Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted (edited)

    By the way, sometimes same "sickle feature" (although not that pronounced) can be found on "grind off ring" variation

    Edited by JapanX
    • Replies 287
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Top Posters In This Topic

    Posted

    Nick, you flooded me with al this polars! The first one is very interesting (post 122 onwards): a lot of commonalities with mine, including the puzzling curling of the K upper arm.

    Also the "D" looks the same. I have to understand that these features are mainly in "pimple sickle" (T1.2) variations of this medal.

    Unfortunately (?) it still has most of the gilding on both sides, therefore it's hard to scan since there are too many reflections. But I think I could see the differences from the samples you posted.

    When I was told that my medal had some detail of a T2, I thought to the type you posted in #126, with the flat ring struck with the medal. I was not considering the Voenkomat.

    What type/subtype would be a "grind off ring" medal?

    Thank you

    Sergio

    P.S. For everybody's education (and amusement), next time I will post a couple of "true fake" Polars from my personal collection... :cheeky:

    Posted

    My understanding is that T1 is soldered ring, T1.1 without pimple and T1.2 with pimple on the sickle's handle.

    I think we are just not using the same convention Nick, I assume there are more than one.

    Posted

    Since we are talking of fake Polars since a while, here is a couple of "true fake" for discussion.

    They are, in my opinion, two examples of the same batch, with different treatments to simulate aging.

    The first one has a strong patina, the second one has none.

    No story, they are just fakes: there are a lot of wrong details both on the obverse and reverse. But, again, just look at the serifs on the "K"!

    http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_10_2013/post-5691-0-20586900-1380666024.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_10_2013/post-5691-0-74719200-1380666041.jpg

    http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_10_2013/post-5691-0-29187600-1380666252.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_10_2013/post-5691-0-59223700-1380666278.jpg

    Posted

    They are, in my opinion, two examples of the same batch, with different treatments to simulate aging.

    The first one has a strong patina, the second one has none.

    No story, they are just fakes: there are a lot of wrong details both on the obverse and reverse. But, again, just look at the serifs on the "K"!

    First looks like a cast to me.

    Second was made by stamp.

    Posted

    I think we are just not using the same convention Nick, I assume there are more than one.

    Well, it doesn't really matter how we label these :)

    If type2 is "grind off ring" (and not "voenkomat") then your piece still has different reverse than type2.

    I'll post a couple of comparisons tomorrow ;)

    Posted

    Thank you, Nick. I think that the example closest to my medal is the one with "pimpled" handle.

    Very interesting series of Polars, I was impressed.

    cheers

    sergio

    P.S. I am going to post more fakes from my "specialized" collection. No more Polars, unfortunately...

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.