Alex K Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 I have the attached example of the order of the red eagle 4th class, been in my collection for a good number of years. I have noticed that other forum members have posted many examples of imperial bars with this medal included. All the bars I have seen so far show this medal with what I would call "pebbled arms". My example posted shows smooth arms.There are no obvious makers marks except for the underside of the lower arm, which seems to show some form of stamp/marking, ( apologies the gubby fingers) which to me are undefinable.Any assitance in identifying this piece would be greatfully recievedregardsAlexthanksAlex K
Stogieman Posted May 4, 2007 Posted May 4, 2007 I would agree. It matched the period of the cross. It does appear to have been mis-struck though.
Alex K Posted May 4, 2007 Author Posted May 4, 2007 Hi guys, thanks any idea as it's period?regardsalex
Alex K Posted May 5, 2007 Author Posted May 5, 2007 Thanks nearly as old as the wife then! on a serious note, any explanation as to when they went from smooth arms to pebbled, or was it an individual manufacturer's preference?regardsAlex
saschaw Posted May 5, 2007 Posted May 5, 2007 As I know, the date of the change is not known for sure, and estimations are from 1879 to 1892. 1892 is the latest possible time for smooth arms, as then came the crown, and pieces with crown and smooth arms do not exist. I do not know where the 1879 date comes from, but as I know, some doubt it ... A very nice one, by the way.
Alex K Posted May 5, 2007 Author Posted May 5, 2007 thank you gentlemen, so the change happened to all RAO's at that time and was not a manufacturer's personal preferenceregardsAlex
Schießplatzmeister Posted May 7, 2007 Posted May 7, 2007 Hello Alex K:What you have is an 1846-1854!!!!! example with the "Lila Adler" (lilac eagle). This is much less commonly encountered than the later type of the smooth-armed cross with the "Karminrotem/Ziegelrotem" (brick red) eagle. A very fine piece!Best regards,"SPM"
Alex K Posted May 8, 2007 Author Posted May 8, 2007 HI SPM so its older than previosuly thought , thanks for the comments most helpfulRegardsAlex
Veteran Posted May 8, 2007 Posted May 8, 2007 Hello everyoneCould this cross also be considered to have the first type eagle?. It shows no marking on the arms. What period could it possibly be?Thank you for your commentsBest regards to all on this fine forumVeteran
Schießplatzmeister Posted May 8, 2007 Posted May 8, 2007 (edited) Hello Veteran:Your photo is of the same-era (1846-1854) badge as that posted above. A very nice piece congratulations!It should be noted that this is actually the 2nd type of eagle as far as 4th Class RAO badges are concerned as the first type had a silver center and was made in one piece.Best regards,"SPM"Hello everyoneCould this cross also be considered to have the first type eagle?. It shows no marking on the arms. What period could it possibly be?Thank you for your commentsBest regards to all on this fine forumVeteran Edited May 8, 2007 by Schie?platzmeister
Veteran Posted May 9, 2007 Posted May 9, 2007 Thank you very much. This is the first and only one I have ever seen, and I really neaded expert advice.Very best regardsVeteran
Wild Card Posted May 9, 2007 Posted May 9, 2007 Gentlemen,For comparison - a first type Red Eagle 4th class. Just so that there is no confusion, this style (no porcelain center medallion) was never used in the first, second or third classes.Regards,Wild Card
Alex K Posted May 10, 2007 Author Posted May 10, 2007 Hi Wild Card, thanks for the info, nice medal, obviously an early pieceregardsAlex
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now