Ed_Haynes Posted January 27, 2007 Author Share Posted January 27, 2007 How late did awards of the Medal "We Won" extend?!Outside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted January 27, 2007 Author Share Posted January 27, 2007 Inside. Awarded 26 August 1985, apparently without serial number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 The devil did not make me do it-- ED did. Here are two MORE Mongolian medals which I have been bewitched, bedazzled, and beguiled into buying at a militaria show today--Type 2 1946 Anniversary Medal and 1961 Anniversary Medal. I know, I know, you specialists are thinking: But what is on the OTHER side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 Yep, just as with you imperial German sorts, we like looking at the backsides . . . back sides . . . ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 OK, so 1946 # 14988 is nothing special (though somebody apprently thought it might have been gold and I just cannot resist Moscow Enamel Buddies products) but check out 1961:So, do I get to claim--no matter how briefly-- a New World Record? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 And we have . . . <drum roll> . . . a new record low number. (Amazing how easy we are to please?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Well, at least two of us are pleased! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 And, if we can ever crack into the records, this could well be a "someone". (Ask me in a few weeks.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fjcp Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Well, at least two of us are pleased! That makes three of us.... I'm nuts about low serial numbers, hell serial numbers are good period!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Boonzaier Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Well, at least two of us are pleased! Make it three...Did the seller know it was a low number or did that not interest him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerd Becker Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 (edited) OK, so 1946 # 14988 is nothing special (though somebody apprently thought it might have been gold and I just cannot resist Moscow Enamel Buddies products) but check out 1961:So, do I get to claim--no matter how briefly-- a New World Record?Nice! Did you pay more than for a usual one?Gerd Edited March 5, 2007 by Gerd Becker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Well, that would depend on whose "regular price" you mean. There is quite a range in what these are offered for, but I was there and these were there and I had money and now they're mine mine mine. I did not even LOOK at the serial number until I got home, not expecting it to be anything exciting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now