JapanX Posted June 14, 2012 Posted June 14, 2012 (edited) Unfortunatly even during these ancient times there were pieces with much more quality enamel and details... Obverse Edited June 14, 2012 by JapanX
JapanX Posted June 14, 2012 Posted June 14, 2012 Now try to imagine quality of modern times fakes They are made in original materials and by punching... Cheers, Nick
oleg Posted June 14, 2012 Posted June 14, 2012 Unfortunatly even during these ancient times their was pieces with much more quality enamel and details... Obverse Looks perfect.
JapanX Posted June 14, 2012 Posted June 14, 2012 (edited) With price sometimes as high as 40 G's (saw this one only once in 2008 ) it really should be :lol: Edited June 14, 2012 by JapanX
Mogul Posted June 15, 2012 Author Posted June 15, 2012 Unfortunatly even during these ancient times there were pieces with much more quality enamel and details... Obverse I've seen one of these for 5 bucks on eBay.
JapanX Posted June 15, 2012 Posted June 15, 2012 I've seen one of these for 5 bucks on eBay. Unbelieveble bargain... From "grab on sight" series ... Such quality piece usually could cost you up to 500$ and even more... That is if it`s selling as copy :lol:
Mogul Posted June 15, 2012 Author Posted June 15, 2012 Unbelieveble bargain... From "grab on sight" series ... Such quality piece usually could cost you up to 500$ and even more... That is if it`s selling as copy They actually sell these things as a copy. Most of the times.
Chuck In Oregon Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 Very interesting thread. I knew a collector in Baku who had a VERY large outstanding offer for an authentic example for years, subject to authentication by the state museum. He never had a taker. Chuck
GHB Posted October 24, 2014 Posted October 24, 2014 I have been surfing old threads and this was interesting to say the least. While it has taken us 9 pages to get here let me summarize so you can go back and scan (when this shows up a as a recent post): (!) It appears in conclusion that a badge awarded in 1932 based on a design first made./approved in 1932 should not bear a hallmark that expired in 1927. (2) A badge that fails to include all elements of that design can be at best described as an owners copy or collectors copy but for the flaw noted in (1) above. Based on the two conclusions above it would appear that the badge in question was intended to fool those of us in the collector market. GHB.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now