Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Wound Badge Evolution


    JapanX

    Recommended Posts

    Again alive and kicking... That is if anybody worried... Concerning last one I have serious doubts :lol:

    Ok. Let's try to sort out this two problems for starters.

    Problem number one will be simple. Could be formulated like this.

    "What the heck is that???"

    I mean what type of the badge is this?

    Obviously it is badge type 3. This is type 3.1 or type 3.3.

    But where is all the gold?

    The badge is brand new!!!

    Same goes for the box!

    And there a lot of them out there!

    Of course a lot is "a lot".

    Regulation violation?

    Edited by JapanX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Same absence of regulated gold we observe on type 2.3 (there is no gold on the rim).

    Only variation 2.1 has something that resembles gold rim (in fact by regulation it shouldn't),

    but I think it's just patina (take a good look at the reverse - same color pattern).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Problem number two is much more difficult to deal with.

    This badge was called "eccentric" because he has very unusual anthropometric characteristics.

    To discuss them allow me to remind you that

    large shield badge (type 1.1, type 1.2, type 2.1 and type 2.2) should be (according to regulation)

    width 30,3 mm and height 33,3 mm

    small shield badge (type 2.3- type 3.4) should be (according to regulation)

    width 24 mm and height about 27 mm.

    In practice

    typical large shield badge usually weights about 17,5 grams and had width about 24,3 mm and height about 28,5 mm.

    typical small shield badge usually weights about 10,25 grams and had width about 30,5 mm and height about 37,26 mm.

    So far so good. Nobody is perfect.

    But this is the characteristics of eccentric badge

    weight about 2,72 grams, width about 13,5 mm and height about 16,5 mm.

    What is that???

    Miniature?

    Are you kidding me? Miniature for a badge 24 by 28 mm???

    For what? To go blind while trying to figure out what is it?

    Edited by JapanX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Problem № 3

    RARITY

    Why types 1-3 are so rare?

    Ok. Type 1.1 and type 1.2 - they got some reasons.

    The only serious combat operation back in 1914 was capturing Zingtao - german base in China.

    After the siege japanese losses were

    Army: 246 killed, 1115 wounded

    Navy artillery: 11 killed, 32 wounded

    Navy: 284 killed, 32 wounded

    So it's quite natural that type 1 quite rare.

    But why type 2?

    It covers Siberia expedition and it wasn't all about fun.

    And an least type 3.

    It covers everything until 1938.

    Of course early types of badges were replaced by new ones. No doubt about it.

    But what happend with the early ones after they were replaced?

    No answer ...

    Edited by JapanX
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ... ZERO ...

    Sounds familiar? Is it? :lol:

    ... excellent analytical work!

    Thanks mate. But with a lot (even judging by my low standars :lol:) of grammar and spelling mistakes. But I had a really hard day yesterday... First snow in Moscow .... Stuff like that ... :lol:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ERRATUM

    In practice

    typical large shield badge usually weights about 17,5 grams and had width about 24,3 mm and height about 28,5 mm.

    typical small shield badge usually weights about 10,25 grams and had width about 30,5 mm and height about 37,26 mm.

    should be read as

    typical SMALL shield badge usually weights about 17,5 grams and had width about 24,3 mm and height about 28,5 mm.

    typical LARGE shield badge usually weights about 10,25 grams and had width about 30,5 mm and height about 37,26 mm.

    Sorry about that.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ADDENDUM

    1) Sometime you can meet boxes for type 1 and type 2 with dark red-brown interior (not turquoise as was shown).

    2) The main difference in inscriptions on the cover of type 3.1 and type 3.2 boxes is upper kanji in the middle column.

    In case of type 3.1 box cover we observe kanji kou (甲) for "higher', " superior" (i.e. battle wound).

    In case of type 3.2 box cover we observe kanji otsu (乙) for 'lower" (i.e. public service wound).

    Right columns on the covers of type 3.1 and 3.2 boxes are identical: 下士以下 stands for "NCO and below"

    Please note that inscriptions on the type 1.1 and type 2.3 boxes are identical!!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.