Chris Boonzaier Posted March 2, 2016 Posted March 2, 2016 I was happy to add a third one to the set... Top one is a WW1 period Eichhorn, then a WW1 period WKC smaller bayonet and then the combat knife... Strangely enough the top one does not fit on a rifle.... The oil hole (or whatever its called, is missing on the top one, and is just cosmetic in the grips of the smaller one...
piekenier Posted March 2, 2016 Posted March 2, 2016 That horn grip combat knife is really neat nice and complete with its scabbard and leather clip .All looks original .Is the metal aluminium?
Chris Boonzaier Posted March 2, 2016 Author Posted March 2, 2016 Hi, It is steel. Here they are with the regular KS98s
Trajan Posted July 12, 2016 Posted July 12, 2016 Many of the 'dress' Seitengewehr did not fit onto rifles - some don't have mortice slots, or mortice slots that are too short or narrow, or non-functioning press-studs and catch systems. What sort is the top example of yours? If it has a mortice slot, does it have a piece of coloured felt in it? The second is a very nice example of the short KS made as a 'dress' weapon. There is an excellent example of one of these with an applied (metal) monogram of Wilhem II on the grip illustrated in Nolle and Carter, Deutsche Seitengewehre und Bajonette, no. 221 on p.93, and I know of others - a friend in the UK has one. I have seen a photograph of one of the Central European minor princes or somebody like that who is wearing one of these - but can't remember where right now! Trajan
Daron Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Hi there - I'm new to this site and would appreciate any help identifying this item - I think it is a KS98 sawback maybe private purchase ? I can send more pics if required - thanks in advance.
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 2, 2016 Author Posted December 2, 2016 Hi Daron, I think you have a winner. Can you show the stamps on it, in the side of the blade and on the back, between the saw and the hilt. Best Chris
Daron Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Will do - where are you located ? I'm inJHB Regards Daron Do you have Whattsap ? I can send pics that way It's also a numbers matching scabbard and blade - crown W07
Daron Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Apologies Chris - I thought I was talking to Piekenier - my fault - I will take some close ups of the markings and send them through Regards Daron Here's one - I'll send more
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 2, 2016 Author Posted December 2, 2016 Fantastic, You have a really nice gem there!! I would buy it in a second if I saw it at a show. best Chris
piekenier Posted December 5, 2016 Posted December 5, 2016 Daron it is a 1907 KS 98 mauser bayonet. There should stamped numbers on the crossgaurd and scabbard throat.Please post photos of that side . Chris the KS98 is not an officers bayonet , but worn by other ranks and NCO's ,nor a private purchase .I do know that you know that .It is just the heading of the post that is a bit misleading . Thank you so much for sharing photos of your blades.
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 5, 2016 Author Posted December 5, 2016 31 minutes ago, piekenier said: Chris the KS98 is not an officers bayonet , but worn by other ranks and NCO's ,nor a private purchase .I do know that you know that .It is just the heading of the post that is a bit misleading . Hi, indeed you are right, I was intending to just show the ones bases on the issue bayonet that officers purchased when they replaces swords but it meandered into the issue ones as well, but that is ok, the more the merrier :-)
Daron Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 Hi there - here's the picture of the throat - the same number appears on the cross guard - can you tell me what it is if not an officers or private purchase ? Thanks again Regards Daron Also - what is the deal with the missing hole/slot in the grips that i see on the other KS98's ? Regards Daron
piekenier Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 Daron this KS98 was not a private purchase .The numbering indicates an issue number ,weapon number, of a regimentally issued weapon.The scabbard was never nickel but black and the nickle finish was obviously done later .The numbering is not the type seen on bayonets carried in the German colonies ,as they have alphabetic letter ahead of the number ( KS or DOA etc).I am puzzled by the numbering as even regimental numbers in Germany have a combination of letters and numbers in some form like 1.E.435 .
Daron Posted December 6, 2016 Posted December 6, 2016 Hi So a strange puzzle to be solved Thank you for your help Regards Daron
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 6, 2016 Author Posted December 6, 2016 Is there anything more on the crossguard? Like a KS?
Daron Posted December 7, 2016 Posted December 7, 2016 Hi Chris As far as I can see just the number 484 - however there might be something under the plating on the scabbard - I'm loath to peel it off but I'll take off a little bit to satisfy my curiosity - as Piekenier said - the plating is not original - so what harm could that do ? Regards Daron
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 7, 2016 Author Posted December 7, 2016 I am going to go out on a limb kere and say that no matter what the stamp is, it is very probably still Schutztruppe. My reasoning is, these bayonets are scarce. Schtztruppe bayonets used to be easy to find in South Africa. If a KS98 is found in South Africa it is way more likely to be from GSWA than from the European theater, and the numbering is also not one used by a Europe based Unit... So taking into account that the numbering is not really usual for GSWA OR Europe... but that the chances of finding one of these in South Africa to a colonial unit are waaay bigger than finding one to a Europe based unit... I think (without proof) that it is pretty likely to be GSWA with some kind of unusual numbering (Maybe early before they used the KS prefix?
Daron Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Hi Chris Very interesting ! and more confusing ! Any idea why the grips don't have the slot in them near the guard ? I've seen them on other ks's ? By the way I've just found an HJ knife and Luftwaffe 2nd pattern dirk - these are from my dad who recently passed away. Regards Daron
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 9, 2016 Author Posted December 9, 2016 Hi Daron, usually they have the slot, I cannot make it out on your photo if it is lacking? Best Chris
piekenier Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 All the one's I have seen so far have the slot in the grip plate !It is however a 1907 marked blade stamped ERFURT,and I agree that it is very likely a Schutztruppe piece from one of the African colonies ,probably German South West Africa .The guy that stamped the numbers just went home before he stamped the letters KS .Daron you have not posted a photo of the lettering on the crossgaurd?.
Jeff Noll Posted December 13, 2016 Posted December 13, 2016 (edited) All, The kSg98 was designated as a "Seitengewehr für Maschinengewehr Schützen". They were introduced in 1901 to coincide with the first five Machinengewehr-Abteilung (GMGA Nr.1 and MGA Nrs.1-4). They were intended for "prestige" units as they followed the pattern of the earlier Hirschfänger M71's distinctive eagle head pommel. The issue bayonets were produced by ERFURT, AMBERG, V.C.SCHILLING, C.G.HAENAL P.D.LÜNESCHLOSS and E&F HÖSTER. The last issue bayonets were made in 1915 (by ERFURT and E&F HÖSTER). Besides Maschinengewehr personnel, they were formally authorized for Colonial Troops, Airmen, Engineers, Communication, and Medical Personal. As noted earlier, private purchase versions of the kS98 and kSg98 were very popular with officers after 1916 when the wearing of swords was discontinued. These bayonets were made in many configurations and their variety seem to be limited only by the price the purchaser was willing to pay. They were also produced with black hilt fittings (black enamel or rust blueing) ostensibly for wear in the field. The most desirable of the lot was the model which actually had a carved eagle head hilt with red jeweled eyes, a cyphered grip and with an etched blade. WRT the nickeled issue bayonet posted by DARON. In my opinion one cannot deduce any Colonial Troop use without the presence of any Regimental Markings related to Colonial Troops. These would be K.S. (most prolific), P.T.K., P.T., S.K., Sch.K., or Sch.D.O.A.. Edited December 13, 2016 by Jeff Noll
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now