January 17, 2006 Hi Steve !WOW ! Nice LW Pilotbadges in Aluminium .Think it is the first time I ever seen a LW Pilotbadge maker JMME in ALu. Jan Arne
Steve K. Posted January 17, 2006 Author Posted January 17, 2006 I will post close-ups of the IMME tonight.
Steve K. Posted January 18, 2006 Author Posted January 18, 2006 I'm not sure what pix/angle you'd like to see. If you need more, just ask.
J Temple-West Posted January 18, 2006 Posted January 18, 2006 Thanks, once again, for the pix, Steve. What I'd give to have this piece in my hands for a couple of days!Well, what to make of it! First Impression... I think we have a very important find. In short, I would say that you have IMME/JMME's attempt at a (pre-Juncker) 1st pattern PB. It compares well with the 2nd pattern birds that were produced in conjunction with Juncker's early 2nd pattern wreath. Looking at a side by side comparison of the two badges, I can see why IMME then started using Junker parts...not particularly pretty!Just a few early thoughts?. I'll be doing some serious study on this badge and will post some comparisons of the badges in due course. Steve, if at all possible, could you let me have some dimensions? height and width of wreath, width of eagle (wig tip to wing tip).In the meantime, I?d be very interested to hear what the other members think. I bet Kurt will be interested in this one, seeing that he has one of the 2nd pattern examples!
Steve K. Posted January 18, 2006 Author Posted January 18, 2006 Well, all I can say is, everyone had their chance to hold it at least for a few minutes (and to even purchase it!). A large number of my pilot badges were at the MAX. Only one collector asked to examine it. I've had it for years now, and one young collector (years ago) told me it was a very good reproduction, and I said "A reproduction of what?" Show me another! To date, this is the only IMME I've seen with this bird and wreath, only one in aluminum, and there are no reproduction of this badge floating around (yet!). Naturally people are hesitant and call it an ugly bird when they first see it, but after looking at it next to other first pattern birds, it has many of the same characteristics and fits nicely into the IMME evolution. The second pattern IMME has already been reproduced, and I've only seen one real second pattern pilot badge I trust (on Brian's Website). There was one other on WAF from an Italian pilot's estate.Other people have called it an 'ugly goose' but beauty is in the eye of the beholder, no doubt! Too many people fawn over Juncker LW badges, when if you study details and crispness, Assmann wins hands down (I believe you feel the same way too!!) on all their badges. To each, their own! I find the IMME bird beautiful!
Steve K. Posted January 18, 2006 Author Posted January 18, 2006 The only characteristic that has given me pause is the monstrous hinge and catch, yet I have never seen another like it!!!
Richard Gordon Posted January 18, 2006 Posted January 18, 2006 SteveCould you provide some pics detailing the catch and hinge?ThanksRich
Steve K. Posted January 18, 2006 Author Posted January 18, 2006 (edited) J Temple-West and RichWreath height (long axis): 51.7mmWreath width (short axis): 41.4mmWing tip to Wing tip: 65.4mmSEM: approx. 1.3mm for each axis Edited January 19, 2006 by Steve K.
Steve K. Posted January 19, 2006 Author Posted January 19, 2006 (edited) Just to be clear, there is no doubt in my mind that this is an early pattern IMME Pilots badge. Eagle, wing fletchings, wreath...all unique (although the wreath closely resembles Junckers wreath). You could say 1st pattern (and I'm comfortable saying that), but ALL IMME types need to be known to state this confidently.My questions are:Was this a production series, a limited series, or a singular prototype?If a production series or a limited series, Where are the other IMME pilot badges like this one?IF its a prototype, why mark it with the IMME mark?Why use such oversized hardware for hinge and catch, which clearly deviates from other first pattern badges from other companies, whether made in aluminum or buntmetal? Or is the hardware a repair (which seems unlikely by the looks)? Edited January 19, 2006 by Steve K.
Guest Brian von Etzel Posted January 19, 2006 Posted January 19, 2006 It's my personal unsubstantiated opinion that early aluminum badges like this were very fragile and tended to break quickly and were discarded when newer badges like the Juncker tombaks were plentiful. Simple for me to say, impossible to prove, but the existence of repaired and unrepaired aluminum badges I think help make my case. As for the discarding, why not? Can't be worn, too fragile, broken...
Steve K. Posted January 20, 2006 Author Posted January 20, 2006 Brian,I think you are right. The aluminum badges would be breaking more often, and either being repaired or, more likely, replaced with stronger metal varieties.But why hasn't another one of these "First" Pattern IMME badges surfaced? I guess given the fact that there has only been 2 or 3 legit IMME second pattern pilot badges shown throughout the 'electronic' community (those able and capable of Internet access), it would make sense that there would be fewer "First" pattern badges around. Still, it would be nice to see another!
ERIC Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 WOW! That's a tough one indeed! The eagle is truly like that on Brians' 2nd pattern example and the one from that Italian Bomber Pilots' estate. I really don't know what to think to be quite honest. I like the overall appearance of this badge, I really do. Again, like those before me, the hinge is a bit of a head scratcher. On all the 1st pattern alu badges by other manufacturers, their alu hinges were pretty much the same style / size/ shape as their buntmetall counterparts. A comparison can't be made here because of the lack of a 1st Pattern JMME anything. I really can't poo poo personally because there is really nothing to compare it to. The quality of it really looks to be top notch. Having an open mind here, I say it could be possible that this is a 'missing link' in JMMEs badge evolution. I would love to see another like it.ERIC
Steve K. Posted January 21, 2006 Author Posted January 21, 2006 EricI can agree with all of your statements. My photos do not due this badge justice.....if you were to have it in hand, I imagine it would take you about 10 seconds to realize that the badge is authentic. The odd JMME eye that's seen typically on their RO/AG is seen here....another indication that it's part of the same family.The large hing and clasp may be an attempt to strengthen the aluminum badges, as they certainly may have seen Assmann and Juncker hinges and clasps breaking too often. A larger hing and clasp gives more surface area for attachment, and thus a stronger product. This is just conjecture on my part.Is there ANY other IMME/JMME LW qualification badges in ALUMINUM?
Steve K. Posted January 21, 2006 Author Posted January 21, 2006 (edited) Wing detail Edited January 21, 2006 by Steve K.
ERIC Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 Is there ANY other IMME/JMME LW qualification badges in ALUMINUM?I don't recall ever seeing ANY Luft Badges by JMME/IMME in aluminum before Steve. ERIC
Reini Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I must agree with everyone else that this looks good. The eagle is very similar to that on my IMME 'variant' , just slightly cruder. It surely looks like this was the first attempt and the eagle was refined to look like the pic I've attached. There is some debate about my badge , but there is little doubt when one is holding it in hand. A full set of the IMME series is going to be difficult!Nice badge! I'm jealous!BestKurt
J Temple-West Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I don't recall ever seeing ANY Luft Badges by JMME/IMME in aluminum before Steve. ERICThat goes for me too..The more I see of this badge, the more I like it.
Steve K. Posted January 21, 2006 Author Posted January 21, 2006 (edited) Eric and J Temple-WestExactly! I too have never seen another LW qualification badge by IMME/JMME in aluminum. So....We have a pilot badge in a form never seen before (by experienced LW collectors) using a material that was rarely used, and certainly not used by this company for other LW qualification badges (as we know to date), using odd hardware that fits no other maker, AND in near mint condition for such a fragile material! This would send up one HUGE red flag for me!!! Either fake.......(which would be the conclusion that most people would make) or you would be holding one of the most elusive (read: RARE) LW pilot badges known in the collecting world!!So...your challenge is to take all your experience...everything you know about details, construction, quality, etc., apply it here (or more aptly, apply those skills while holding the badge), and make your judgement on a karyotype of badge you have never seen before. I believe only the skilled collector will see that this badge is authentic and fits into the realm of 'war or pre-war production'. Edited January 21, 2006 by Steve K.
Steve K. Posted January 21, 2006 Author Posted January 21, 2006 (edited) KurtWhile I have not seen your badge completely, if it is original, like the one on Brian's website, then it is no 'variant', it's just an extremely rare badge. You wrote >>>>>> ......just slightly cruder.......>>>>>>>I will have to disagree with you here. I believe my badge is actually a better strike and more 'classic' features of a pre-war bird (i.e. pronounced curvature of the neck, more detailed feathers, highly detailed claws and legs....etc.).You wrote >>>>>> ....Nice badge! I'm jealous! >>>>>>>Thanks. I think its a nice badge too. But don't be jealous.....given the arguments that I illustrate, I'm leaning more towards the fact that this was a limited series and may not have seen much circulation.Kindest Regards,Steve Edited January 21, 2006 by Steve K.
Reini Posted January 21, 2006 Posted January 21, 2006 I was referring mainly to the face and talons on the eagle , as well as the wings which I realize now you may not have seen. This badge is in another thread , but I'll post more pics here now. I certainly did not mean to detract from your badge in any way , but I suspect you know that.First is the eagle's left wing.BestKurt
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now