-
Posts
1,219 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by Hoss
-
Chris I had one it was one of the first items I purchased here in the States out of shotgun news dated 1914 steel framed instead of wood, cloth straps (with blue stripes?) the eyelets were brass and had leather reinforcing. The painted rust coloured steel frame was inked but hard to make out the material was that lovely ochre denim. Eric
-
Gents I'd appreciate comments on the straps one clamp has three separate numbers on different components so I don't see them as dates 044 045 & 047,,,clips are spring loaded that snap shut, straps are made from hemp.. The shovel is a type used by mortar crews its different better heavier made with an ash wood shaft than latter TR examples. Cheers Eric
-
Gents I promise not to say Bridget anymore! that being whatever a lot of on-line and book references may or not have to be adjusted. Regarding finishes and camouflage that's a complicated and time consuming study, can take decades 'hitting the bricks' and 'whats underneath' from what I can make out so far because Allied isn't really my focus early 75's wore light grey then changed to a medium matt grey very much like German guns. I would be most interested to learn when: a. The French including official specific dates adopted more than two camouflage colours on the Western Front. b. Same re: The British Commonwealth and AEF Forces. Cheers Eric
-
Gents The serial I quoted is incorrect 17318 that's the number of another gun at a Memorial. The WP gun is #13579 so we are left with Blimey! well for me: Is the West Point gun 'Bridget'? or just a story made up? btw the plague should read 'First Artillery Shell fired' if they make that claim imo and I noticed a period image that floats around the net showing a crew with their gun. This picture is shown in a lot of museums even Europe when displaying a piece an original image also resides in the National Archives so I'm told. Regards Pain in the bottom Hoss lol! Eric
-
Hi Jock Are the Imperial and latter ones different? what a pity the mouthpiece is missing otherwise its in nice condition in the good old days you could probably find missing bits at flea markets. I just sold mine disappointingly I may add, marked 1913 they were and important piece of equipment imo. British vets would tell of the German bugles going off after a bombardment. Eric
-
Machine Gun Boettcher
Hoss replied to Ralph A's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Eric -
The Machinegunners badge
Hoss replied to dond's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Jesus I don't usually get on well with mods I'm done for. Eric -
The Machinegunners badge
Hoss replied to dond's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Interesting info on the tunic. I just noticed the mg is pointing to the right not left on the badge, there is a US military intelligence report prepared for the war department on German abbreviations from W1 through '43 a 'Sch' could just be for scharfschütze, just a thought its something more simple. Eric -
The Machinegunners badge
Hoss replied to dond's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment
Thanks Gents Prussian thats a cool photo, what the heck is that badge! I want one!!! Eric -
The Machinegunners badge
Hoss replied to dond's topic in Germany: Imperial: Uniforms, Headwear, Insignia & Personal Equipment