Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ed_Haynes

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      14,343
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      25

    Everything posted by Ed_Haynes

    1. Many thanks. Evocative, historical, and personal. You have reminded us of the truth that lies behind the paper, metal, and cloth that we study. I, too, wish you could have spoken at length with your grandfather. I feel the same about mine. When memories go, they go, and all we have are the documents, whether on paper or in phaleristic form. You have done him a true service.
    2. Somehow, I doubt Himmler would have cared, or known enough English to care, . . . He was too busy chasing his clinically lunatic schemes, such as Hitler being the maahdi or a bodhisattva of Maitreya (I have seen both in the RF-SS documents). No wonder they lost!
    3. Oops, sorry: Frank SYKES, GC No. & Rank at the Time of Action: Collier Unit/Occupation: Bentley Colliery, Doncaster, Yorkshire Date and Place of Birth: 3rd April 1905, Dewsbury Date and Place of GC Action: 20th November 1931, Bentley Colliery, Doncaster, Yorkshire The London Gazette: 30th September 1932 -- http://www.gazettes-online.co.uk/archiveVi...&selHonourType= Whitehall, September 14, 1932. His Majesty The KING has been graciously pleased to award the Edward Medal in Silver to Ernest Allport, Edgar Hamilton Frazer, Samuel Jarrett Temper ley and John Ward, and the Edward Medal to Richard Edward Darker, Oliver Soulsby, Frank Sykes and Phillip William Yates in recognition of their gallantry in the following circumstances: ? At 5.45 in the afternoon of the 20th November last a violent explosion of firedamp, followed by fires, occurred in the North East District of the Bentley Colliery, Yorkshire. Of some 47 persons working at or near the coal face, 45 were either killed or died later. A large number of persons rendered heroic assistance in the work of rescue; and after careful investigation the eight persons named appear to have displayed special gallantry. Ward, pony driver, who was near an adjacent part of the coal face, was blown off his feet and enveloped in a thick cloud of dust, but as soon as he recovered himself went on his own initiative towards the face, guiding himself by rails and tubs, and assisted an injured man towards a place of safety. He repeatedly returned towards the face and helped to extricate injured men and bring them away; and he continued at rescue work for three hours, until completely exhausted. His bravery in groping his way towards danger, immediately after being knocked down by the blast,, was outstanding. Darker, Soulsby, Sykes and Yates also displayed great gallantry and perseverance in extricating the injured and conveying them to a place of safety.. It will be appreciated that the atmosphere was hot and vitiated and that there was evident risk of further explosions. One such explosion actually occurred at 10.30 p.m. injuring members of a rescue party, as mentioned below, and a third explosion occurred later. . Allport, Temperley and Frazer were prominently concerned with rescues from the area of the fires, which was explored somewhat later and in which the danger was extreme. Temperley, an assistant surveyor at the colliery, volunteered to lead a rescue brigade to the return airway, where some men were still alive, by way of the face, there being a fire on the direct route. On the journey an explosion occurred severely burning three members of the party. The party then returned, but Temperley, though not equipped with breathing apparatus, went on, with one of the Mines Inspectors, as far as the entrance to the airway and subsequently helped to carry out an injured man past one of the fires and rendered other help. Allport, a member of the colliery Rescue Team, took a prominent part in the rescue operations, displaying energy, initiative and bravery, and encouraging other rescue men. He was over three hours in breathing apparatus and during part of the night, when his rescue apparatus required replenishing, he assisted in loading men on to stretchers. Subsequently, in answer to a call for volunteers after the. second explosion, he seized a breathing apparatus, and joined a rescue party which penetrated past a fire to rescue two other men. Frazer, who is H.M. Divisional Inspector of Mines, explored much pf the most dangerous area, displaying great gallantry in venturing among flames, smoke and afterdamp though not provided with a breathing apparatus; on hearing moaning in the return airway he ran back to summon a rescue party, but returned to the airway without waiting for them. He subsequently remained in the most dangerous area assisting to organise rescue operations and helped to take out past a fire two men rescued from the airway; and although exhausted he continued his efforts, until all the men, dead or alive, who were reported to be in the district had been extricated. As The Boss has indicated, an E.M. exchange, but ,still . . . !!! See: http://www.gc-database.co.uk/recipients/SykesF.htm
    4. May people do things for reasons that made complete sense at the time. And it is sometimes difficult for us to critique them and their actions decades along. For the INA (those I know best), such a step made sense. And some French, Dutch, and Finns (among others) joined the Nazis after all. I struggle for find much coherent sense for the (non-Irish, non-Scots) British (other than to escape from POW camp). (If we can ignore the fact that many -- even today -- endorse and support the Third Reich and its agenda!) We need to know much more than we do about these Britsh "volunteers", all 30-or-so of them, we need work by serious historians. It may be too late to do so?
    5. OK, in a probably-all-too-easy effort at not burning out the limited brains of all "players" (as Chuck maybe came close to doing): What (single) British (and Commonwelath) woman received the Order of the Red Banner of Labor (Labour?) during the Great Patriotic War? OK, a simple (?) online London Gazette search may solve it, but please by-pass that frustrating way to answer this. Should no one get it, there is an extra-credit question: What "politically incorrect" (for the time) gallantry awards had her father and husband received? And why? Should take HOW MANY seconds . . . ??? Too easy, OK.
    6. Nice groups, all. Thanks. So much history here. Keep on postin' . . . .
    7. The first should be easy enough to get from the NA (nee PRO), the second may be more complex, but I think these Korea-era records opened recently. Sometimes kinky for awards to foreigners, but usually they are there if one has the willingness to do The Hard Work That is Research. Not headed that way anytime soon, or I would offer to look.
    8. Great. Is this the full group? Having missed out on two (Indian, of course) GC groups in recent years, I am envious. As Lord Ashcan has all the VCs, this may be the best we can do.
    9. Despite how much we may joke about it, Wikipedia is (sometimes) not a bad place to look.
    10. A fascinating unit. We may, however, safely assume that close on to 100% of the "collectible" items on the market related to that unit will only serve to increase the fertility of your garden? (But, then, everyone wants to assume that THEIR piece, which has a STORY, is the ONE real one . . . sure . . . .)
    11. The only word is: RESEARCH But you've heard that before! Happy for you! Why have these things if we can't don't research them?? And, if not now the knowledge will come eventually; if not us, then the next custodian (though 'tis nice to see the history restored to these "things" on "our watch"!).
    12. Maybe of interest, maybe not, but the latest issue of the American Historical Review has an interesting article dealing with the experiences of German (and Austro-Hungarian) POWs in Russia: Alon Rachamimov, "The Disruptive Comforts of Drag: (Trans)Gender Performances among Prisoners of War in Russia, 1914?1920," American Historical Review 111, 2 (April 2006): 362-82 See: http://www.historycooperative.org/journals...rachamimov.html (or try your local library).
    13. The only ones I have are in the Dvornikova group, discussed over at http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=7234
    14. I just wish I could determine that it was legitimate! All research has come up empty. Is that good or bad??
    15. Oh . . . . . . and just when you thought you were free of this "group"! A type 3? See: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=2456
    16. Yeah, since you'll never know that they match up -- absent solid provenance, and then you'll only have a strong belief -- I too tend to view the unnumbered medal as a specimen and the corresponding certificate as a ("a" not "the") document to the corresponding medal. To turn that around, you can prove (by document) that Comrade "A" was awarded the "B"; what you can never know (not even, to be honest, with the most solid provenance) is whether the "B" that you have with it is his "B". It is so much easier with named and numbered medals. Provenance (and old original mounting) increases the odds, but never to 100%. Documented unnumbered medals that come paired-up from the friendly dealers should never, I think, be seem as anything other than a "marriage", as a sum of their parts.
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.