Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ed_Haynes

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      14,343
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      25

    Everything posted by Ed_Haynes

    1. King Hussein and his successor (and son) King Ali ibn Hussein (r. 1924-25) created other decorations, not directly relevant here: --- Wisam al-Istiqial / Order of Independence (1921) --- Ma?an Medal, 1920 --- Medal of Arab Independence When King Hussein stepped down as King of the Hejaz in 1924, it was in part to assume the title of Caliph which he had claimed after it had been abolished by Mustafa Kemal Attaturk in Turkey and in part to assume wider rulership of a pan-Arab kingdom which he had been promised by the British for his support during the war. He also stepped down under military pressure from a rising new power in the Arabian peninsula, the King of Najd Abdul Aziz ibn Abdul Rahman ibn Faysal ibn Turki Abdullah ibn Muhammad Al Sa`ud. In 1932, Abdul Aziz would unite the Arabian peninsula into the new kingdom of Saudi Arabia. And that is quite another tale. In March (?) 1921, the Arab Revolt/Najdi flag was altered to show horizontal black / white / green stripes and, presumably, this apperared also on the badges of the Wisam an-Nahada.
    2. The earliest badges were worn not from ribbons but from a twisted cord of black, white, red, and green. As this, obviously, did not conform to the phaleristic conventions of the British "friends" of King Hussein, a ribbon was introduced: equal stripes of black, green and white; with a narrow red stripe in the centre of the green stripe. This would be used until 1952.
    3. Note, please, the flag. It is important and diagnostic for the period and variety of the order we are dealing with. The earliest badges have, for the horizontal stripes: Black / green / white. Vexiology is important for phaleristics. I do not have an image of the first badge, but this is "close", though the flag is wrong.
    4. The orders was created in 1917 as an award for specific services in the Arab Uprising under Grand Sherif Hussain ibn Ali in the Hijaz. The order was a single-class (?) order with, as the obverse, an elaborate six-pointed silver star with green enamel. Between each point is a green-enameled wreath with a small yellow bud. In the center, two crossed flags of the Arab Rebellion (not Jordanian) in color on gold enamel with a star above and the Arabic inscription in black ?His [God?s] Servant Al-Hussain ibn Ali?. Around, a red-enameled band with an Arabic inscription ?Order of Al Nahda? with athe date ?1334? (A.H. = 1917 C.E.). The badge is suspended by an enameled ?Arab Revolt? flag and a small gold crown. A digression on flags is demanded . . . . The flag of the "Arab Revolt" was (apparently) designed by Sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office, though Sherif Hussein modified the shade of red. The green is said to represent the Prophet?s banner, the white the Amawi tribe, the black the Abassi, and the red the Hashimi.
    5. The exteremely complex (and interesting) Hejai/Jordanian order, the Wisam an-Nahada / Order of the Renaissance has been raised on another thread http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=11855 and I thought it needed more focused attention. It must be placed within the history of the era in which it was created. The Wisam an-Nahada / Order of the Renaissance was created in 1917 by Hussein ibn Ali al-Hashimi, who, since 10 June 1916, had named himself King of the Hejaz (the western coastal region of the Arabian peninsula). He had, since 1908, served under the Ottoman rulers of the peninsula as Grand Sherif of Mecca, but had been seduced away from that loyalty by the overly famous T. E. Lawrence "of Arabia" into a watime rebellion against Turkish rule of the Arab lands. Sherif/King Hussein:
    6. No information, unfortunately. Some great service, though!
    7. To "bump" this, to respond to a query raised in another thread, and to get it back on track: An Iraqi medal group. I think you guys can identify the medals from the specimens already shown here?
    8. Looks like a nice website, thanks OoV. I have the Rosetta Stone set for Russian and TRY, but find finite brain cells for language these days.
    9. Contemporary: Mongolian Red Cross: http://www.redcross.mn/ Their awards: http://www.redcross.mn/english/awards.html
    10. I have posted my Soviet KIA over on the other thread (well, a link to the place where it is presented in greater detail). Personally, I get confused by parallel threads and cross/double postings. But, then, I confuse easily.
    11. The 30 March 1945 POW list for Europe (only) has been reprinted in three volumes as Prisoners of War vol 1 British Army (ISBN 0-903754-61-4), vol. 2 Naval and Air Forces (ISBN 0-903754-62-2), and vol. 3 Armies and other Land Forces of the British Empire (ISBN 0-903754-63-0, the only one I have as it includes the Indian Army). These were reprinted in 1990 by J. B. Hayward and are now fairly hard to find. I got mine through Chris Dixon, but I know their stocks were low at the time. You might be able to turn up copies through http://www.abebooks.com/ I looked and found at least one copy of vol. 1 (at $125). In some ways, the March 1945 list may not be the most useful, as many POWs (in Italy, for example) were let loose by then. Earlier lists are in the various archives. I have used a 1943 and 1944 list (I think) at the National Army Museum's library. About all this list will give is the camp in which he was interned and the POW number (which, I'd wager, relates to some other records, whether German, Italian, or British). I'd be surprised if much could be found online. As I tell my students (constantly) "research" is to "Google" as apples are to stones.
    12. Much wise widsom here. Thanks, all. One more suggestion: If there is ANY way to do so, a beginning collector should develop some degree of ability in the Russian language. Even if it is only a rudimentary knowledge of the printed Cyrillic script (handwriting is quite another matter and is a bigger challenge!) with a limited vocabulary and almost no grammar, I think some level of Russian is a vitally important part of the fledgling Russian phalerist's toolbox. Ideally, higher levels of skill in Russian should be sought. Not only are there documents and citations to read and translate, but I suspect that, twenty years from now if it is not true already, the most important sources will be in Russian. There is already the Mondovor online site and a number of very good focused books on awards like the Red Banner and Lenin. I suspect that, as we move beyond the classic and ground-breaking (I almost said "revolutionary") Red Bible, you'll need literacy in Russian to benefit much. This will reflect what we are seeing already, the emergence of a large and active ethnically and linguisitically Russian collecting community. Just as one needs German to be a serious collector of German awards in any era, Russian is very desirable for the collector of Soviet awards and, in a few years, it may be a near-necessity. For those of us here, now, the first generation of post-Cold-War students of Soviet awards, many of us stumble along with limited or no Russian skills. Some, like me, can barely function (I and I need to take my own advice here). I can't imagine the second generation being able to do so. And how much easier would it be for us if we could read (forget conversation, which reduces the value of most CD-ROM based language teaching tools, as they focus on speaking and comprehension skills). Learn Cyrillic, get a dictionary, learn the rudiments of grammar, and get to work! I know I am!!
    13. Smells fake/fantasy, but let me check the books to see if it is a "mule". Looks to me like Taiwanese eBay dreck. Sorry.
    14. A nice boxed pair that lives with me. See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=3778
    15. Evdokiia Nikifornova Kalinina See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2734
    16. Maria Yakovlevna Oprishko See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2732
    17. Alexey Karpovich Seergeev See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2733
    18. I just realised some of my single items (researched and unresearched, documents and undoumented) weren't shown (or cross-linked) here. Shall strive to remedy that. First Sergeant A. V. Grebenschchikova See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2329
    19. Well reminded: 1- OMSA is the place to be - hope to see all there next year. Getting the intuitive "gut" feel from groping nice things . . . oh . . . 2- This forum is great, as there is much expertise here and much eye candy too.
    20. And the two varieties of the medal of labor: 1- Medal of Labor, 1948-65 variety, "RPR" / Medalia Muncii, 1948-65 variety, "RPR" 2- Medal of Labor, 1965-89 variety, "RSR" / Medalia Muncii, 1965-89 variety, "RSR"
    21. Yes, they are lovely. The two varieties: 1- Order of Labor, 3rd class, 1948-65 variety, "RPR" / Ordinul Muncii, 3rd class, 1948-65 variety, "RPR" 2- Order of Labor, 3rd class, 1965-89 variety, "RSR" / Odinul Muncii, 3rd class, 1965-89 variety, "RSR" 3rd class only, so far . . .
    22. Identifications and information transfer by PM? After having asked publically for an ID? We surely have become very secretive all of a sudden.
    23. Correct, Gerd. By "high end" I don't mean one of the high generals-only orders or even a Lenin (though those ARE sexy) . . . I mean a good Glory 2-3 pair or a screw-post Red Banner or (yes) a Nevsky -- something that isn't likely long service and will repay research. I cannot imagine having something serial numbered and unresearched! Frankly, I prefer groups over types, as you come closer to a person's life that way. But you see THAT in my collection.
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.