Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ed_Haynes

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      14,343
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      25

    Everything posted by Ed_Haynes

    1. At least not in Russia, although, from what I hear, they and their ideology are alive and well in some of the other former-Soviet republics. There are many semi-fantasy "Cossack" awards about, who knows how legitimate they are.
    2. Thanks, I was busily digging through Hong Kong related material -- whew . . .
    3. The Mahsood Medal The current highest gallantry award.
    4. List above corrected. I wonder if Lkhagvasuren's Suvorov (also 1st class?) was also of 8 September 1945? The cosmonaut Gurragchaa Soviet hero star (and Lenin) was part of the usual space flight guest reciprocity, although Mongolia tended to shower hero stars on Soviet cosmonauts (five of them, plus Tereshkova's labor hero!). Presumably, Ganzorig got a routine Lenin as the back-up guest cosmonaut?
    5. Taken outside, goofly reflections, but more fairly shows how the repaired area looks. Honest damage, for sure.
    6. Yes, with the changes in the former USSR, it seems a lot of things have crawled out from under rocks.
    7. Since we have more pictures of "Big C" than almost anyone else, I have been playing around with a chronology for his awards. Maybe I'll start a thread if there's any interest?
    8. There must be a book out there, patterned on the various Soviet volumes, that recounts the tales of heroism of the various heroes of the MPR? And, actually, the repair looks much better than than scan. Let me try a photo. Somerthing about the way the scanner light hits it.
    9. Believed to have been damaged in wear by the (known) recipient. I am constrained as to what else I can say, sorry.
    10. Some repaired enamel damage (which looks much worse scanned than it does in person), but, still, . . .
    11. So far as I know -- and I could be wrong -- research on the 1985 OPWs is not possible. Such research would cost rather more than the cost of the award anyway? I presume they were numbered and cocumneted because awards were supposed to be numbered and documented. And they were respected at the time. Coming back to the US from India (via Frankfurt) at about that time, I wound up sitting next to a veteran coming back to the US after going back to the USSR to get his OPW, which he was wearing -- he had literal tears in his eyes talking with pride about his new award!
    12. Between "rules" and their application, there is always a great chasm. That is where it gets interesting, after all.
    13. Other than biographical research on individuals, driven by having the document, I don't see where one could go.
    14. Becaused they were given to GPW veterans merely for surviving?
    15. Just make sure you finish your own Albanian collection before you take your book public. Imagine what it will do to that field!! Having a good reference and a stock emerging from the central bank in Ulanbaatar conjoined to make a bubble. For the type collectors, it is passing. Yet, given the small numbers awarded (just over 2,000 Sukhbaatars as opposed to some 460,000 Lenins), I doubt things will drop too far, especially if/when research becomes an option.
    16. # 191640 of 22 May 1997. An interesting pair, suggesting a timeframe for the changeover from screwback to pinback and the timing of the new design of award booklets.
    17. A couple of second class mommy groups to try to breathe some life into the old forum . . .
    18. # 7388, 15 September 1995. Just 17 days and 416 numbers later that the previous set!
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.