Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    Hi Gentlemen, 

    I would be very grateful to know your opinion on the following. 

    Currently there is an auction on ebay of a bar with a civil merit order 2 class which looks great. The only one thing which is bothering me is the coat of arms. 

    The order has a R mark for Roesner. All the orders made by this jeweller had a small cross on top. On this one it is missing. A3B08E12-D933-4758-B08D-322C29E64819.png.4d67c820bc291528580afa9717b66853.pngBelow I show few examples of the coat of arms from Roesner: 

    3197638B-2EA0-417D-9CA3-582B0661BB1F.png.d753f8645405f9723edb8e046dfa06c0.pngBE8437FC-2220-4520-82A9-AA7132B29BF6.png.9c4b55afe7a7bcadaf9ca24cb96845de.pngAll the examples which I found from maker R have the cross on top of coat of arms. 

    The other maker S does not have the cross on top and the coat of arms has slightly different design (will post below). 

     

    Does anyone has a Roesner example with a missing cross on coat of arms or the one from ebay just lost it ? 

     

    Thank you, 

    Lucky

    Here is the coat of arms from maker S: 

    A7ABEA2C-B9E7-40CB-A27E-4B0CAF4022DE.thumb.jpeg.59c7c8b591aa2767ad6df4f89681ee70.jpegThe main difference (which I spot) is the design of coat of arms and the different type of letters. 

     

     

    Posted (edited)

    Sorry, maybe I don't get you right, but are you talking about the missing globus cruciger on the crown abow the coat of arms? (see red circled on the photo)

    If so, then it looks like this upper part of the crown was just broken and so it is purely damaged and not another version. Or did I get you wrong, then I would like to understand what you are talking about.

    reichsapfel.jpg

    Edited by BlackcowboyBS
    Posted

    Yes exactly, sorry if it was not clear. I am speaking about the damaged top of the coat of arms. So it is indeed damaged and not a different version unfortunately . 

    Posted

    I've been a collector of Saxon bars for many years, and I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss this one. Firstly, I don't know what happened to the device on the Merit Order. Secondly, the precedence can vary regarding the Albert and Merit Orders, I have bars where one takes precedence, or the other. Thirdly, Scharffenberg DID use hooks for mounting decorations, I have a bar with the St. Henry Order which contradicts your statement. The use of this label can also be explained. I agree that the reverse hardware is not typical, but this is not sufficient for me to dismiss this one.

    Posted

    Vince is right.

     

    The order of saxon orders varies on bars. I have seen many examples of wrong orders of precedence.

     

    Look at the bars of GL Johann Pflugbeil and GM Johannes Hahn for example.

    Posted

    First: Well I know the Scharffenberg backside like this. Second: I guess I have seen medal bars with Albrecht first then merit order and both with swords, at least this is how I remember them. But if just one of them with swords then he must be worn first, thats for sure. 

     

    Scharffenberg.jpg

    Posted

    I am very sorry to put my 10 cents, but the order of the decorations is not enough to dismiss this bar. Below are some photos from this forum: F734082A-EE94-43E6-9998-5102F5E372A0.jpeg.fc22985c4cdb6aa3ed97a05182e63842.jpegCB36C7C4-B91A-4721-AC12-B7544E4B5BA7.jpeg.d44d01e6a16661bdfca05e418fb4e395.jpeg

     

    Posted

    Here are a couple of bars, as you can see the top one has the Merit Crosses of the Albert and Merit Orders, with the precedence inverted. The second has the expected order. The third is a Scharffenberg creation which uses the tailor hooks. Sorry about the orientation of the images, not sure why that happened.

    saxonbars1.jpg

    saxonbars2.jpg

    Posted (edited)

    Hi Vince, they are all great bars, thats for sure. But none of these bars conflicts with the post from Triadoro. All of your bars are post WW1 and what Triadoro claimed is, that Scharffenberg would never have mixed the order of precendence when building a medal bar before end of WW1. Your bar shown in the middle is not from Scharffenberg so no discrepancy at all. 

     

    So we can recap: Scharffenberg medal bar made before End of WW1 should have St Henry - Merit Order - Albrecht Order, medal bars post WW1 could be mixed up, maybe even from Scharffenberg, but that point still needs approval! 

     

    PS: looking at the medal bar shown by Simius Rex it is also a post WW1 medal bar, but maybe not done by Scharffenberg himself but by another jewler who just used the old backside of the original one usings the middle of the old blanket? just my 2ct

    Edited by BlackcowboyBS

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.