joe campbell Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 for your consideration:a recent trade brought this one into my fold.this is a cased 1914 EK 1, highly vaulted, andof high silver content, although the percent silveris not marked.there is a relatively small amount of wear, withthe condition of the paint being excellent.obverse.
joe campbell Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 the reverse is notable for several reasons.first, there appears to be a lacquer-like substance which still remains on some areas of the back and in the recesses of the maker mark.next, the maker itself. it is markedJ H WERNER below the hinge,andBERLIN above the catch.these are the deepest, widest MM's i've seen in quite a while.i have seen this maker mark on maker mark lists,but have never even seen a picture of one. if anyone knows of any references with pix/info, please let me know.thanks,joe
joe campbell Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 finally, a zoomie of the MM.note that at the base of the pin,there is a MM "XI".not certain if that's an inspector or technician number, but it's there.i'd appreciate any info you may beable to provide.thanks!joe
Stogieman Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Hi Joe, very nice cross and marked like this, rather hard to find. I've seen less than a dozen like this before!
Biro Posted December 13, 2005 Posted December 13, 2005 Hi JoeVery nice piece!Here is another Werner for comparison....[attachmentid=19014]Interestingly, although the pin and hinge set-up is different to yours, this one also appears to have something on the underside of the pin.... although it's impossible to make out what it is.Marshall[attachmentid=19015]
joe campbell Posted December 13, 2005 Author Posted December 13, 2005 GREAT pictures, marshall!!yes there are differences, but there are somevery intereresting similarities.i believe the 1914 numerals are very similar.the crowns are similar, as is the "W".while the hinge and pin are different, it israther striking how similar the catch is.i wish i knew how to do side-by-sidecomparisons.... thank you for your photos, marshall.joe
Guest Rick Research Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 Well, I've never seen ANY J.H. Werner product but a Turkish War Medal star before (the best, better than Godet) but here's the reverse of my TWM, bought by later Konteradmiral (V) August B?ning in the 1920s--[attachmentid=19022][attachmentid=19023]Notice that the lettering is exactly like Joe's, with heavy deep letters and serifs on them, "Times New Roman" rather than "Arial" for approximate typeface. Not at all like the Winckler piece's lettering, though the same soft enough to have bent "partly used toothpaste tube" pin and on all of these the heavy catch appears similar.
joe campbell Posted December 14, 2005 Author Posted December 14, 2005 if that's as nice a piece from the front as it is from the back....HINT! HINT!where might i find more info on JHWerner?a smaller, revved-up Godet, huh...joe
Mike K Posted December 14, 2005 Posted December 14, 2005 (edited) Hi,Joe, that's an exceptionally nice example of a very hard to find variant! I've seen that "laquer" effect on very few 1914 EK1s and personally I think it is more of an echt silver plating over solid silver frame(s).Marshall, that "oval" hingeplate looks like something I'd expect from a "WS" example - same for the core. That's a flat cross, correct? It's looking like more "interbreeding" between EK manufacturers! Assuming that maker mark hasn't been added more recently to increase value.Rick, I too would love to see the obverse of your Turkish Star. I'd expect superior enameling.The only other Werner marked example I have in my collection is a Prussian RAO 4th class on tri-fold ribbon - marked J.H.W. on the lower arm. I don't think there would be too many manufacturers with those initials.Here's my EK1 example. It also marked under the hinge with a roman numeral, from memory a number between 14 and 18 because initially I thought it may have been the year of manufacture - that is obviously not the case. It's well worn and each outer corner has been bent over slightly, I assume for additional "grip" onto a uniform. RegardsMike K Edited December 14, 2005 by Mike K
joe campbell Posted December 15, 2005 Author Posted December 15, 2005 mike -many thanks for your pictures and comments.there just isn't much info i can lay my hands on.joe
Glenn R Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 I've got a 935 marked EK1 with a fully laquered back, I'll get some pictures of it when I get chance. It is heavily vaulted and has no maker mark.
Glenn R Posted December 15, 2005 Posted December 15, 2005 I'll get some pictures done by the weekend for you Joe, bit tied up at work at the mo.
Blitz Posted December 16, 2005 Posted December 16, 2005 Thanks for sharing Joe & all! Wonderfull looking crosses..
DavidM Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Hello JoeCongratulations on really nice, excellent condition cross. RegardsDavid
Daniel Murphy Posted December 17, 2005 Posted December 17, 2005 Joe and all, Those are beautiful crosses. I will have to add one of these to my EK 1 want list alongside of the Hansen and AWS pillow back already on it. Hint, hint. Dan Murphy
Glenn R Posted December 31, 2005 Posted December 31, 2005 Here's the picture I promised of the laquered cross. Can't seem to get the camera to show the laquering effect on this cross. It is however very finely sheened and it appears period. You can just make out a bit of reflection on the picture.
joe campbell Posted December 31, 2005 Author Posted December 31, 2005 glenn-great cross! any markings?i see the areas on the reverse andknow what you mean - sometimes scans and digital pix can't make upfor having the proverbial bird in hand!!nevertheless, i didn't know if thelacquer effect was legitimate - itappears to be.thanks, glenn!joe
Glenn R Posted December 31, 2005 Posted December 31, 2005 Hi Joe, it is simply marked 935 in the centre of the reverse. I bought it some years ago from a well known dealer. It was described as being unmarked but probably high silver content. I got it out of the bag and the first thing I saw was the content mark. One of those "Yeessss" moments as it cost very little. Somehow it's one of those pieces that froms the core of my collection. I don't have the means to amass a large collection so find myself buying and selling a lot and my collection is in a permanent state of flux. Somehow I just cannot part with this one and know I'd regret it if I ever did. Not that it's anything world-meltingly special it just has that something about it.
joe campbell Posted December 31, 2005 Author Posted December 31, 2005 isn't it sweet when things like this fall in your lap!!all the more reason to keep it, if only to savor that moment.but you've got more than that. the obverse is every bit as sweetas the reverse.don't let it go!joe
HeikoGrusdat Posted January 2, 2006 Posted January 2, 2006 here is a mini EK2 with 18mm from J.H.Werner , a very high quality piece made of silver, fine details!!! I think Werner made some of the best awards, great EK`s and wonderfull turkish war medals (iron halfmoon) !!!! This mini one comes from a Oberst of the Artillerie.
joe campbell Posted January 3, 2006 Author Posted January 3, 2006 heiko!that's a TREASURE!!you could display that from the reverse.great MM.joe
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now