Jump to content
JapanX

“Vein” approach to dating Rising Sun Orders: a DaNgErOuS pAtH

Recommended Posts

Dangerous and misleading mystery – this is the motto of our new thread :lol:

I hope that courteous readers remember about this easiest way to dating rising suns.

Actually the easiest way to date a 7th or 8th class Rising Sun is by using the length of the 3rd curling vein in the leaf counting out from the bottom. I have observed a few hundred pieces over the years, including a good few examples in groups or with documents where I am comfortable that they were an original pairing, and the basic rule is that the longer the vein, the older the striking.

On this piece the 3rd vein ends just at the indentation of the leaf, which would lead me to suggest that it is from the Taisho era (Siberian expedition or thereabouts). Russo Japanese War pieces have a longer vein that protrudes below the level of the indentation while China Incident era pieces are shorter and end above it.

What is interesting is that the later post war pieces again have a longer vein but they have no enamel on the reverse of the 7th class and have a different "feel" to the depth of the overall stamping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.

For many years this rule circulates among our fellow collectors.

But does this rule really works?

Let’s test it!

But before that allow me to help you out with this tricky approach ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Rule

The rule is simple. It states that all you need for exact dating of rising suns in two lower classes (some collectors applied this rule to all classes) is 3rd curling vein in the leaf counting out from the bottom. Here you can see this spot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. After finding this sacrament vein all you need to do is to see where it ends (in relation to leaf indentation).

They say there could be three scenarios.

Edited by JapanX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taisho vein

Edited by JapanX

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s all folks! You won’t need litmus paper to perform this test – that’s for sure!

Ok. Now it’s time for some performance testing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing the rule for 8th class orders

Please take a look at the following two photo galleries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking good?!

Really?!

I am not sure about that.

Hmmm.

Allow me to help you with applying our vein rule.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn’t look well!

The oldest order in this group our rule identified as Taisho/Showa piece.

Big mistake!!!

To say nothing about obvious inability of this rule to discriminate between Taisho and Showa pieces.

But maybe thing will be different in case of 7th class orders?

Let’s go for it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing the rule for 7th class orders

Another set of photo galleries – this time for 7th class orders.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I think comment is superfluous.

But what’s up with these upper classes and our rule?

From bad to worse.

Allow me to demonstrate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing the rule for 3rd class orders

And another set of galleries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same depressing picture you’ll get for 6-4 classes.

By the way, it will be interesting to note striking similarity (by enamel color, manufacturing style, etc…) between later after-war specimens. Please take a look at this compilation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Blog Comments

    • Thanks for your reply Patrick, just in case some might not know what the Belgian WW1 Medal you were referencing looks like I have included one here. I understand that the small crown on the ribbon denoted the recipient was a volunteer.  
    • Brian, Thanks for initiating this discussion. For me, it’s a combination of the thrill of the chase, the history behind the item, and the aesthetics, although this latter factor may seem a bit strange to some. To illustrate this, the very first thing I collected as a kid in the 1950’s was a Belgian WW1 medal, for service in 1914-18, which is bell shaped, with a very striking profile of a very dignified soldier, wearing an Adrian helmet which bears a laurel wreath. It was the image that
    • Thank you for sharing your story, it was most interesting and greatly appreciated, it makes this blog well worth the time to post. Regards Brian  
    • Hello I started collecting when I found my first Mauser cartridges in a field next to my parents' house next to Armentières. I was eight years old.  Then shrapnel, schrapnell balls, darts... That's how I became a historian. When I was 18, we used to walk through the fields with a metal detector to find our happiness. It was my time in the army as a research-writer in a research centre that made me love the orders of chivalry. I've been collecting them for 24 years now. Christophe
    • Thank you for your most interesting comment. The thrill of the chase didn't interest me in the beginning but over time it started to overshadow the act of simply adding yet another medal or group to the collection. Regards Brian  
×
×
  • Create New...