Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    Hallo

    As many o you know,the Lee-Enfield and German Mauser 98 wir tha main battle rifles o ww1,these rifles wir used by a variety o countries such as germany,england,australia,new zelland. and they were bolt action high powered rifles,but Which o them in yer opinion wis the best?

    William Tuna

    Posted

    I love the bolt on the Enfield, I also find it has a nicer, more solid feel in the hand.

    But I think you will seldom find a German who preferes the Enfield over the Maiser or a Brit that prefers the Mauser over an Enfield (I am talking about shooters, not guys who love Mausers because they collect German stuff).

    Posted

    For the most part the Mauser is a nicely made piece of technology but I think it would need a lot more care in the field than the Enfield. For hunting I would take the Mauser over the Enfield but for the use they were intended I would rather have the Enfield.

    Then again perhaps as Chris has stated it could be a matter of nationality in my choice.

    Cheers :cheers:

    Brian

    Posted (edited)

    Chris,Brain,thanks a haip for the replies

    where can i purchase a lee enfield rifle here in tha uk? :unsure: dae i need to hold a fire arm certificate?

    William tuna

    Edited by gumbirsingpun
    Posted

    While it has been often accepted that the Short Magazine Lee Enfield is inferior to the Mauser System, particularly as regards the strength of the action and accuracy, it is most likely one of the most "soldier proof" rifles ever designed. It was also preferred for it's reliability under the most adverse conditions, as well as it's speed of operation. In 1912, trials conducted at Hythe against the German Service rifle, it was found that about 14 - 15 rounds a minute could be fired from the Mauser, compared with 28 for the SMLE.

    • 1 month later...
    Posted

    I have four Enfields ( two no. 1s, a no. 4, and a jungle carbine) and five Mausers in my collection, and have fired hundreds of rounds through them.

    In my opinion, the Mauser's strengths are its accuracy, smooth action, and light weight. With the Enfield, i would say it has the edge when it comes to ruggedness. Kind of like the M16/M4/AR-15 vs. the Kalashnikov, I suppose.

    I would feel comfortable having either, if I were a soldier in WWII.

    Posted

    Was the Lebel as good as the Enfield or German rifle, it never seems to be mentioned.

    I did have a lovely 1916 dated Enfield (old spec deac) with 1915 dated sling but sold it to a mate a while back.

    Tony

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.