Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    • 10 months later...
    Posted

    Another horrible Zimbler fake is currently being auctioned on eBay, with the seller describing it thus: "You are bidding on a beautifully preserved field pilot badge from 1913." 

    Buyer beware!

    2121102273_FakeZimblerbadge1.thumb.jpg.3a061af93e6a1da69ffb89c505921f60.jpg

    42226224_FakeZimblerbadge2.thumb.jpg.f46c15140334bcb4ea72698b9f6ba598.jpg

    890976502_FakeZimblerBadge3.thumb.jpg.f122417e7100150e9dfc1f66c06390ea.jpg

    492394197_FakeZimblerBadge4.thumb.jpg.ef131aac290314603aa94f374bab61e2.jpg

    • 4 months later...
    Posted
    On 02/06/2015 at 16:30, tifes said:

    Dear Kasle,

    Firstly I would like to touch upon the last point about cracks in enamels.  Well, obviously I was thinking about the cracks that are visible by naked eye. I do not use anything stronger than 6x magnifying glass of standard numismatics loupe.  I have never had a need to go for something stronger. If there is something invisible and not disturbing then it is OK. In wasting majority of all cases there is basically no problem to distinguish between genuine (pre-1918) enamel and modern polymer epoxide. The difference is day and night and even good quality photo is sometimes more than enough to clearly recognise the original and modern copy. Of course, there are some good quality copies made in 1990s and more attention should be paid indeed.   

    Concerning the source of information I would very much prefer some quality literature than non-verified internet sources. In my humble opinion two best publications in this particular area are written by prominent Austrian expert Mr. Jörg C. Steiner. First one concerns field pilot badges (Jörg C. Steiner;  Das Feldpilotenabzeichen – Militärhistorische Themenereihe, Band 4, Wien 1992) and second one observers badges (Jörg C. Steiner;  Das Luftfahrer-Abzeichen  – Militärhistorische Themenereihe, Band 8, Wien 1993). Both are written in German and they contain massive amount of all kind of information which Mr. Steiner gathered during his extensive research on the topic.

    Back to awarded badges. I can only repeat what I know. There is Circular Note No. 170 dated to 2. October 1917, part 13, Nr. 44252 which is published in 47th part of Official Journal of the k.u.k. Army dated to 6. October 1917 and signed by k.u.k. Minister of War GdI Rudolf v. Stöger-Steiner.  It contains, except the exact design of “new” pilot badge, also the paragraph which says the following (courtesy translation from German) : “Attachment of the badge is made by the safety hooks, instead of until now used standardized needle, which is placed under the monogram shield, respectively shield with coat of arms”.

    I do not know about any other amendments to this circular note in this respect. The reason for that was quite simple and purely practical.  Needle broke away quite often, because badge on the uniform was placed on quite exposed spot. There was a concept that one needle should have been replaced by double needle but this wasn’t very practical and even quite expensive. Safety hooks prevailed as this was a wish of the pilots and even some field pilot badges FJI version 1913 had been modified by hooks by the pilots themselves when needle tore away. All badges had been commissioned by the company “Zimbler”. First badges had been delivered not sooner than January 1918 and till end of the WWI 320 badges of this type should have been awarded to field pilots. There is quite possible that last 42 pilots never received theirs badges, because there was some time gap between decision made and decision carried out and meanwhile the Empire ceased to exist. Probably these pilots purchased those badges by themselves as they had been fully entitled to.

    Of course, maybe I am missing something and somebody dispose of more precise information on this subject. I would be really glad to get anything new to complete or even change what I have written above.   

    Your badge, despite the pictures are in rather small size, seems OK for me. I would say it´s WWI original, because of the overall execution. It is quite possible that it was made by Zimbler. Needle would be OK when put on the dress uniform.  Zimbler made almost all of its products of non-precious metals. I have seen some badges made by Rothe or other (civil) jewellers, of the highest craftsmanship, mostly in silver and sometimes with dedications in beautiful leather boxes. Sometimes they have identical shape as the official badges, but sometimes they  look different. All of them are rare and quite expansive on the phaleristics marker now. Your badge is good addition to the collection and many collectors have the same or similar badges.     

    Regards,

    tifes                  

     

    20200707_230216.jpg

    20200707_230124.jpg

    Hallo.I would like to ask local experts if this badge is original or a copy?Thanks.

    received_316534322835940.jpeg

    received_966171803811852.jpeg

    Posted
    26 minutes ago, marcel7151 said:

     

    20200707_230216.jpg

    20200707_230124.jpg

    Hallo.I would like to ask local experts if this badge is original or a copy?Thanks.

    received_316534322835940.jpeg

    received_966171803811852.jpeg

     

    20200707_230335.jpg

    20200707_230353.jpg

    I would like to know the opinion of the original or a copy?

    Posted

    Thank you for the comment.I compared my badge with the Hungarian copies you mentioned and they differ in more detail and are also not very elaborate there.Do you think my badge is a copy?I would like to know the opinion of local collectors, thank you.

    Posted

    Good evening everyone,

    to marcel7151: I would say that´s production of Mr. Horváth from Hungary, early 1990s. I am sorry but it´s just a copy.  

    tifes

     

     

    Posted

    Thank you very much for the comments and examples to compare another pilot badge in the etui.Thank you for reviewing this badge as well.

    received_903922503446090.jpeg

    20200710_152810.jpg

    received_956588614786386.jpeg

    received_320293662342442.jpeg

    received_2544473429147227.jpeg

    20200710_152825.jpg

    received_201843324528681.jpeg

    Posted

    A friend lived for 20 years in the belief that he had an original badge, so he asks about this second badge in the case, is it also a copy or original?Thank you all for your opinions.

    Posted

    Hi Marcel,

    can you send a better close-up pictures of second pilot badge? One thing is sure. It´s not official awarded badge but it might be privately purchased one in period before 1918. Enamels of the wreath look good to me but wreath as such is having bit strange form.Officially awarded badges for field-pilots of the 1st type (FJI) were on needle. There is also true that this needle used to break off very often and pilots themselves replaced it by two hooks and this system was later officially adopted by badges of 2nd type (Karl). However these hooks (Karabinerhafteln) were placed on this badge by maker and it´s not some kind of "do-it-yourself" job. Box is not original. It´s some kind of privately purchased case, which was "adjusted" for the badge.    

    Tifes

    • 10 months later...
    Posted

    Hello,

     

    a detailed, well-taken picture of the marks struck to the reverse, would be most interesting.

     

    The pin is not consistent to those mounted on originals, besides not being perfectly vertical as it should be.

    The naval pilot's badge is a true minefield.

     

    Besides being lucky enough to find one of the very few originals, it's better to find one of the very fine copies made by Rothe in the 60s-70s, instead of risking a lot of money for a deep delusion...

     

    all the best,

     

    Enzo (E.L.)

    Posted

    Enzo,

    Thanks. The marks from left to right are an 'AZ' a 'greyhound head' and the letter 'A'.

     

    I do not own this item, so this is the best I can do with the picture I have, sorry for the blurriness.

     

    AH2eee.jpg.bb0288beb9746342000f3e2c0c10ecc0.jpg

    Posted (edited)

    The marks, although quite blurry, appear as correct maker's and silver marks. the maker's one looks like -as said- "AZ", the "Windhundpunze" and the "A" mark for Vienna.

     

    If the marks have been faked, this time the forgerer did a good job...

    Edited by Elmar Lang
    Posted
    On 28/05/2021 at 10:07, graham said:

    Enzo, yes it is up for auction.

     

     

    5800 EUR hammer price means 7100 EUR in total (with fees). Now congratulation to the new owner would normally follow but to avoid a sarcasm I would rather skip it...

    • 4 weeks later...
    Posted (edited)

     

    Any thoughts on this piece?  It comes in a fitted case that first accepted a pin, then widened at the top and bottom to accommodate clips.   If it passes muster, can anyone take a stab at the "F" word before the date?  I can't be sure if it's a pilot's name or a place name.  Thanks.

     

    GutLand1.jpg

    Gut Land2.jpg

    Gut Land3.jpg

    Gut Land4.jpg

    Edited by Luftmensch
    Posted

    It looks like good, privately purchased piece with dedication to me, certainly not awarded, but fine one. On the reverse "Gut Land" (wish for a pilot for his save return) but I can´t decipher "F" word before 1916. Sorry, maybe somebody else...

    Posted
    1 hour ago, tifes said:

    It looks like good, privately purchased piece with dedication to me, certainly not awarded, but fine one. On the reverse "Gut Land" (wish for a pilot for his save return) but I can´t decipher "F" word before 1916. Sorry, maybe somebody else...

    I read "Feneteör" which makes not really sense. I could not find a similar name or place.

     

    Regards

     

    Christian

    Posted

    Thanks for the tumbs up.  I am going to try and find a list os serving pilots in the Luftfahrtruppe and see if there is anything close in the "F"s, though the name could be a family or friend not in the air service...

    • 3 weeks later...
    • 2 years later...

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.