Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted (edited)

    Photograph of a RB #8

    Gentlemen,

    GMIC-member "lentiay" (Maxim) from Russia shows a photograph from a book of an RB #8 in presentation box at that thread:

    http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?s=&showtop...st&p=136258

    You can read under the photographed RB #8 in that book, that all RBs #8 are unnumbered - without s/n. -, due to the fact, that they had been never claimed.

    So there are unnumbered RBs #8 at stock somewhere :unsure: ? As far, as I know, Soviet Orders had been numbered just after production :unsure: ?

    Best regards :beer:

    Christian

    Edited by Christian Zulus
    • 1 year later...
    • Replies 85
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted

    Guys,

    A couple of nice pics that may shed a bit of light on the topic at hand: group of General Burcev (currently held at the Central Armed Forces Museum)

    Marc

    Posted

    Dear Marc,

    many thanks for the scans :cheers: .

    RB#7 seems to be authentic to me ... :unsure:

    I can hardly dedect the s/n. of RB#7 - could you tell it to us.

    Best regards :beer:

    Christian

    BTW: I still believe, that there had been RBs beyound #6 :jumping: .

    Posted (edited)

    And the reverse...

    I have a question about suspension, as it looks odd to me.

    It seems it's combined ot two parts: 3-place aluminum and 4 place brass.

    Why do we have the following:

    - what was the need to put two of them together instead of using brand new 7-place suspension?

    - how are they held together - I don't see any joins?

    - you can see that aluminum suspension has brass one placed on top of it, but the needle is still there, essentially making it not functional. Why wasn't the needle removed? it serves no purpose and the construction would have been more solid without the needle.

    - why earlier awards (1 through 3) are placed on newer aluminum suspension, while more recent awards (4 through 7) are on older brass hanger?

    - how exactly was this suspension worn - with pin needle going only through half of the suspension?

    William

    Edited by new world
    Posted (edited)

    Marc, did you mean Lieutenant-General of Aviation I.I. Borzov? In their book about the Order of the Red Banner Durov and Strekalov list the S/N's of the Red Banners 1 to 6 of Borzov:

    Nr. 10731

    # 2 nr. 494

    # 3 nr. 577

    # 4 nr. 74

    # 5 nr. 86

    # 6 nr. 15

    So, if your 'Burcev' is 'Borzov', the group above might not be real, as it has no RB # 4. Also, Durov doesn't list a # 7 in Borzov's list, as they did with Pstygo for example (# 7 S/N 2).

    Edited by Ferdinand
    Posted

    I have a question about suspension, as it looks odd to me.

    It seems it's combined ot two parts: 3-place aluminum and 4 place brass.

    Why do we have the following:

    - what was the need to put two of them together instead of using brand new 7-place suspension?

    - how are they held together - I don't see any joins?

    - you can see that aluminum suspension has brass one placed on top of it, but the needle is still there, essentially making it not functional. Why wasn't the needle removed? it serves no purpose and the construction would have been more solid without the needle.

    - why earlier awards (1 through 3) are placed on newer aluminum suspension, while more recent awards (4 through 7) are on older brass hanger?

    - how exactly was this suspension worn - with pin needle going only through half of the suspension?

    William

    William,

    These are good points...

    Cheers.

    Ch.

    Posted

    I have a question about suspension, as it looks odd to me.

    It seems it's combined ot two parts: 3-place aluminum and 4 place brass.

    Why do we have the following:

    - what was the need to put two of them together instead of using brand new 7-place suspension?

    - how are they held together - I don't see any joins?

    - you can see that aluminum suspension has brass one placed on top of it, but the needle is still there, essentially making it not functional. Why wasn't the needle removed? it serves no purpose and the construction would have been more solid without the needle.

    - why earlier awards (1 through 3) are placed on newer aluminum suspension, while more recent awards (4 through 7) are on older brass hanger?

    - how exactly was this suspension worn - with pin needle going only through half of the suspension?

    William

    William,

    I, unfortunately, cannot answer your questions. This medal bar is held at the Central Museum in Moscow. It is not on display, but I was lucky enough to be shown a few things held in storage, this one among other things.

    On the matter of why join 2 suspensions instead of buying a longer one, it was not unusual for a veteran to fix his smaller suspensions together, probably a matter of savings (the USSR was a heaven for innovative re-use of almost everything). I have handled quite a few of these; they are either riveted, or soldered, or glued. I once even had one which was held by metallic thread!

    Marc

    Posted

    Marc, did you mean Lieutenant-General of Aviation I.I. Borzov? In their book about the Order of the Red Banner Durov and Strekalov list the S/N's of the Red Banners 1 to 6 of Borzov:

    Nr. 10731

    # 2 nr. 494

    # 3 nr. 577

    # 4 nr. 74

    # 5 nr. 86

    # 6 nr. 15

    So, if your 'Burcev' is 'Borzov', the group above might not be real, as it has no RB # 4. Also, Durov doesn't list a # 7 in Borzov's list, as they did with Pstygo for example (# 7 S/N 2).

    Auke,

    No, it is not Borzov, it is 'Бурцев'. I have to see if I wrote the numbers somewhere; unfortunately I did not have all the time I wanted to admire, to take pictures, and to write all the specifics down.

    Marc

    Posted

    No, it is not Borzov, it is 'Бурцев'. I have to see if I wrote the numbers somewhere; unfortunately I did not have all the time I wanted to admire, to take pictures, and to write all the specifics down.

    Dear Marc,

    which Бурцев is this :unsure: ? It's not the HSU http://www.warheroes.ru/hero/hero.asp?Hero_id=4990 , because he got only 2 RBs.

    So, a genuine RB#7 is at the museum :jumping: .

    What about the RB#8 :unsure: ?

    At least Eugene Rabkin is wrong with his statement, that RBs beyond RB#6 don't exist .... :rolleyes:

    Best regards :beer:

    Christian

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.