Ed_Haynes Posted March 31, 2006 Share Posted March 31, 2006 (edited) We have individual threads for most of the awards but not, it seems, tor the two most common, the Honorary Medal of Compat and the Honorary Medal of Labor. Why not start them?What Jan and I show, subject to revision and correction, is:A 38.1/M 21.1 - Type 1.1 (Screwback, Uigur, numbered ?No.?); Low = 214/High = 985; 1941-??A 38.1/M 21.1 - Type 1.2 (Screwback, Uigur, SN without prefix, seperately soldered ring); Low = 1569/High = 11953; 1946-56M 21.1 - Type 1.3 (Screwback, Uigur, SN with "No" prefix above the SN); Low = 10663/High = 10668; 19??-??M 21.1 - Type 1.4 (Screwback, Uigur, SN without prefix, ring part of the medal); Low = 12001/High = 16525; 1961-63A 38.2/M 21.2 - Type 2.1.1 (Screwback, Cyrillic, impressed number); Low = 16785/High = 21521; 1966-??M 21.2 - Type 2 1.2 (Screwback, Cyrillic, engraved number); Low = ??/High = ??; 19??-??A 38.3/M 21.2 - Type 2.2.1 (Pinback, ribbon); Low = 23854/High = 35869; 19??-??A 38.4/M 21.2 - Type 2.2.2 (Pinback, enameled ribbon, silver); Low = 737/High = 4892; 19??-??A 38.5/M 21.2 - Type 2.2.3 (Pinback, enameled ribbon, silvered bronze); Low = ??/High = 23750; 19??-??A 38.6/M 21.2 - Type 2.2.4 (Pinback, enameled ribbon, silvered bronze, unnumbered?); 19??-?? Edited March 31, 2006 by Ed_Haynes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerd Becker Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Here is a Type 38.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 The "blank" reverse on that one has a ghost image of the letters from the center obverse as if this was stamped twice-- and turned over![attachmentid=32682]It will be interesting to see if this was a "Bad Monday" production batch at this serial number range or one that is literally unique! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerd Becker Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 (edited) The "blank" reverse on that one has a ghost image of the letters from the center obverse as if this was stamped twice-- and turned over!It will be interesting to see if this was a "Bad Monday" production batch at this serial number range or one that is literally unique!Yes, there are indeed ghost letter. I don?t know, if this in an uncommon thing, but all the one, i have checked, don?t have it.Gerd Edited April 1, 2006 by Gerd Becker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 1.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 1.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 2.1.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 2.2.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dolf Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 The "blank" reverse on that one has a ghost image of the letters from the center obverse as if this was stamped twice-- and turned over!It will be interesting to see if this was a "Bad Monday" production batch at this serial number range or one that is literally unique!Oh... I recognise that one... I'm happy it found a new loving home Dolf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 2.2.2They get real ugly here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 Type 2.2.3Is this numbering "official" or "unofficial"?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 1, 2006 Author Share Posted April 1, 2006 (edited) The "blank" reverse on that one has a ghost image of the letters from the center obverse as if this was stamped twice-- and turned over![attachmentid=32682]It will be interesting to see if this was a "Bad Monday" production batch at this serial number range or one that is literally unique!Maybe that's why they added that ugly patterned reverse to Type 2.2.3 and Type 2.2.4?? Edited April 1, 2006 by Ed_Haynes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerd Becker Posted April 1, 2006 Share Posted April 1, 2006 Maybe that's why they added that ugly patterned reverse to Type 2.2.3 and Type 2.2.4?? Ed, i think, thats not too far fetched.Dolf, yes, its my first and i love it, especially the thick green enamel, but when i see the early ones, its definately not my last one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlennC Posted April 2, 2006 Share Posted April 2, 2006 (edited) My high number Type 2.1.1 Edited April 2, 2006 by GlennC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Nice set here - two labor's awarded to the same person - useful also for getting some dates for our researchers:)Notice the Uighur one - person applied some solder to fix a broken suspension - gives it more character Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 Here another pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 And last one - with the details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 16, 2006 Author Share Posted April 16, 2006 Ohhh, nice, Bob! Close-up on the resolute revolutionary visage of the recipient, please??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Ohhh, nice, Bob! Close-up on the resolute revolutionary visage of the recipient, please???Voila Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vatjan Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 (edited) Maybe those who read cyrillic could provise a little name translation for all these marvelous documents Edited April 17, 2006 by vatjan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 A nice little set but, on the surface, nothing really exciting . . . .Type 1.1.2, #10328It is cased, but I do not show it here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 Documented . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 . . . and a close-up of the cheerful lass who received it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 The award details, 30 August 1956. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted August 3, 2006 Author Share Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) And now for the surprise . . . .Wadded up in the bottom of the box -- and totally overlooked by the seller and, therefore, not seen in detail by me until this very moment -- were additional documents. Edited August 3, 2006 by Ed_Haynes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now