Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Hoss

    Past Contributor
    • Posts

      1,219
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    Everything posted by Hoss

    1. Chip Where did this leather shortage thing come from did all the cows take holidays or something?,,,stuck in the Bahamas and couldn't get back I guess. Eric
    2. Chris I had one it was one of the first items I purchased here in the States out of shotgun news dated 1914 steel framed instead of wood, cloth straps (with blue stripes?) the eyelets were brass and had leather reinforcing. The painted rust coloured steel frame was inked but hard to make out the material was that lovely ochre denim. Eric
    3. Gents I'd appreciate comments on the straps one clamp has three separate numbers on different components so I don't see them as dates 044 045 & 047,,,clips are spring loaded that snap shut, straps are made from hemp.. The shovel is a type used by mortar crews its different better heavier made with an ash wood shaft than latter TR examples. Cheers Eric
    4. Gents I promise not to say Bridget anymore! that being whatever a lot of on-line and book references may or not have to be adjusted. Regarding finishes and camouflage that's a complicated and time consuming study, can take decades 'hitting the bricks' and 'whats underneath' from what I can make out so far because Allied isn't really my focus early 75's wore light grey then changed to a medium matt grey very much like German guns. I would be most interested to learn when: a. The French including official specific dates adopted more than two camouflage colours on the Western Front. b. Same re: The British Commonwealth and AEF Forces. Cheers Eric
    5. Gents The serial I quoted is incorrect 17318 that's the number of another gun at a Memorial. The WP gun is #13579 so we are left with Blimey! well for me: Is the West Point gun 'Bridget'? or just a story made up? btw the plague should read 'First Artillery Shell fired' if they make that claim imo and I noticed a period image that floats around the net showing a crew with their gun. This picture is shown in a lot of museums even Europe when displaying a piece an original image also resides in the National Archives so I'm told. Regards Pain in the bottom Hoss lol! Eric
    6. Irish I only knew the supposed name of the US 75 was 'Bridget' #17318 then I saw this post last night, I didnt even know what museum it was at I'm a Imperial German type dude lol! Eric
    7. Check your link again 'restored and repainted' btw the tank finish isn't original either, being a healthy skeptic the main reason Pershing probably wanted the gun sent home was to be taken apart? were they any in the States at this time? Is that the serial number in one of the posted photos? Eric
    8. Bridget serial is 17318 what number is the gun at West Point? Eric
    9. Vaguely Hostile? Simple answer I didn't appreciate your post what do you mean by 'Europeans' and 'certainly not the French'? for the ..."eventually"... I'm sorry Gents it was stupid and childish a quote from 'Dads Army' !! Eric
    10. Really whats original camouflage paint look like? yea they must have been really excited....man. I mean cooool man did they hit anything? us 'Europeans' could not wait for you 'guys' to show up.......eventually. Eric ps isn't this the same gun?
    11. That's all been added I'm assuming its 'Bridget' its been 'done up' and the finish isn't original of course. Regards Eric
    12. Jock outside my limited knowledge I'm afraid google google surprisingly not long ago I found for example a site that discusses old German military lanterns. Cheers
    13. The Imperial steel jobs seem to sell quite well but they have to be in good complete condition and reg.marks make a big difference of course. Eric
    14. Hi Jock Are the Imperial and latter ones different? what a pity the mouthpiece is missing otherwise its in nice condition in the good old days you could probably find missing bits at flea markets. I just sold mine disappointingly I may add, marked 1913 they were and important piece of equipment imo. British vets would tell of the German bugles going off after a bombardment. Eric
    15. I still think he is wearing red stripe stonegrau, the tunic looks wartime made feldgrau. the right old boy is wearing prewar uniform that tented to match more. Come on old timers who is the General on the right? Eric
    16. It mattered more in those days Chris your more educated. a spade looked like a spade etc. Eric
    17. They don't look like grenades and on a white field I dunno, and I've been reading (which is dangerous lol!). Eric
    18. Could be a Trench Flapper soldiers that cleaned dugouts/trenches of gas, don't get the grenade thing they look like brooms, I used to own an original specialist grenade sleeve patch sold it to GWM. Eric
    19. Interesting info on the tunic. I just noticed the mg is pointing to the right not left on the badge, there is a US military intelligence report prepared for the war department on German abbreviations from W1 through '43 a 'Sch' could just be for scharfschütze, just a thought its something more simple. Eric
    20. Thanks Gents Prussian thats a cool photo, what the heck is that badge! I want one!!! Eric
    21. Just sharing a photo I bought if Gents could make the name I'd appreciate it. Eric
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.