Chris Boonzaier Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 I just found award document to landsturmmann kr?ger of the 17. R.J?g.Batln.I was under the impression that there were no "Ersatz" "Landwehr" od "Landsturm" J?gers? Just regular J?ger or reserve-J?ger....Can anyone give any help in this direction?ThanksChris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 The unit was RESERVE. The private's personal status was "Landsturmmann" based on his age. He could have been called "J?ger," "Reservist," "Ersatz-Reservist," or "Landwehrmann" all based on his age and previous military service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Boonzaier Posted May 10, 2006 Author Share Posted May 10, 2006 It is however the first J?gr award doc I have seen where the man has been something other than J?ger ot Reservist.Bestchris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 Glenn can no doubt give a more scientific answer, because depending on when in the war, Kr?ger could either have been middle aged or an underaged teenager and borne this "Private" designation. What it means, I think, is that he was a replacement from a general infantry-trained recruit pool, randomly assigned to this J?ger unit. I've got photos of men wearing 3 button cuff line infantry tunics with J?ger shakos who must have been the same sort of replacements.Making scans-- back in a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 Some 5. Reserve J?ger Bataillon friends of Carl Willy Wild. He had been a recruit in Hessian Infanterie Regiment 116 in December 1915, when his rank was "Musketier." Unfortunately his later photos from this unit (so stamped in one that was mailed) do not show if he continued to be called that, or if he was transformed into a "J?ger." What the photos DO show is numerous M1910 INFANTRY tunics being worn with "5" J?ger straps, and mixed person in J?ger and infantry tunics, all wearing J?ger Feldm?tzen and shakos.[attachmentid=38706] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 The young Walt Disney lookalike has no number on his shako. These bear dates in a January without any year-- 1916?[attachmentid=38707] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 And this sniper in a "spider hole" wearing feety pajamas... oops, waterproof (hopefully) leggings, and using what appears to be a shaving mirror (probably didn't NEED it) as a personal trench periscope surrogate:[attachmentid=38708]J?ger headgear, infantry tunics all.So what were they called, for ranks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Murphy Posted May 12, 2006 Share Posted May 12, 2006 (edited) A private by any other name is still a private. If a private was in an infantry regiment, he was a Musketier. If he transferred to a jager battalion, he would be referred to as a Jager. If he was then transferred to an artillery unit he would be a Kannonier. This applies as long as he is actually transferred to the unit. The rank of Musketier would be crossed through on his soldbuch and militar pass and the new rank of Jager would be written in. If he is a Musketier temporarily attached to a jager battalion that has suffered heavy casualties (for instance), his official rank would still be Musketier. In that case he would still wear infantry uniform, headgear and fieldgear. During the war, there was a shortage of uniforms. A man transferred to another type of unit would not necessarily receive a new uniform or shoulder straps since they might not be available to be issued. When the units supply system received a new shipment of uniforms and shoulderstraps, they would then be issued out to those in need. This may take a few weeks or a few months. Even then, if the man had a serviceable uniform (no matter what kind) he would probably not recieve a new one, just straps. The supply officer or NCO did not care care what kind of uniform it was as long as it was serviceable. If the supply NCO wanted to issue him one, but he wore an extra small or extra large uniform, he was probably still out of luck. Most of the uniforms received would be in medium sizes. The next thought is... If the man was issued a uniform just because he transferred to that unit, what would the unit do with the other uniform? Now they have a uniform that they cannot issue, the only choice would be to return it back up the line for reissue to another unit. The unit has now gone from having a uniform in the field and having a uniform in supply, to just having a uniform in the field. When you look at it like this, it just does not make sense to issue that new uniform when faced with severe shortages during wartime.Dan Murphy Edited May 12, 2006 by Daniel Murphy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Boonzaier Posted May 12, 2006 Author Share Posted May 12, 2006 A private by any other name is still a private. If a private was in an infantry regiment, he was a Musketier. Not only Musketier....From a randon array of Regular and Reserve infantry regt EK docs... All names for Privates. Musketier is not any or less comman than infanterist or Landsturmmann.Landsturmmann, Reservist, Grenadier, F?silier, Wehrmann, Ersatz-reservist, Infantrist, Musketier, Landsturmmann-Rekrut, Sch?tze, Landwehrmann, Soldat (Kriegsfreiwilliger, Soldat, Kriegsfreiwilliger, bestchris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joerookery Posted May 16, 2006 Share Posted May 16, 2006 because depending on when in the war, Kr?ger could either have been middle aged or an underaged teenager and borne this "Private" designation. Rick is spot on. It was more systematic in the Landwehr.. Looking at the start of the war. The active-duty soldiers were those who had turned 20 in 1912 and 1913, which were born in 1892 and 1893. The reservists, where the next five classes: 1891, 1890, 1889, 1888, and 1887. There were more reservists than there were positions in the active regiment. Left over reservists formed or filled out other units. Active Units : 54% active duty soldiers46% Reserve soldiers.Reserve Units: 1% active duty soldiers44% Reserve soldiers.55% Landwehr soldiers from the 1st BanLandwehr Units: 62% Landwehr soldiers from the 1st Ban 38% Landwehr soldiers from the 2nd Ban What I do not understand is what does 5th J?ger have to do with JR116? Yet there he is with a marked shako! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted May 16, 2006 Share Posted May 16, 2006 Yup, a little clump went right from late 1915 recruit training in pre-war blue tunics, big Hessian crown belt buckles... to the front in INFANTRY tunics, which they then wore with J?GER headgear and shoulder straps. The rest of the group photos aren't good enough-- field groups, posed in the barnyard with M. and Mme. and les petites enfants and so on. Who in 2006 would believe an M1910 infantry tunic with J?ger straps? Not me-- if I didn't have the photographic proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joerookery Posted May 16, 2006 Share Posted May 16, 2006 Ahhhhh but then we have this! A Hessian Shako!?!?!?!?! No shoulder straps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Boonzaier Posted January 13, 2007 Author Share Posted January 13, 2007 What date would the avove photo be from? I would have thought most J?ger troops would have had the G98... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Boonzaier Posted February 13, 2009 Author Share Posted February 13, 2009 Hi,\anyone have an approx date for the pic above?ThanksChris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naxos Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 Prussian J?ger with M1910 Infanterie Rock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joerookery Posted February 13, 2009 Share Posted February 13, 2009 anyone have an approx date for the pic above?Chris I would imagine it is 1914. This guy is not a J?ger but rather a Landsturm soldier. There was no such thing as a Hessian shako during WW1. This is an old-style shako that had been worn in Hesse quite a while ago which was required to be maintained. This had to be taken out of storage and used early in the war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now