Scott Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 I had this posted in the uniforms section, and Paul suggested I might get additional feedback if I posted it here. This example is not like any "big A" Assmann eagle I've seen - with the swaz connected by a fragile length of leg. This particular piece has already had the leg bent/cracked slightly. This is not my eagle, and these are the only photos I have.Any opinions - good/bad - on this one?Thanks!!Scott
Paul R Posted January 1, 2008 Posted January 1, 2008 Chest eagle for a summer tunic. Does anyone know if this is an original piece?
J Temple-West Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Hi Scott.Most (I include myself) consider these aluminium large ?A? eagles to be post-war produced. If we look at the comparison of the original aluminium ?DRGM? marked badge (top) and the later ?A? marked example in zinc (middle) we see that the same obverse die was used for both, showing that the argument for there being a second set of dies produced by ?Assmann? for the aluminium large ?A? type (bottom) is a non-starter.
François SAEZ Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 Chest eagle for a summer tunic. Does anyone know if this is an original piece?I know what it is supposed to be not the term for what it is
Scott Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 Thanks everyone. I thought it was a bit odd, but wanted to be certain.Cheers.Scott
norwest78 Posted January 6, 2008 Posted January 6, 2008 One thing you will never see on original metal breast eagles (and pith helmet eagles, as well, I believe) is the swastika attached to the body of the eagle by only the leg. This is much too fragile, and prone to bending or breaking off.--Kevin
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now