Jump to content

Veteran with Waterloo Medal from Hannover


BlackcowboyBS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gentlemen,

I have purchased this old photo for my upcoming book on the orders and medals of the kingdom of Hannover, it seems that the Gentleman shown here wears the hannoverian waterloo medal. I guess you can see it much better at the cutout, a silver medal with a head looking to the heraldic left side, a huge iron ring for the ribbon and the shroud does looks like iron too. The ribbon has a darker strip on the heraldic  left and probably on the right side too. So I guess it would fit in.

The interesting part - besides the medal - is that the photo was taken at a photographer, who had his business in New Jersey, Jersey City, 99 Montgomery Street. So our Gentleman here was probably an immegrant who made it to the US. His photo is back to Germany now, this is a nice proof of the circle of history. 

Gentlemen I'd like to hear your thoughts and comments on this.

 

Waterloo Hannover GMC.png

detail waterloo.png

PS: funny thing is, that the Photographer seems to be an immegrant from France, his name was Jh. A. Guiremand

Edited by BlackcowboyBS
PS added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Bonjour Cowboy,

Below my impression, as a photo collector, of the scans you're showing. It is a bit chancy to take conclusions without seeing the physical material piece, but here I'll take my chances.

Interesting to note, the cardboard backing of the CDV appears to be quite thick - as was typical of CDVs of a "later" era than when a Veteran would have been photographed (1880s-1890s).

Craton used in the 1860s was generally very thin.

It may be an optical effect of your scan - but this is corroborrated by the photographer - noted as active c.1881 in New Jersey :

http://gary.saretzky.com/photohistory/njphotographers.html

The sitter appearing to be in his 70s, there is something at first a bit puzzling, as the dates don't seem to add up.

However, it is also my impression that the photo is a period contretype of an earlier CDV (photo of a photo).

Basically a reproduction of an earlier photo, generally for family purposes.

Impression stemming from a certain blurry quality of the photo, but mostly the lower right corner, showing sign of the delimitation of the previous print :

Hannover.jpg.fd4241ea5486d755b152ba62da1cab83.jpg

Which would mean that the photo was reproduced in New Jersey c.1881.

It does not mean that the original was not photographed in the US - in fact we would never know.

The fact that this would be a second printing would actually be a good sign for the Medal to be indeed the Hannoverian Waterloo i.m.h.o.

Very nice find !

Bien cordialement,

Jérôme

 

Edited by Djedj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bonjour Jérôme,

mercie beaucoup for your information, quite intersting what you are writting. Yes the CDV was quiete thick, about 1 mm. Very intersing is your link, quite impressive what you can find in the internet nowadays. 

Yes a veteran of 1815 would be at least 81 / 82 years old in 1881, when the photographer opened his shop in Jersey City. So I guess your conclusion that this is a photo of a photo seems to be correct. I can live with this, as I am not collecting photos but just buying them to get photos for my upcoming book. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi a very nice picture but - please do not get me wrong - I have to ask: is it really a Waterloo medal? The head seems very large to me and the medal quite small in relation to the ring, when compared to Hannover Waterloo medals. May it not be possible that he is wearing a Wilhelmsmedaille? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 1 year later...

After much consideration I still and finally opt for a Wilhelmsmedaille, every aspect fits here, including the ribbon - but it is simply too small for a Hanoverian Waterloo medal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Blog Comments

    • As a theology student my professor, a much published former Naval chaplain, set us an essay, saying that if we could answer that successfully we would be guaranteed  a good degree "Which of the gospel writers was the biggest liar, discuss."   I got a good mark, but  don't want to be burned for heresy.   P
    • As my father used to say: "Tain't so much Pappy's a liar - he just remembers big."  
    • Brian: First, let me say that I always enjoy reading your blog and your "spot on" comments.  Another fine topic with such a broad expansion into so many different facets.  I had watched this a week or two ago and when reading your blog, it reminded me of this great quote.   There is a great video on the origins of "Who was Murphy in Murphy's Law"   Anyway, about mid way through this video, there is this great quote and I think it sums it up quite well to your statem
    • I've received word from the Curator that she has permission to re-open this summer.   We're already making plans for a November event at the Museum.   Michael
    • I recall I did the same on hot days at Old Fort York back in 1973-74 - wool uniforms, and at 90F they would let you take your backpack off.   Michael
×
×
  • Create New...