fjcp Posted January 28, 2007 Share Posted January 28, 2007 rev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted January 28, 2007 Author Share Posted January 28, 2007 JC's post prompts me to add a document for a Type 2.2 (unnumbered) medal. This suggests these unnumbered pieces are not mere escapees as some had thought.Exterior. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted January 28, 2007 Author Share Posted January 28, 2007 And the interior, dated 28 April 1989. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gor Posted February 15, 2007 Share Posted February 15, 2007 One more .Does is it exists first type or not? http://img252.imageshack.us/my.php?image=40058082cv1.jpghttp://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=16602197ph8.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 15, 2007 Author Share Posted February 15, 2007 Yes, Gor (good to see you here, cheers!). There is a lot of extra variability here. Bat will (we hope) be expanding on this in an anticipated SECOND EDITION. There are, however, some fakes, some dangerous, some not, of this particular award. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Here's one that I recently bought. Nice box and (corresponding?) booklet. The date seems out of whack though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 Nice one, I think. But the date/number relationship does raise questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fjcp Posted April 6, 2007 Share Posted April 6, 2007 (edited) An interesting one that recently sold on Ebay for about $600.....New high for a type 1.2 I believe.... ( or is that a type 1.3???)JC Edited April 7, 2007 by fjcp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 7, 2007 Author Share Posted April 7, 2007 This is indeed an odd one, and one I'd be careful with. The number is at the super-high end of the "cross" variety (our working type 1.3), but it sure doesn't look enameled to me (seems pretty surely a type 1.1). The numbering style seems strange too.This medal is being faked and this may well be one of those? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stogieman Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I agree with Ed, does not look like enamel on there. But the patina, if chemically applied, is very, very well done....Note the cut suspension ring that's not quite lined up as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted April 7, 2007 Author Share Posted April 7, 2007 The first variety was painted rather than enameled, and that variety is heavily faked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 (edited) to add to the confusion :speechless: Edited June 24, 2008 by Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 24, 2008 Share Posted June 24, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted June 25, 2008 Author Share Posted June 25, 2008 Ohhhhhhhhhhh. I don't much like the looks of that one. I know some fakes exist. Have we just seen one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Ohhhhhhhhhhh. I don't much like the looks of that one. I know some fakes exist. Have we just seen one?Please elaborate - just got this one from the January Markov auction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted June 25, 2008 Author Share Posted June 25, 2008 Please elaborate - just got this one from the January Markov auctionShall do so, but my specimens are currently half a world away and unavailable for comparison. As soon as possible. How is the "feel" of the medal. Sometimes hard to tell from scans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 It "felt" good - incl. details for instance on front top near ring.It's the number at reverse that made me puzzle - but the "1" looks very close to one I've seen elsewhereWill post weights after the weekendI suspect that this medal requires careful review as some people say fakes, but it could also be an issue of multiple variations - I'm not convinced yet re fakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted July 5, 2008 Author Share Posted July 5, 2008 Just an update:Type 1.1 (?Cross? obverse, silver painted) - Low = 10; High = 76Type 1.2 (?Cross? obverse, silver enameled, green leaves) - Low = 13; High = ??Type 1.3 (?Cross? obverse, silver enameled) - Low = 249; High = 381Type 2.1 (red obverse, silver numbered) - Low = 1027; High = 1232Type 2.2 (red obverse, silver unnumbered, escapee?) Also reminds me I get mine in hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted July 5, 2008 Share Posted July 5, 2008 It "felt" good - incl. details for instance on front top near ring.It's the number at reverse that made me puzzle - but the "1" looks very close to one I've seen elsewhereWill post weights after the weekendI suspect that this medal requires careful review as some people say fakes, but it could also be an issue of multiple variations - I'm not convinced yet re fakes34.5 gr24.0 gr (excl. suspension)Unfortunately don't have my other's handy for comparison weighing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 There's a nr 258 for sale on ebay for a whopping 950 USD (somebody's selling some major pieces of a collection)Reminds me to get mine out of the vault for weighing in a few days so we can do some comparison and hopefully establish some weight ranges Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvaton Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 two medals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvaton Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 two medals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvaton Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 two medals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvaton Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 +++ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corvaton Posted August 27, 2009 Share Posted August 27, 2009 +++ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now