juvatwad Posted January 13, 2008 Share Posted January 13, 2008 (edited) Awhile back I posted this white top officer visor. The general consensus was that it was not good, mainly based on the lack of a waffle pattern top. I took it apart, and I have to say, I personally don't know. I do know where it's been for at least the last 30 years, and the construction is complex for a 1970's fake. The top has a flap into which a corresponding tongue on the main body fits. It is then fixed with a single small snap. I didn't take it apart the first time I posted it here, so I would appreciate a reevaluation now. If it's not real, what exactly is it? Has anyone seen this construction before?Thanks!Ian Edited January 13, 2008 by juvatwad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
François SAEZ Posted January 14, 2008 Share Posted January 14, 2008 We now go in a deeper examination of the cap which was discussed here http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=22627 and close ups of details should (maybe) teach us something (right or wrong), for us all to learn, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrier Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 I do not see anything wrong with the basic cap at all. As for the eagle (the photos from the other link are not showing up on my computer), I could not tell without actually holding it in person. In the photos here, nothing says "automatically bad". Regarding the top, I am not aware of any regulation saying that it HAD to be waffle pattern (and even if there was, that wouldn't be the end of the story). If it is a thick weave cotton (which in the photos it seems to be), then what is wrong with it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juvatwad Posted January 15, 2008 Author Share Posted January 15, 2008 I think officer's visors with the waffle pattern top are the type seen in period photos. Theoretically it would be easy to take an enlisted top (which this resembles) and put it on an officer body, but this top and body appear to me to have been constructed as a unit. The cloth pocket on the top and the corresponding tongue on the body are a first for me, although I haven't handled many white visors at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrier Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 (edited) Based only on what I have seen over the years in the collections of reputable collectors, I truly believe that there are so many variations in construction of clothing items that we will never see them all. It can be a dangerous thing to stray from the path of "textbook", and I would not recommend it as regular practice, but I do believe that many good items are passed by when a collector is unwilling to do so.P.S. In my collection, my officer and my general white tops both have waffle pattern tops, and my enlisted has plain cotton, yet I stand by what I said here. Edited January 15, 2008 by Harrier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 I have a yellow piped visor with this same top, vet acquired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacques Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 Hi,I have not been collecting visor caps for few year ago but I don't see something really wrong. The top is not what we expect for an officer cap, but it looks more to an NCO's cap top. It seems to match to the cap , at least on the picture.I would say it is OK. Could it be an officer candidate cap ?jacques Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juvatwad Posted January 15, 2008 Author Share Posted January 15, 2008 That's my dilemma. Given the details of construction, this doesn't look put together to deceive. If one does not accept this example as a legitimate officer visor, what else can it be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrier Posted January 15, 2008 Share Posted January 15, 2008 I think Jacques raises an interesting point, but an officer candidate would not (I don't believe) be entitled to the silver piping. I'm pretty convinced it is a real officer cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juvatwad Posted January 18, 2008 Author Share Posted January 18, 2008 Harrier, I appreciate your comments. I'd be greatful if others would weigh in as well, particularly those who commented on the previous thread. Is there anything here that would cause you to change your opinion?Thanks,Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naxos Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 I think Jacques raises an interesting point, but an officer candidate would not (I don't believe) be entitled to the silver piping. I'm pretty convinced it is a real officer cap.Here is an army officer canidate in the ranf of Oberfeldwebel with silver cord on the visor. Hardy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harrier Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 I'm sorry if I may not have been clear. An officer candidate would certainly be entitled to the silver cap cord. I do not believe that the candidate would be entitled to the silver PIPING on the capband. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naxos Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 I'm sorry if I may not have been clear. An officer candidate would certainly be entitled to the silver cap cord. I do not believe that the candidate would be entitled to the silver PIPING on the capband. I misunderstoodHardy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul R Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Maybe an officer candidate in the HG? The piping seems white, not silver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
François SAEZ Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Maybe an officer candidate in the HG? The piping seems white, not silver.HG with army insignas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul R Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 HG with army insignas?'No, I was talking about the LW Visor. The crown piping seems white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
François SAEZ Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 'No, I was talking about the LW Visor. The crown piping seems white.On LW white top caps, piping is never on the top but on the base of the cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul R Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 On LW white top caps, piping is never on the top but on the base of the cap Thank you Francois. I have a lot to learn about visors! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nesredep Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 On LW white top caps, piping is never on the top but on the base of the capHello!I agree. All the bestNesredep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now